Theta burst stimulation (TBS) in methamphetamine use disorder: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Gopalkumar Rakesh, Thomas G Adams, Dylan H Ballard, Christopher J McLouth, Craig R Rush
{"title":"Theta burst stimulation (TBS) in methamphetamine use disorder: a meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Gopalkumar Rakesh, Thomas G Adams, Dylan H Ballard, Christopher J McLouth, Craig R Rush","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2025.2541165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) currently lacks FDA-approved treatments. Previous studies involving transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L.dlPFC) have shown promise in TMS's effectiveness at decreasing craving for methamphetamine. Theta burst stimulation (TBS), which includes intermittent (iTBS) and continuous (cTBS) protocols, is increasingly being used for substance use disorders, including MUD. Previous reviews of TMS in MUD performed subgroup meta-analyses of studies that delivered TBS in MUD. However, these meta-analyses included studies with overlapping participant cohorts, limiting their validity. To address this limitation, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using unique patient cohorts from PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar until September 1, 2024, comparing the impact of TBS versus sham on cue-induced methamphetamine craving in patients with MUD. We performed a meta-analysis with four eligible RCTs that delivered iTBS. Results suggest iTBS was more effective in reducing cue-induced methamphetamine craving than sham iTBS (standardized mean difference [SMD] in change = 1.04; 95% CI [0.16, 1.92]). Two additional RCTs without sham control arms were reviewed, and one demonstrated a significant reduction in craving following accelerated iTBS. Future studies should examine whether neuroimaging-targeted iTBS can impact outcome measures other than craving, such as methamphetamine use, by measuring return to use. Exploring accelerated iTBS and cTBS for MUD, targeting alternative cortical sites such as the frontal pole, and studying their effects on relevant MUD biomarkers is also pertinent. This review demonstrates the effectiveness of TBS for MUD, emphasizing its potential to advance treatment options for MUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2025.2541165","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) currently lacks FDA-approved treatments. Previous studies involving transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L.dlPFC) have shown promise in TMS's effectiveness at decreasing craving for methamphetamine. Theta burst stimulation (TBS), which includes intermittent (iTBS) and continuous (cTBS) protocols, is increasingly being used for substance use disorders, including MUD. Previous reviews of TMS in MUD performed subgroup meta-analyses of studies that delivered TBS in MUD. However, these meta-analyses included studies with overlapping participant cohorts, limiting their validity. To address this limitation, we reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using unique patient cohorts from PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Google Scholar until September 1, 2024, comparing the impact of TBS versus sham on cue-induced methamphetamine craving in patients with MUD. We performed a meta-analysis with four eligible RCTs that delivered iTBS. Results suggest iTBS was more effective in reducing cue-induced methamphetamine craving than sham iTBS (standardized mean difference [SMD] in change = 1.04; 95% CI [0.16, 1.92]). Two additional RCTs without sham control arms were reviewed, and one demonstrated a significant reduction in craving following accelerated iTBS. Future studies should examine whether neuroimaging-targeted iTBS can impact outcome measures other than craving, such as methamphetamine use, by measuring return to use. Exploring accelerated iTBS and cTBS for MUD, targeting alternative cortical sites such as the frontal pole, and studying their effects on relevant MUD biomarkers is also pertinent. This review demonstrates the effectiveness of TBS for MUD, emphasizing its potential to advance treatment options for MUD.

θ波爆发刺激(TBS)在甲基苯丙胺使用障碍中的应用:荟萃分析和系统回顾。
甲基苯丙胺使用障碍(MUD)目前缺乏fda批准的治疗方法。先前涉及经颅磁刺激(TMS)在左背外侧前额叶皮层(L.dlPFC)的研究已经显示出TMS在减少对甲基苯丙胺的渴望方面的有效性。包括间歇(iTBS)和连续(cTBS)方案的θ波爆发刺激(TBS)越来越多地用于药物使用障碍,包括MUD。先前关于经颅磁刺激治疗MUD的综述对在MUD中实施TBS的研究进行了亚组荟萃分析。然而,这些荟萃分析包括有重叠参与者队列的研究,限制了它们的有效性。为了解决这一局限性,我们回顾了截至2024年9月1日的随机对照试验(rct),这些试验使用来自PubMed/Medline、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar的独特患者队列,比较了TBS与假手术对线索诱导的MUD患者甲基苯丙胺渴望的影响。我们对4个提供iTBS的符合条件的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。结果表明,iTBS比假iTBS更有效地减少线索诱导的甲基苯丙胺渴望(变化的标准化平均差[SMD] = 1.04;95% ci[0.16, 1.92])。另外两项没有假对照的随机对照试验被回顾,其中一项显示加速iTBS后渴望显著减少。未来的研究应该检查神经成像为目标的iTBS是否可以通过测量重新使用甲基苯丙胺来影响除渴望之外的其他结果测量。探索加速iTBS和cTBS治疗MUD,靶向其他皮质部位,如额极,并研究它们对相关MUD生物标志物的影响也是相关的。这篇综述证明了TBS治疗MUD的有效性,强调了其推进MUD治疗方案的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信