Interprofessional perspectives on schizophrenia: a comparative study of ICF core set assessments by occupational therapy and mental health social work students.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yasuhisa Nakamura, Kyoko Otani, Kazuko Ando, Mayumi Yoshikawa, Ayako Furuzawa
{"title":"Interprofessional perspectives on schizophrenia: a comparative study of ICF core set assessments by occupational therapy and mental health social work students.","authors":"Yasuhisa Nakamura, Kyoko Otani, Kazuko Ando, Mayumi Yoshikawa, Ayako Furuzawa","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2539852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Effective community support for individuals with schizophrenia requires robust interprofessional collaboration between occupational therapy and mental health social work services. Differences in professional training may lead to variable assessments of patients' living conditions, influencing the effectiveness of collaborative care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore differences in assessments between 109 occupational therapy students (OTS) and 72 mental health social work students (MHSWS). The participants assessed video-based scenarios depicting the living conditions of individuals with schizophrenia. Network analysis compared the assessment structures and examined how their professional training influenced evaluations. Logistic regression identified significant discriminative factors, including b152 (emotional function), b180 (experience of self and time), d155 (acquiring skills), d570 (looking after one's health), d845 (acquiring, maintaining, and terminating a job), and e460 (societal attitude), with an accuracy of 84.3%. OTS emphasized d240 (handling stress and other psychological demands) and b140 (attention functions), whereas MHSWS focused on d230 (carrying out daily routines) and d570, highlighting distinct professional perspectives. This study underscores recognizing and integrating different professional perspectives in interprofessional collaboration. Educational programs should leverage the unique strengths of each discipline to enhance collaborative care for individuals with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2539852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective community support for individuals with schizophrenia requires robust interprofessional collaboration between occupational therapy and mental health social work services. Differences in professional training may lead to variable assessments of patients' living conditions, influencing the effectiveness of collaborative care. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore differences in assessments between 109 occupational therapy students (OTS) and 72 mental health social work students (MHSWS). The participants assessed video-based scenarios depicting the living conditions of individuals with schizophrenia. Network analysis compared the assessment structures and examined how their professional training influenced evaluations. Logistic regression identified significant discriminative factors, including b152 (emotional function), b180 (experience of self and time), d155 (acquiring skills), d570 (looking after one's health), d845 (acquiring, maintaining, and terminating a job), and e460 (societal attitude), with an accuracy of 84.3%. OTS emphasized d240 (handling stress and other psychological demands) and b140 (attention functions), whereas MHSWS focused on d230 (carrying out daily routines) and d570, highlighting distinct professional perspectives. This study underscores recognizing and integrating different professional perspectives in interprofessional collaboration. Educational programs should leverage the unique strengths of each discipline to enhance collaborative care for individuals with schizophrenia.

精神分裂症的跨专业视角:职业治疗与心理健康社会工作专业学生ICF核心集评估的比较研究。
为精神分裂症患者提供有效的社区支持需要职业治疗和心理健康社会工作服务之间强有力的跨专业合作。专业培训的差异可能导致对患者生活状况的不同评估,影响协作护理的有效性。本横断面研究旨在探讨109名职业治疗专业学生(OTS)与72名心理健康社会工作专业学生(MHSWS)在评估上的差异。参与者评估了描述精神分裂症患者生活状况的视频场景。网络分析比较了评估结构,并考察了他们的专业培训如何影响评估。Logistic回归发现了显著的判别因素,包括b152(情感功能)、b180(自我和时间经验)、d155(获得技能)、d570(照顾健康)、d845(获得、维持和终止工作)和e460(社会态度),准确率为84.3%。OTS强调d240(处理压力和其他心理需求)和b140(注意功能),而MHSWS则强调d230(执行日常事务)和d570,突出了不同的专业视角。本研究强调在跨专业合作中认识和整合不同的专业观点。教育项目应利用每个学科的独特优势,加强对精神分裂症患者的合作护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信