Understanding treatment barriers for Major Depressive Disorder in the Latino community: A qualitative study stratified by language preference.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Linda E Guzman, Kristen M Fite, Hannah E Frank, Ruben G Martinez, Ana J Bridges
{"title":"Understanding treatment barriers for Major Depressive Disorder in the Latino community: A qualitative study stratified by language preference.","authors":"Linda E Guzman, Kristen M Fite, Hannah E Frank, Ruben G Martinez, Ana J Bridges","doi":"10.1177/13634615251359457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This qualitative study explores barriers to accessing treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) among Latino adults in the United States, with a novel focus on how these barriers were described based on participants' preferred language. Fifty Latino individuals (<i>n</i> = 24 primarily Spanish-speaking; <i>n</i> = 26 primarily English-speaking) participated in Zoom interviews and completed a demographic survey and the patient health questionnaire-9 MDD self-report measure in their preferred language. Thematic analysis of interview data identified barriers across three levels: individual (e.g., stigma, service literacy, treatment readiness, caretaking responsibilities), provider (e.g., language barriers, cultural humility, perceived care quality), and clinic (e.g., cost, time constraints, waitlists, geographical access). While many challenges were shared across groups, key differences emerged. Spanish-speaking participants emphasized the importance of bilingual providers and described feelings of mistrust, communication fears, and concerns about emotional safety when language concordance was absent. English-speaking participants described prioritizing working with bicultural providers who demonstrated cultural humility and a nuanced understanding of possible intergenerational and structural stressors. Structural barriers, such as cost and scheduling, were often compounded by emotional experiences such as shame and mistrust, underscoring the need for both system-level and culturally responsive solutions. These findings reinforce the need for equity-informed strategies that attend to the intersection of language, culture, and structural barriers to MDD treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47864,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"13634615251359457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615251359457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative study explores barriers to accessing treatment for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) among Latino adults in the United States, with a novel focus on how these barriers were described based on participants' preferred language. Fifty Latino individuals (n = 24 primarily Spanish-speaking; n = 26 primarily English-speaking) participated in Zoom interviews and completed a demographic survey and the patient health questionnaire-9 MDD self-report measure in their preferred language. Thematic analysis of interview data identified barriers across three levels: individual (e.g., stigma, service literacy, treatment readiness, caretaking responsibilities), provider (e.g., language barriers, cultural humility, perceived care quality), and clinic (e.g., cost, time constraints, waitlists, geographical access). While many challenges were shared across groups, key differences emerged. Spanish-speaking participants emphasized the importance of bilingual providers and described feelings of mistrust, communication fears, and concerns about emotional safety when language concordance was absent. English-speaking participants described prioritizing working with bicultural providers who demonstrated cultural humility and a nuanced understanding of possible intergenerational and structural stressors. Structural barriers, such as cost and scheduling, were often compounded by emotional experiences such as shame and mistrust, underscoring the need for both system-level and culturally responsive solutions. These findings reinforce the need for equity-informed strategies that attend to the intersection of language, culture, and structural barriers to MDD treatment.

了解拉丁裔社区重度抑郁症的治疗障碍:一项以语言偏好分层的定性研究。
本定性研究探讨了美国拉丁裔成年人获得重度抑郁症(MDD)治疗的障碍,并新颖地关注了如何根据参与者的首选语言来描述这些障碍。50名拉丁美洲人(n = 24,主要讲西班牙语;n = 26名(以英语为主)参加了Zoom访谈,并以其首选语言完成了人口统计调查和患者健康问卷-9 MDD自我报告测量。访谈数据的专题分析确定了三个层面的障碍:个人(例如,耻辱,服务素养,治疗准备,护理责任),提供者(例如,语言障碍,文化谦逊,感知护理质量)和诊所(例如,成本,时间限制,等候名单,地理访问)。虽然许多挑战是跨群体共同面临的,但也出现了关键的差异。说西班牙语的参与者强调了双语提供者的重要性,并描述了当语言不一致时的不信任、沟通恐惧和对情感安全的担忧。说英语的参与者描述了优先与双文化提供者合作,他们表现出文化谦逊,并对可能的代际和结构性压力因素有细致的理解。结构性障碍,如成本和进度,往往与情感经验,如羞耻和不信任,强调需要系统级和文化响应的解决方案。这些发现加强了对公平知情策略的需求,这些策略涉及语言、文化和重度抑郁症治疗的结构性障碍的交叉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Transcultural Psychiatry is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on cultural psychiatry and mental health. Cultural psychiatry is concerned with the social and cultural determinants of psychopathology and psychosocial treatments of the range of mental and behavioural problems in individuals, families and human groups. In addition to the clinical research methods of psychiatry, it draws from the disciplines of psychiatric epidemiology, medical anthropology and cross-cultural psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信