Interprofessional perspectives on schizophrenia: a comparative study of ICF core set assessments by occupational therapy and mental health social work students.
{"title":"Interprofessional perspectives on schizophrenia: a comparative study of ICF core set assessments by occupational therapy and mental health social work students.","authors":"Yasuhisa Nakamura, Kyoko Otani, Kazuko Ando, Mayumi Yoshikawa, Ayako Furuzawa","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2539852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective community support for individuals with schizophrenia requires robust interprofessional collaboration between occupational therapy and mental health social work services. Differences in professional training may lead to variable assessments of patients' living conditions, influencing the effectiveness of collaborative care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore differences in assessments between 109 occupational therapy students (OTS) and 72 mental health social work students (MHSWS). The participants assessed video-based scenarios depicting the living conditions of individuals with schizophrenia. Network analysis compared the assessment structures and examined how their professional training influenced evaluations. Logistic regression identified significant discriminative factors, including b152 (emotional function), b180 (experience of self and time), d155 (acquiring skills), d570 (looking after one's health), d845 (acquiring, maintaining, and terminating a job), and e460 (societal attitude), with an accuracy of 84.3%. OTS emphasized d240 (handling stress and other psychological demands) and b140 (attention functions), whereas MHSWS focused on d230 (carrying out daily routines) and d570, highlighting distinct professional perspectives. This study underscores recognizing and integrating different professional perspectives in interprofessional collaboration. Educational programs should leverage the unique strengths of each discipline to enhance collaborative care for individuals with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2539852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Effective community support for individuals with schizophrenia requires robust interprofessional collaboration between occupational therapy and mental health social work services. Differences in professional training may lead to variable assessments of patients' living conditions, influencing the effectiveness of collaborative care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore differences in assessments between 109 occupational therapy students (OTS) and 72 mental health social work students (MHSWS). The participants assessed video-based scenarios depicting the living conditions of individuals with schizophrenia. Network analysis compared the assessment structures and examined how their professional training influenced evaluations. Logistic regression identified significant discriminative factors, including b152 (emotional function), b180 (experience of self and time), d155 (acquiring skills), d570 (looking after one's health), d845 (acquiring, maintaining, and terminating a job), and e460 (societal attitude), with an accuracy of 84.3%. OTS emphasized d240 (handling stress and other psychological demands) and b140 (attention functions), whereas MHSWS focused on d230 (carrying out daily routines) and d570, highlighting distinct professional perspectives. This study underscores recognizing and integrating different professional perspectives in interprofessional collaboration. Educational programs should leverage the unique strengths of each discipline to enhance collaborative care for individuals with schizophrenia.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.