Self-Reported Cannabis Prices and Expenditures From Legal and Illegal Sources Five Years After Legalisation of Non-Medical Cannabis in Canada

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Samantha Rundle, Daniel Danh Hong, Maryam Iraniparast, Vicki Rynard, Elle Wadsworth, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Beau Kilmer, David Hammond
{"title":"Self-Reported Cannabis Prices and Expenditures From Legal and Illegal Sources Five Years After Legalisation of Non-Medical Cannabis in Canada","authors":"Samantha Rundle,&nbsp;Daniel Danh Hong,&nbsp;Maryam Iraniparast,&nbsp;Vicki Rynard,&nbsp;Elle Wadsworth,&nbsp;Rosalie Liccardo Pacula,&nbsp;Beau Kilmer,&nbsp;David Hammond","doi":"10.1111/dar.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The price of cannabis has important implications for many outcomes discussed in legalisation debates. This paper reports on legal and illegal prices of different cannabis products.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>National surveys were conducted in 2022 and 2023 among Canadians aged 16–65 years as part of the International Cannabis Policy Study. Self-reported price, purchase quantity and legal versus illegal source of the‘last’ cannabis purchased was examined from 2686 respondents who used cannabis in the past 12 months for nine cannabis product types.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>On average, consumers report that 78% of all their cannabis came from legal sources in the past year. Differences in the self-reported price paid between legal and illegal purchases varied by product type. Price per unit was higher from legal sources for dried flower (+23.8%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), vapes (+18.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.006) and hash (+38.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and lower for capsules (−28.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found for drops (−3.3%. <i>p</i> = 0.76), edibles (+3.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.49), cannabis drinks (−8.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.21), concentrates (+13.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.15) and tinctures (−17.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.28). Substantial quantity discounts for dried flower were observed from both legal and illegal sources.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Differences between legal and illegal cannabis prices have narrowed considerably, likely due to declines in the price of cannabis from legal stores since the opening of legal markets in Canada. Some differences are expected across the two markets considering differences in standard quantities purchased and the presence of quantity discounts in these markets. Analyses omitting purchase quantity may overestimate the price differential between legal and illegal sources.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"44 6","pages":"1658-1665"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/dar.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The price of cannabis has important implications for many outcomes discussed in legalisation debates. This paper reports on legal and illegal prices of different cannabis products.

Methods

National surveys were conducted in 2022 and 2023 among Canadians aged 16–65 years as part of the International Cannabis Policy Study. Self-reported price, purchase quantity and legal versus illegal source of the‘last’ cannabis purchased was examined from 2686 respondents who used cannabis in the past 12 months for nine cannabis product types.

Results

On average, consumers report that 78% of all their cannabis came from legal sources in the past year. Differences in the self-reported price paid between legal and illegal purchases varied by product type. Price per unit was higher from legal sources for dried flower (+23.8%, p < 0.001), vapes (+18.7%, p = 0.006) and hash (+38.4%, p < 0.001), and lower for capsules (−28.4%, p = 0.008). No statistically significant difference was found for drops (−3.3%. p = 0.76), edibles (+3.9%, p = 0.49), cannabis drinks (−8.8%, p = 0.21), concentrates (+13.8%, p = 0.15) and tinctures (−17.0%, p = 0.28). Substantial quantity discounts for dried flower were observed from both legal and illegal sources.

Discussion and Conclusion

Differences between legal and illegal cannabis prices have narrowed considerably, likely due to declines in the price of cannabis from legal stores since the opening of legal markets in Canada. Some differences are expected across the two markets considering differences in standard quantities purchased and the presence of quantity discounts in these markets. Analyses omitting purchase quantity may overestimate the price differential between legal and illegal sources.

Abstract Image

在加拿大非医用大麻合法化五年后,自我报告的合法和非法来源的大麻价格和支出。
大麻的价格对合法化辩论中讨论的许多结果具有重要影响。本文报道了不同大麻产品的合法和非法价格。方法:作为国际大麻政策研究的一部分,在2022年和2023年对16-65岁的加拿大人进行了全国性调查。2686名受访者在过去12个月内使用过9种大麻产品,调查了他们自我报告的价格、购买数量以及“最后一次”购买大麻的合法与非法来源。结果:平均而言,消费者报告去年78%的大麻来自合法来源。合法和非法购买之间的自我报告价格差异因产品类型而异。讨论和结论:合法和非法大麻价格之间的差异已经大大缩小,可能是由于加拿大合法市场开放以来合法商店的大麻价格下降。考虑到标准采购数量的差异以及这些市场中数量折扣的存在,预计两个市场之间会存在一些差异。分析忽略采购数量可能会高估合法和非法来源之间的价格差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信