Current practice, challenges and future opportunities in the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in genetically modified plants

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Josep Casacuberta, Francisco Barro, Albert Braeuning, Ruud de Maagd, Michelle M. Epstein, Thomas Frenzel, Jean-Luc Gallois, Frits Koning, Antoine Messéan, F. Javier Moreno, Fabien Nogué, Giovanni Savoini, Alan H. Schulman, Christoph Tebbe, Eve Veromann, Michele Ardizzone, Luca Belmonte, Martina Bonatti, Ian Dewhurst, Ivan Dimitrov, Arianna Ferrari, Tilemachos Goumperis, Kevin Hogeveen, Aleksandra Lewandowska, Robin Ornsrud, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos, Tommaso Raffaello, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Elisabeth Waigmann, Elena Sánchez-Brunete, Antonio Fernandez Dumont
{"title":"Current practice, challenges and future opportunities in the safety assessment of newly expressed proteins in genetically modified plants","authors":"EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),&nbsp;Josep Casacuberta,&nbsp;Francisco Barro,&nbsp;Albert Braeuning,&nbsp;Ruud de Maagd,&nbsp;Michelle M. Epstein,&nbsp;Thomas Frenzel,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Gallois,&nbsp;Frits Koning,&nbsp;Antoine Messéan,&nbsp;F. Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Fabien Nogué,&nbsp;Giovanni Savoini,&nbsp;Alan H. Schulman,&nbsp;Christoph Tebbe,&nbsp;Eve Veromann,&nbsp;Michele Ardizzone,&nbsp;Luca Belmonte,&nbsp;Martina Bonatti,&nbsp;Ian Dewhurst,&nbsp;Ivan Dimitrov,&nbsp;Arianna Ferrari,&nbsp;Tilemachos Goumperis,&nbsp;Kevin Hogeveen,&nbsp;Aleksandra Lewandowska,&nbsp;Robin Ornsrud,&nbsp;Nikoletta Papadopoulou,&nbsp;Konstantinos Paraskevopoulos,&nbsp;Tommaso Raffaello,&nbsp;Reinhilde Schoonjans,&nbsp;Elisabeth Waigmann,&nbsp;Elena Sánchez-Brunete,&nbsp;Antonio Fernandez Dumont","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Current risk assessment strategies for protein safety of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified (GM) plants are based on chemical risk assessment principles and Codex Alimentarius guidelines for biotech-derived foods, initially published in 2003. These guidelines were designed for proteins with multiple testing options and for GMOs expressing a low number of NEPs. However, two decades of experience in assessing GMO and biotech products, along with recent advances in the field, underscore the need to update best practices for protein safety assessment. Furthermore, new types of products challenge the application of the current international guidelines, as assessments become more complex due to NEPs that are difficult to test using existing approaches or products with numerous NEPs. This document outlines a strategy that strengthens the stepwise, weight-of-evidence approach, incorporating new methodologies as complementary or alternative studies. An improved strategy for protein safety assessment could include: (1) considering history of safe use (HoSU), read-across and phylogeny defining the type of data required and remove the need for specific in vitro or in vivo studies; (2) applying advanced in silico tools, including predictive computational models and improved phylogenetic analysis to enable more accurate comparisons with known allergens, toxins or ‘safe’ proteins; (3) using standardised in vitro gastrointestinal models that replicate physiological conditions; (4) developing targeted in vivo studies; (5) evaluating the role of exposure in the safety assessment; and, where necessary, (6) considering post-market monitoring for risk characterisation. Consensus on the definition of HoSU and the effective integration of novel methodologies into the current NEP safety assessment will be essential to meet society's demand for safer, healthier and more sustainable food/feed in a growing world. This calls for revisiting and refining the goals of protein safety risk assessment to ensure that NEPs in biotech products are evaluated appropriately, consistently and proportionately.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9568","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current risk assessment strategies for protein safety of newly expressed proteins (NEPs) in genetically modified (GM) plants are based on chemical risk assessment principles and Codex Alimentarius guidelines for biotech-derived foods, initially published in 2003. These guidelines were designed for proteins with multiple testing options and for GMOs expressing a low number of NEPs. However, two decades of experience in assessing GMO and biotech products, along with recent advances in the field, underscore the need to update best practices for protein safety assessment. Furthermore, new types of products challenge the application of the current international guidelines, as assessments become more complex due to NEPs that are difficult to test using existing approaches or products with numerous NEPs. This document outlines a strategy that strengthens the stepwise, weight-of-evidence approach, incorporating new methodologies as complementary or alternative studies. An improved strategy for protein safety assessment could include: (1) considering history of safe use (HoSU), read-across and phylogeny defining the type of data required and remove the need for specific in vitro or in vivo studies; (2) applying advanced in silico tools, including predictive computational models and improved phylogenetic analysis to enable more accurate comparisons with known allergens, toxins or ‘safe’ proteins; (3) using standardised in vitro gastrointestinal models that replicate physiological conditions; (4) developing targeted in vivo studies; (5) evaluating the role of exposure in the safety assessment; and, where necessary, (6) considering post-market monitoring for risk characterisation. Consensus on the definition of HoSU and the effective integration of novel methodologies into the current NEP safety assessment will be essential to meet society's demand for safer, healthier and more sustainable food/feed in a growing world. This calls for revisiting and refining the goals of protein safety risk assessment to ensure that NEPs in biotech products are evaluated appropriately, consistently and proportionately.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

转基因植物新表达蛋白安全性评估的现状、挑战和未来机遇
目前对转基因植物中新表达蛋白(NEPs)蛋白质安全性的风险评估策略是基于化学风险评估原则和2003年首次出版的国际食品法典委员会生物技术衍生食品指南。这些指南是为具有多种检测选择的蛋白质和表达少量NEPs的转基因生物设计的。然而,二十年来评估转基因生物和生物技术产品的经验,以及该领域的最新进展,强调需要更新蛋白质安全性评估的最佳实践。此外,新型产品对当前国际准则的应用提出了挑战,因为新能源产品难以使用现有方法或具有众多新能源产品进行测试,因此评估变得更加复杂。本文件概述了一项加强渐进式证据权重方法的战略,将新方法作为补充或替代研究纳入其中。一种改进的蛋白质安全性评估策略可以包括:(1)考虑安全使用史(HoSU)、解读和系统发育,确定所需数据的类型,并消除对特定体外或体内研究的需要;(2)应用先进的计算机工具,包括预测计算模型和改进的系统发育分析,以便与已知的过敏原、毒素或“安全”蛋白质进行更准确的比较;(3)采用可复制生理条件的标准化体外胃肠模型;(4)开展有针对性的体内研究;(5)评价暴露在安全评价中的作用;必要时,(6)考虑对风险特征进行上市后监测。在人口不断增长的世界中,要满足社会对更安全、更健康和更可持续的食品/饲料的需求,必须就HoSU的定义达成共识,并将新方法有效地纳入当前的新经济政策安全评估。这就要求重新审视和完善蛋白质安全风险评估的目标,以确保对生物技术产品中的nep进行适当、一致和相称的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信