Online Health Literacy Resources for People With Intellectual Disability: A Grey Literature Scoping Review.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jessica Keeley, Zhenmei Yeap, Rachel Skoss, Thomas Nevill, Susan Hunt, Jacinta Saldaris, Jenny Downs
{"title":"Online Health Literacy Resources for People With Intellectual Disability: A Grey Literature Scoping Review.","authors":"Jessica Keeley, Zhenmei Yeap, Rachel Skoss, Thomas Nevill, Susan Hunt, Jacinta Saldaris, Jenny Downs","doi":"10.1111/jir.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with intellectual disability experience higher rates of physical and mental health problems than those without intellectual disability. Health literacy includes accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health information. Improving health literacy is associated with better health outcomes. The internet is a primary source of health information for many people. This study aimed to evaluate available online health resources for people with intellectual disability and their families to understand information gaps.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A scoping review of grey literature was conducted using two searches: a targeted search of disability organisation websites and an advanced Google search using key terms. The methods were guided by a modified version of Arksey and O'Malley's methodological approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1165 health resources for people with intellectual disability and their families were identified. Tests, checks and procedures were the most common category of health addressed (n = 227, 19.5%) and most content was directed at the individual with intellectual disability (n = 837, 71.9%). Resources addressed the health literacy domains of accessing (n = 1165, 100%) and understanding (n = 1132, 97.2%) information more often than appraising (n = 575, 49.5%) and applying (n = 415, 35.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving the health literacy of people with intellectual disability is an important part of addressing health disparities and requires understanding of the available information. Some information gaps were identified, including limited sexual health resources and mental health resources for adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disability experience higher rates of physical and mental health problems than those without intellectual disability. Health literacy includes accessing, understanding, appraising and applying health information. Improving health literacy is associated with better health outcomes. The internet is a primary source of health information for many people. This study aimed to evaluate available online health resources for people with intellectual disability and their families to understand information gaps.

Method: A scoping review of grey literature was conducted using two searches: a targeted search of disability organisation websites and an advanced Google search using key terms. The methods were guided by a modified version of Arksey and O'Malley's methodological approach.

Results: A total of 1165 health resources for people with intellectual disability and their families were identified. Tests, checks and procedures were the most common category of health addressed (n = 227, 19.5%) and most content was directed at the individual with intellectual disability (n = 837, 71.9%). Resources addressed the health literacy domains of accessing (n = 1165, 100%) and understanding (n = 1132, 97.2%) information more often than appraising (n = 575, 49.5%) and applying (n = 415, 35.6%).

Conclusions: Improving the health literacy of people with intellectual disability is an important part of addressing health disparities and requires understanding of the available information. Some information gaps were identified, including limited sexual health resources and mental health resources for adolescents.

智障人士在线健康素养资源:灰色文献综述
背景:智力残疾者的身心健康问题发生率高于无智力残疾者。健康素养包括获取、理解、评价和应用健康信息。提高卫生知识素养与改善健康结果有关。互联网是许多人获取健康信息的主要来源。本研究旨在评估智障人士及其家庭可用的在线健康资源,以了解信息差距。方法:对灰色文献进行范围审查,使用两个搜索:残疾人组织网站的目标搜索和使用关键术语的高级谷歌搜索。这些方法是由Arksey和O'Malley的方法方法的修改版本指导的。结果:共确定智障人士及其家庭卫生资源1165个。测试、检查和程序是最常见的健康类别(n = 227, 19.5%),大多数内容针对智力残疾个体(n = 837, 71.9%)。资源更多地涉及获取(n = 1165, 100%)和理解(n = 1132, 97.2%)信息的健康素养领域,而不是评价(n = 575, 49.5%)和应用(n = 415, 35.6%)。结论:提高智力残疾者的健康素养是解决健康差距的重要组成部分,需要了解现有信息。发现了一些信息缺口,包括青少年性健康资源和心理健康资源有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信