User groups of inpatient multidisciplinary therapies for Parkinson's disease in Germany: a bicenter prospective observational study.

IF 3.2 Q2 Medicine
Vera Tschentscher, Judith Oppermann, Julius Welzel, Johanna Geritz, Ralf Gold, Siegfried Muhlack, Clint Hansen, Walter Maetzler, Lars Tönges, Raphael Scherbaum
{"title":"User groups of inpatient multidisciplinary therapies for Parkinson's disease in Germany: a bicenter prospective observational study.","authors":"Vera Tschentscher, Judith Oppermann, Julius Welzel, Johanna Geritz, Ralf Gold, Siegfried Muhlack, Clint Hansen, Walter Maetzler, Lars Tönges, Raphael Scherbaum","doi":"10.1186/s42466-025-00409-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Germany, multidisciplinary care for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP, PD) is mainly provided in the inpatient setting. Differences in user groups between established and effective interventions like PD Multimodal Complex Therapy (PD-MCT) and Geriatric Complex Therapy (GCT) have not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This real-world bicenter prospective observational study involved PwP undergoing 14-day inpatient multidisciplinary therapies at two German university hospitals providing either PD-MCT or GCT. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded before and device-based gait variables before and after therapy. Non-parametric and parametric tests including ANCOVA with age as covariate were conducted to compare groups at baseline, and an exploratory binomial logistic regression (LR) to identify predictors of 'therapy response' concerning gait speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 09/2017 and 09/2022, 100 (41% female) and 102 (34.3% female) PwP received GCT or PD-MCT, with significant (p < 0.003) mean or median differences (GCT vs. PD-MCT) in age (74.7 vs. 65.6 years), disease duration (9.9 vs. 7.4 years), and HY stage (3 vs. 2.5). The GCT group showed significantly reduced lower extremity (SPPB), global cognitive (MoCA) and executive function (TMT), lower quality of life, and higher fear of falling (FES-I). There were significant (p < 0.004) between-group differences in gait parameters at both normal and fast pace, e.g., reduced gait speed and step length among GCT users. After age-adjustment, differences in gait speed, fast-pace step length, lower extremity and executive function, fear of falling and quality of life persisted. The exploratory LR model was statistically significant (p < 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.312) and revealed lower fear of falling and gait speed as predictors of 'therapy response', independent of therapy type, age, sex, disease duration or stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GCT users show higher age and severity, particularly concerning mobility impairments independent of age. It is unclear if, on a national level, actual PD-MCT/GCT user groups align with intended target groups. Health insurance data analyses could help refine clinical recommendations and public health policies for more targeted multidisciplinary PD care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Park Move Study: DRKS, DRKS00020948. Registered 30 March 2020-retrospectively registered, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020948/details.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00409-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Germany, multidisciplinary care for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP, PD) is mainly provided in the inpatient setting. Differences in user groups between established and effective interventions like PD Multimodal Complex Therapy (PD-MCT) and Geriatric Complex Therapy (GCT) have not been investigated.

Methods: This real-world bicenter prospective observational study involved PwP undergoing 14-day inpatient multidisciplinary therapies at two German university hospitals providing either PD-MCT or GCT. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded before and device-based gait variables before and after therapy. Non-parametric and parametric tests including ANCOVA with age as covariate were conducted to compare groups at baseline, and an exploratory binomial logistic regression (LR) to identify predictors of 'therapy response' concerning gait speed.

Results: Between 09/2017 and 09/2022, 100 (41% female) and 102 (34.3% female) PwP received GCT or PD-MCT, with significant (p < 0.003) mean or median differences (GCT vs. PD-MCT) in age (74.7 vs. 65.6 years), disease duration (9.9 vs. 7.4 years), and HY stage (3 vs. 2.5). The GCT group showed significantly reduced lower extremity (SPPB), global cognitive (MoCA) and executive function (TMT), lower quality of life, and higher fear of falling (FES-I). There were significant (p < 0.004) between-group differences in gait parameters at both normal and fast pace, e.g., reduced gait speed and step length among GCT users. After age-adjustment, differences in gait speed, fast-pace step length, lower extremity and executive function, fear of falling and quality of life persisted. The exploratory LR model was statistically significant (p < 0.05, R2 = 0.312) and revealed lower fear of falling and gait speed as predictors of 'therapy response', independent of therapy type, age, sex, disease duration or stage.

Conclusion: GCT users show higher age and severity, particularly concerning mobility impairments independent of age. It is unclear if, on a national level, actual PD-MCT/GCT user groups align with intended target groups. Health insurance data analyses could help refine clinical recommendations and public health policies for more targeted multidisciplinary PD care.

Trial registration: Park Move Study: DRKS, DRKS00020948. Registered 30 March 2020-retrospectively registered, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020948/details.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

德国帕金森病住院多学科治疗的用户群体:一项双中心前瞻性观察研究
背景:在德国,帕金森病(PwP, PD)患者的多学科护理主要在住院环境中提供。已建立的和有效的干预措施,如PD多模态复合治疗(PD- mct)和老年复合治疗(GCT)之间的用户群体差异尚未调查。方法:这项现实世界的双中心前瞻性观察研究涉及在两所德国大学医院接受14天住院多学科治疗的PwP,提供PD-MCT或GCT。在治疗前后记录人口学和临床变量以及基于器械的步态变量。采用以年龄为协变量的ANCOVA进行非参数检验和参数检验,比较各组基线水平,并采用探索性二项逻辑回归(LR)来确定与步态速度有关的“治疗反应”预测因素。结果:在2017年9月至2022年9月期间,100名PwP(41%为女性)和102名PwP(34.3%为女性)接受了GCT或PD-MCT,显著(p 2 = 0.312),并且显示较低的跌倒恐惧和步态速度是“治疗反应”的预测因子,与治疗类型、年龄、性别、疾病持续时间或分期无关。结论:GCT使用者表现出更高的年龄和严重程度,特别是与年龄无关的行动障碍。目前尚不清楚,在国家层面上,PD-MCT/GCT的实际用户群体是否与预期目标群体一致。健康保险数据分析可以帮助完善临床建议和公共卫生政策,更有针对性的多学科PD护理。试验注册:Park Move研究:DRKS, DRKS00020948。注册于2020年3月30日-追溯注册,https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00020948/details。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信