Association between self-reported behavioral habits and their respective behavioral risk factors in individuals with metabolic syndrome.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Elizabeth R Chamberlain, Lynda H Powell, Kelly Karavolos, Bryce T Daniels, Nicole Trabold, Caitlyn L Wilson, Jacinda M Nicklas, Kevin S Masters
{"title":"Association between self-reported behavioral habits and their respective behavioral risk factors in individuals with metabolic syndrome.","authors":"Elizabeth R Chamberlain, Lynda H Powell, Kelly Karavolos, Bryce T Daniels, Nicole Trabold, Caitlyn L Wilson, Jacinda M Nicklas, Kevin S Masters","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to measure the degree to which simple automatic habits assessed with the Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) are associated with validated measures of complex behavioral risk factors in an at-risk population of those with metabolic syndrome (MetS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At baseline (2019-2022), 618 participants from 5 US cities who met criteria for MetS to qualify for the ELM trial were administered a series of measures to assess 4 habits (1/2 plate of vegetables at meals, daily brisk walks, pause before reacting, and notice sensory experiences) and 5 behavioral risk factors the habits were intended to represent (vegetable intake, moderate intensity physical activity, daily steps, emotional regulation, and sensory awareness). Spearman's rho correlations between each habit measure and its concomitant behavioral risk factor were calculated to assess criterion validity, spillover to other related behavioral risk factors, and discriminant validity relative to the Perceived Stress Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three of the four habits showed moderate correlations with their respective risk factors with ranges from r = 0.31 to r = 0.44 (all p < 0.001). The strongest association was an inverse correlation between the habit pause before reacting and perceived stress (r = -0.34, p < 0.001). The weakest associations were between the physical activity habit and accelerometer-assessed moderate intensity physical activity (r = 0.16) and daily steps (r = 0.18), both p < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports a correspondence between habits assessed by the SRHI and the more complex behavioral risk factors they are intended to represent. It justifies targeting simple habits in service of improving complex behavioral risk factors and managing clinical problems such as MetS.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108255"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this paper is to measure the degree to which simple automatic habits assessed with the Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) are associated with validated measures of complex behavioral risk factors in an at-risk population of those with metabolic syndrome (MetS).

Methods: At baseline (2019-2022), 618 participants from 5 US cities who met criteria for MetS to qualify for the ELM trial were administered a series of measures to assess 4 habits (1/2 plate of vegetables at meals, daily brisk walks, pause before reacting, and notice sensory experiences) and 5 behavioral risk factors the habits were intended to represent (vegetable intake, moderate intensity physical activity, daily steps, emotional regulation, and sensory awareness). Spearman's rho correlations between each habit measure and its concomitant behavioral risk factor were calculated to assess criterion validity, spillover to other related behavioral risk factors, and discriminant validity relative to the Perceived Stress Scale.

Results: Three of the four habits showed moderate correlations with their respective risk factors with ranges from r = 0.31 to r = 0.44 (all p < 0.001). The strongest association was an inverse correlation between the habit pause before reacting and perceived stress (r = -0.34, p < 0.001). The weakest associations were between the physical activity habit and accelerometer-assessed moderate intensity physical activity (r = 0.16) and daily steps (r = 0.18), both p < 0.001.

Conclusions: This study supports a correspondence between habits assessed by the SRHI and the more complex behavioral risk factors they are intended to represent. It justifies targeting simple habits in service of improving complex behavioral risk factors and managing clinical problems such as MetS.

代谢综合征患者自我报告的行为习惯与各自行为危险因素的关系
目的:本文的目的是衡量在代谢综合征(MetS)高危人群中,用自我报告习惯指数(SRHI)评估的简单自动习惯与有效的复杂行为危险因素测量的关联程度。方法:在基线(2019-2022年),来自美国5个城市的618名符合met标准的参与者接受了一系列措施,以评估4种习惯(用餐时半盘蔬菜、每天快走、反应前暂停、注意感官体验)和5种行为风险因素,这些习惯旨在代表(蔬菜摄入量、中等强度的身体活动、每日步数、情绪调节和感官意识)。计算每个习惯测量与其伴随的行为风险因素之间的Spearman rho相关性,以评估标准效度,对其他相关行为风险因素的溢出,以及相对于感知压力量表的判别效度。结果:四种习惯中有三种与各自的危险因素呈中等相关性,r = 0.31 ~ 0.44(均p < 0.001)。最强烈的关联是反应前习惯暂停与感知压力之间的负相关(r = -0.34, p < 0.001)。体力活动习惯与加速度计评估的中等强度体力活动(r = 0.16)和每日步数(r = 0.18)之间的关联最弱,p均< 0.001。结论:本研究支持SRHI评估的习惯与它们所代表的更复杂的行为风险因素之间的对应关系。它证明了以简单的习惯为目标来改善复杂的行为风险因素和管理临床问题(如met)是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信