Daily Movement Activities Are Associated With Within-Person Instability of Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Evidence From an Ambulatory Assessment Study.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf059
Chih-Hsiang Yang, Donald Hedeker, Jongwon Lee, Halle Prine, Donna Coffman, Jingkai Wei, Jonathan George Hakun
{"title":"Daily Movement Activities Are Associated With Within-Person Instability of Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Evidence From an Ambulatory Assessment Study.","authors":"Chih-Hsiang Yang, Donald Hedeker, Jongwon Lee, Halle Prine, Donna Coffman, Jingkai Wei, Jonathan George Hakun","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Physical inactivity and excessive sedentary time (ST) are associated with poor cognitive health in older adults. However, current literature largely relies on cross-sectional designs or in-lab cognitive assessments, which do not adequately reflect cognitive function in naturalistic settings. Further, existing studies have largely overlooked the variability or the instability in daily cognitive function, which represents a critical marker of cognitive decline. This ambulatory assessment study examined the temporal associations of daily movement behaviors with the mean levels and the variability of cognition among older adults at risk of dementia.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>96 older adults from the community (68.3 ± 7.1 years) participated in this 14-day study. They wore an accelerometer and completed smartphone-based cognitive tests up to 4 times per day. The cognitive tests assessed both performance-based and subjective cognition. The movement behaviors collected from the accelerometers include daily light-intensity physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and ST. Mixed-effects location-scale models were applied to estimate the within- and between-person associations of movement behaviors and cognitive outcomes in terms of the mean levels and the degree of variability. A total of 1,269 day-level observations were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults' between-person levels of daily MVPA and steps were associated with better mean cognitive performance and lower variability across cognitive measures. Older adults' daily LPA was positively associated with subjective cognition in both mean levels and variability. The increases in within-person levels of ST were negatively associated with older adults' variability of all cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Study results suggest that moving more and sitting less in day-to-day life may sustain proximal cognitive health. Applying ambulatory assessments can advance aging research by examining the temporal dynamics between daily movement activities and within-person variability of cognition to inform strategies for promoting healthy aging in daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 6","pages":"igaf059"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Physical inactivity and excessive sedentary time (ST) are associated with poor cognitive health in older adults. However, current literature largely relies on cross-sectional designs or in-lab cognitive assessments, which do not adequately reflect cognitive function in naturalistic settings. Further, existing studies have largely overlooked the variability or the instability in daily cognitive function, which represents a critical marker of cognitive decline. This ambulatory assessment study examined the temporal associations of daily movement behaviors with the mean levels and the variability of cognition among older adults at risk of dementia.

Research design and methods: 96 older adults from the community (68.3 ± 7.1 years) participated in this 14-day study. They wore an accelerometer and completed smartphone-based cognitive tests up to 4 times per day. The cognitive tests assessed both performance-based and subjective cognition. The movement behaviors collected from the accelerometers include daily light-intensity physical activity (LPA), moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and ST. Mixed-effects location-scale models were applied to estimate the within- and between-person associations of movement behaviors and cognitive outcomes in terms of the mean levels and the degree of variability. A total of 1,269 day-level observations were analyzed.

Results: Older adults' between-person levels of daily MVPA and steps were associated with better mean cognitive performance and lower variability across cognitive measures. Older adults' daily LPA was positively associated with subjective cognition in both mean levels and variability. The increases in within-person levels of ST were negatively associated with older adults' variability of all cognitive outcomes.

Discussion and implications: Study results suggest that moving more and sitting less in day-to-day life may sustain proximal cognitive health. Applying ambulatory assessments can advance aging research by examining the temporal dynamics between daily movement activities and within-person variability of cognition to inform strategies for promoting healthy aging in daily life.

日常运动活动与老年人认知功能的个人不稳定有关:来自门诊评估研究的证据。
背景和目的:缺乏身体活动和久坐时间(ST)与老年人认知健康状况不佳有关。然而,目前的文献主要依赖于横断面设计或实验室认知评估,这并不能充分反映自然环境下的认知功能。此外,现有的研究在很大程度上忽略了日常认知功能的变异性或不稳定性,这是认知能力下降的关键标志。这项动态评估研究检查了日常运动行为与痴呆风险老年人平均水平和认知变异性的时间关联。研究设计与方法:96名来自社区的老年人(68.3±7.1岁)参加了为期14天的研究。他们佩戴加速度计,每天完成多达4次基于智能手机的认知测试。认知测试评估了基于表现的认知和主观认知。从加速度计收集的运动行为包括每日轻强度身体活动(LPA)、中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)和ST.混合效应位置尺度模型用于估计运动行为与认知结果之间的平均水平和变异性程度的关联。总共分析了1269个日间观测数据。结果:老年人每日MVPA和步数的人间水平与更好的平均认知表现和更低的认知测量变异性相关。老年人每日LPA与主观认知在平均水平和变异性上均呈正相关。体内ST水平的增加与老年人所有认知结果的变异性呈负相关。讨论和启示:研究结果表明,在日常生活中多运动少坐可以维持近端认知健康。应用动态评估可以通过检查日常运动活动和个人认知变异性之间的时间动态来推进老龄化研究,从而为促进日常生活中的健康老龄化提供策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信