Central and peripheral fatigue indices following resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction among people with multiple sclerosis.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1152/jn.00197.2025
Ethan C Hill, Christopher E Proppe, Sean M Lubiak, Mason A Howard, Anuj J Prajapati, Niriham M Shah, Nihar N Patel, Paola M Rivera, Roksana B Zak, Jeffrey T Schmidt, Michael A Trevino
{"title":"Central and peripheral fatigue indices following resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction among people with multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Ethan C Hill, Christopher E Proppe, Sean M Lubiak, Mason A Howard, Anuj J Prajapati, Niriham M Shah, Nihar N Patel, Paola M Rivera, Roksana B Zak, Jeffrey T Schmidt, Michael A Trevino","doi":"10.1152/jn.00197.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Muscle fatigue is a prevalent and challenging symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), typically involving pronounced central (e.g., reduced corticospinal excitability) and relatively lower peripheral contributions (e.g., metabolic stress) compared with healthy controls. Blood flow restriction (BFR) applied during resistance exercise is an innovative approach to facilitate exercise benefits among PwMS. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine how distinct resistance exercise approaches including low-load (LL), LL with blood flow restriction (LLBFR), and high-load (HL) affect central and peripheral fatigue when applied in a clinically relevant, real-world context. Twelve females (42 ± 12 yr) and three males (41 ± 10 yr) with MS performed unilateral leg extensions with a HL [3 × 12 at 70% of one repetition maximum (1RM)], LL (1 × 30, 3 × 15 at 30% 1RM), and LLBFR (LL with 60% limb occlusion pressure). Prior to and immediately after each exercise bout, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque and indices of central [surface electromyographic (sEMG) amplitude, superimposed twitch torque (STT), V<sub>WAVE</sub>/M<sub>WAVE</sub>] and peripheral [potentiated twitch torque (PTT)] fatigue were assessed. There were similar acute decreases in MVIC torque (-21.0% relative to baseline; <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>g</i> = 1.486), but exercise-specific decreases in PTT between LLBFR (-37.1%; <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>g</i> = 1.135) and HL (-14.2%; <i>P</i> = 0.093, <i>g</i> = 0.440). STT increased (+24.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.018, <i>g</i> = 0.650), whereas there were decreases in sEMG amplitude (-9.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.004, <i>g</i> = 0.852) and V<sub>WAVE</sub>/M<sub>WAVE</sub> (-7.9%; <i>P</i> < 0.001, <i>g</i> = 1.037) that were not different among conditions. LLBFR may represent a more effective resistance exercise strategy for PwMS due to its ability to induce greater peripheral fatigue, a proxy for metabolic stress.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (LLBFR) uniquely elevates peripheral fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), a population which typically experiences increased central fatigue mechanisms. Although high- and low-load protocols evoked mixed central and peripheral fatigue, LLBFR was distinctly associated with peripheral fatigue potentially reflecting the metabolite trapping provoked by the occlusive stimulus. These findings suggest that low-load resistance exercise, particularly LLBFR, may provide innovative strategies to enhance exercise efficacy in PwMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"843-855"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00197.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muscle fatigue is a prevalent and challenging symptom in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), typically involving pronounced central (e.g., reduced corticospinal excitability) and relatively lower peripheral contributions (e.g., metabolic stress) compared with healthy controls. Blood flow restriction (BFR) applied during resistance exercise is an innovative approach to facilitate exercise benefits among PwMS. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was to examine how distinct resistance exercise approaches including low-load (LL), LL with blood flow restriction (LLBFR), and high-load (HL) affect central and peripheral fatigue when applied in a clinically relevant, real-world context. Twelve females (42 ± 12 yr) and three males (41 ± 10 yr) with MS performed unilateral leg extensions with a HL [3 × 12 at 70% of one repetition maximum (1RM)], LL (1 × 30, 3 × 15 at 30% 1RM), and LLBFR (LL with 60% limb occlusion pressure). Prior to and immediately after each exercise bout, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) torque and indices of central [surface electromyographic (sEMG) amplitude, superimposed twitch torque (STT), VWAVE/MWAVE] and peripheral [potentiated twitch torque (PTT)] fatigue were assessed. There were similar acute decreases in MVIC torque (-21.0% relative to baseline; P < 0.001, g = 1.486), but exercise-specific decreases in PTT between LLBFR (-37.1%; P < 0.001, g = 1.135) and HL (-14.2%; P = 0.093, g = 0.440). STT increased (+24.5%, P = 0.018, g = 0.650), whereas there were decreases in sEMG amplitude (-9.7%; P = 0.004, g = 0.852) and VWAVE/MWAVE (-7.9%; P < 0.001, g = 1.037) that were not different among conditions. LLBFR may represent a more effective resistance exercise strategy for PwMS due to its ability to induce greater peripheral fatigue, a proxy for metabolic stress.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction (LLBFR) uniquely elevates peripheral fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), a population which typically experiences increased central fatigue mechanisms. Although high- and low-load protocols evoked mixed central and peripheral fatigue, LLBFR was distinctly associated with peripheral fatigue potentially reflecting the metabolite trapping provoked by the occlusive stimulus. These findings suggest that low-load resistance exercise, particularly LLBFR, may provide innovative strategies to enhance exercise efficacy in PwMS.

多发性硬化症患者伴及不伴血流限制阻力运动后的中枢和外周疲劳指数。
简介:肌肉疲劳是多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者的一种普遍且具有挑战性的症状,与健康对照相比,通常包括明显的中枢(如皮质脊髓兴奋性降低)和相对较低的外周贡献(如代谢应激)。在阻力运动中应用血流限制(BFR)是一种创新的方法,以促进PwMS的运动效益。因此,本研究的目的是研究不同的阻力运动方法,包括高负荷(HL)、低负荷(LL)和LL伴血流量限制(LLBFR),在临床相关的现实环境中如何影响中枢和外周疲劳。方法:12例女性(42±12岁)和3例男性(41±10岁)多发性硬化症患者行单侧伸腿术,分别为HL (3×12,最大重复次数为70% [1RM])、LL (1×30, 3×15,最大重复次数为30%)和LLBFR (LL,下肢闭塞压力为60%)。在每次运动之前和之后,评估最大自主等距收缩(MVIC)扭矩和中央(表面肌电图[sEMG]振幅,叠加抽搐扭矩[STT], VWAVE/MWAVE)和周围(增强抽搐扭矩[PTT])疲劳指数。结果:MVIC扭矩也有类似的急性下降(相对于基线- 21.0%;ppg=1.135)和HL (-14.2%;p = 0.093 g = 0.440)。STT升高(+24.5%,p=0.018, g=0.650),肌电信号振幅下降(-9.7%;p=0.004, g=0.852)和VWAVE/MWAVE (-7.9%;结论:LLBFR可能是一种更有效的PwMS阻力运动策略,因为它能够诱导更大的外周疲劳,这是代谢应激的代表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信