Modification of reported antibiotic susceptibility testing according to the EUCAST recommendations: Evaluation of the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a university hospital.
C About, F Meyer, M Simon, E Jeanbert, B Demore, A Charmillon
{"title":"Modification of reported antibiotic susceptibility testing according to the EUCAST recommendations: Evaluation of the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in a university hospital.","authors":"C About, F Meyer, M Simon, E Jeanbert, B Demore, A Charmillon","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In January 2022, EUCAST guidelines recommending replacement of the \"intermediate\" category with a \"susceptible, increased exposure\" (SFP) category were implemented in our hospital. We aimed to assess the impact of these changes on antibiotic prescriptions for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective before-after study included adult inpatients with monobacterial infections between March-August 2021 (BEFORE) and March-August 2022 (AFTER). Antibiotic use and relevance were compared. Meropenem was masked when imipenem was categorized as SFP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 240 antibiotic susceptibility tests (195 patients). Infectious disease consultations increased significantly during implementation (53.0 % vs. 28.9 %, p = 0.0005). Meropenem prescriptions for P. aeruginosa declined (13.8 %-6.2 %), while high-dose regimens for SFP antibiotics likewise decreased (50.0 %-35.4 %). Overall, prescription appropriateness remained high (>92 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of SFP reporting was associated with increased ID consultation and a trend toward reduced broad-spectrum use, highlighting a need for targeted prescriber education.</p>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":" ","pages":"105130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idnow.2025.105130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: In January 2022, EUCAST guidelines recommending replacement of the "intermediate" category with a "susceptible, increased exposure" (SFP) category were implemented in our hospital. We aimed to assess the impact of these changes on antibiotic prescriptions for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Methods: This retrospective before-after study included adult inpatients with monobacterial infections between March-August 2021 (BEFORE) and March-August 2022 (AFTER). Antibiotic use and relevance were compared. Meropenem was masked when imipenem was categorized as SFP.
Results: We included 240 antibiotic susceptibility tests (195 patients). Infectious disease consultations increased significantly during implementation (53.0 % vs. 28.9 %, p = 0.0005). Meropenem prescriptions for P. aeruginosa declined (13.8 %-6.2 %), while high-dose regimens for SFP antibiotics likewise decreased (50.0 %-35.4 %). Overall, prescription appropriateness remained high (>92 %).
Conclusion: The introduction of SFP reporting was associated with increased ID consultation and a trend toward reduced broad-spectrum use, highlighting a need for targeted prescriber education.