Longitudinal analysis of e-cigarette and cannabis dual use in an Ohio sample of adolescents and young adults

IF 3.6 2区医学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Addictive behaviors Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108444

Vitoria B. Spinola , Jill M. Singer , Elizabeth G. Klein , Theodore L. Wagener , Marielle C. Brinkman , Alayna P. Tackett , Bo Lu , Dylan D. Wagner , Loren E. Wold , Megan E. Roberts

{"title":"Longitudinal analysis of e-cigarette and cannabis dual use in an Ohio sample of adolescents and young adults","authors":"Vitoria B. Spinola , Jill M. Singer , Elizabeth G. Klein , Theodore L. Wagener , Marielle C. Brinkman , Alayna P. Tackett , Bo Lu , Dylan D. Wagner , Loren E. Wold , Megan E. Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adolescents and young adults (AYA) who vape e-cigarettes are likely to use cannabis (“dual use”), but little research has examined factors influencing future use pattern-. Using longitudinal data from 551 Ohio AYA (aged 15–24) who reported past-3-month e-cigarette use, we explored associations between baseline dual use and continued e-cigarette and cannabis use one year later, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. At baseline, 42.3 % of participants reported past-30-day cannabis use, indicating a high prevalence of dual use within this sample. Logistic regressions revealed that past-30-day tobacco use predicted continued e-cigarette use (OR = 1.97), but dual use at baseline was not a significant predictor. However, baseline dual use (OR = 4.58), lifetime cannabis use (OR = 3.91), and Sexual and Gender Minority status (OR = 2.57) significantly predicted continued cannabis use. These findings highlight the importance of addressing dual use in prevention efforts, as dual use at baseline was a strong predictor of continued cannabis use one year later—particularly among historically marginalized groups and those with prior cannabis exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 108444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460325002059","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescents and young adults (AYA) who vape e-cigarettes are likely to use cannabis (“dual use”), but little research has examined factors influencing future use pattern-. Using longitudinal data from 551 Ohio AYA (aged 15–24) who reported past-3-month e-cigarette use, we explored associations between baseline dual use and continued e-cigarette and cannabis use one year later, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. At baseline, 42.3 % of participants reported past-30-day cannabis use, indicating a high prevalence of dual use within this sample. Logistic regressions revealed that past-30-day tobacco use predicted continued e-cigarette use (OR = 1.97), but dual use at baseline was not a significant predictor. However, baseline dual use (OR = 4.58), lifetime cannabis use (OR = 3.91), and Sexual and Gender Minority status (OR = 2.57) significantly predicted continued cannabis use. These findings highlight the importance of addressing dual use in prevention efforts, as dual use at baseline was a strong predictor of continued cannabis use one year later—particularly among historically marginalized groups and those with prior cannabis exposure.

查看原文本刊更多论文

电子烟和大麻双重使用在俄亥俄州青少年和年轻人样本的纵向分析

吸电子烟的青少年和年轻人（AYA）可能会使用大麻（“双重用途”），但很少有研究调查影响未来使用模式的因素。利用551名俄亥俄州青少年（15-24岁）报告了过去3个月使用电子烟的纵向数据，我们探讨了基线双重使用与一年后继续使用电子烟和大麻之间的关系，并根据社会人口因素进行了调整。在基线时，42.3%的参与者报告了过去30天的大麻使用情况，表明该样本中双重使用的患病率很高。Logistic回归显示，过去30天的烟草使用预测了持续的电子烟使用（OR = 1.97），但基线时的双重使用并不是一个显著的预测因子。然而，基线双重使用（OR = 4.58）、终生大麻使用（OR = 3.91）和性少数和性别少数状态（OR = 2.57）显著预测大麻的持续使用。这些发现强调了在预防工作中解决双重使用问题的重要性，因为基线双重使用是一年后继续使用大麻的有力预测因素，特别是在历史上被边缘化的群体和之前接触过大麻的人群中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Addictive behaviors 医学-药物滥用

CiteScore

8.40

自引率

4.50%

发文量

283

审稿时长

46 days

期刊介绍： Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings. Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.