Promoting Publication Readiness in Nurse Leaders: Findings From a Pilot Educational Intervention.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Deborah D Brabham, Kerin A Da Cruz, Jennifer Nitschmann, Cynthia Parks, Aftan Novak, Marie Guillaume, Kimberly Purtill
{"title":"Promoting Publication Readiness in Nurse Leaders: Findings From a Pilot Educational Intervention.","authors":"Deborah D Brabham, Kerin A Da Cruz, Jennifer Nitschmann, Cynthia Parks, Aftan Novak, Marie Guillaume, Kimberly Purtill","doi":"10.3928/00220124-20250718-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nurse leaders at a Magnet<sup>®</sup>-designated, high-volume, Level I trauma teaching hospital demonstrate a commitment to advancing new knowledge, innovations, and improvements in nursing practice. Despite these contributions, their work seldom gains recognition through scholarly publication.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A pilot study using a pretest/posttest descriptive design was conducted to evaluate nurse leaders' perceptions of and confidence in the scholarly publication process after an educational intervention consisting of an interactive presentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 nurse leaders completed the presurvey to assess baseline familiarity, understanding, and confidence, and 24 completed the postsurvey after the intervention. Familiarity with the publication process increased from 18% to 67% (<i>p</i> < .001), and understanding improved from 41% to 80% (<i>p</i> = .007). Comfort with team writing also increased, from 59% to 88% (<i>p</i> = .0346). Mentorship and checklists were the most frequently selected support resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Targeted educational interventions can empower and inspire nurse leaders to engage in scholarly publishing by enhancing confidence and understanding of the process. Sustained initiatives, such as mentorship and structured resources, are vital for cultivating a culture of nursing scholarship.</p>","PeriodicalId":49295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing","volume":"56 8","pages":"344-348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20250718-06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nurse leaders at a Magnet®-designated, high-volume, Level I trauma teaching hospital demonstrate a commitment to advancing new knowledge, innovations, and improvements in nursing practice. Despite these contributions, their work seldom gains recognition through scholarly publication.

Method: A pilot study using a pretest/posttest descriptive design was conducted to evaluate nurse leaders' perceptions of and confidence in the scholarly publication process after an educational intervention consisting of an interactive presentation.

Results: A total of 39 nurse leaders completed the presurvey to assess baseline familiarity, understanding, and confidence, and 24 completed the postsurvey after the intervention. Familiarity with the publication process increased from 18% to 67% (p < .001), and understanding improved from 41% to 80% (p = .007). Comfort with team writing also increased, from 59% to 88% (p = .0346). Mentorship and checklists were the most frequently selected support resources.

Conclusion: Targeted educational interventions can empower and inspire nurse leaders to engage in scholarly publishing by enhancing confidence and understanding of the process. Sustained initiatives, such as mentorship and structured resources, are vital for cultivating a culture of nursing scholarship.

促进出版准备护士领导:从试点教育干预的结果。
背景:Magnet®指定的高容量I级创伤教学医院的护士领导展示了在护理实践中推进新知识、创新和改进的承诺。尽管有这些贡献,他们的工作很少通过学术出版物得到认可。方法:采用前测/后测描述性设计进行了一项试点研究,以评估护士领导在交互式演示的教育干预后对学术出版过程的看法和信心。结果:共有39名护士长完成了调查,以评估基线熟悉度、理解度和信心,24名护士长在干预后完成了事后调查。对出版过程的熟悉度从18%提高到67% (p < 0.001),理解度从41%提高到80% (p = 0.007)。团队写作的舒适度也从59%增加到88% (p = .0346)。指导和清单是最常被选择的支持资源。结论:有针对性的教育干预可以通过增强对学术出版过程的信心和理解来授权和激励护士领导从事学术出版。持续的举措,如指导和结构化资源,对于培养护理学术文化至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing is a monthly peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on continuing nursing education that are directed toward continuing education and staff development professionals, nurse administrators, and nurse educators in all health care settings, for over 50 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信