Correction to "Loneliness predicts self-reported cold symptoms after a viral challenge" by LeRoy et al. (2017).

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
{"title":"Correction to \"Loneliness predicts self-reported cold symptoms after a viral challenge\" by LeRoy et al. (2017).","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/hea0001558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reports an error in \"Loneliness predicts self-reported cold symptoms after a viral challenge\" by Angie S. LeRoy, Kyle W. Murdock, Lisa M. Jaremka, Asad Loya and Christopher P. Fagundes (<i>Health Psychology</i>, 2017[May], Vol 36[5], 512-520; see record 2017-14291-001). In the article, the authors identified more than one categorical variable (i.e., sex, cold season, marital status) in Table 2 (i.e., zeroorder correlations). As a result, the estimate between these categorical variables was not correct because it would require a chi-square analysis, rather than a correlation. The authors corrected the estimates listed in Table 2 and removed \"cold season\" and \"marital status\" from the variable column of the table. Further, the authors conducted the more appropriate chi-square test among each of the three possible categorical variable pairs (i.e., sex and marital status, sex and cold season, and marital status and cold season) and have added this information to the Table 2 note. The authors also recoded the marital status variable in a more meaningful way. Instead, the marital status variable is now coded as 0 = unmarried, 1 = married. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2017-14291-001). [Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 37(7) of <i>Health Psychology</i> (see record 2018-28422-002). The erratum reports the following acknowledgments that were partially omitted from the author note: Data used in this article were collected by the Laboratory for the Study of Stress, Immunity, and Disease. The data were accessed via the Common Cold Project website. Additional grants that supported the collection of these data and clinical and regulatory assistance. The full correction is listed in the erratum.] Objective: Loneliness is a well-established risk factor for poor physical health. Much less is known about how loneliness affects patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as somatic symptoms, which are increasingly important for guiding symptom management and assessing quality of patient care. The current study investigates whether (a) loneliness and social isolation predict cold symptoms independent of each other, and (b) whether loneliness is a more robust risk factor than objective social isolation for experiencing cold symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>As part of a larger parent study, 213 healthy participants completed the Short Loneliness Scale (LON) and the Social Network Index (SNI) at baseline. They were given nasal drops containing rhinovirus 39 (RV39; i.e., a common cold virus), then quarantined for 5 days during which they reported on subjective cold symptoms in addition to being monitored for objective indicators of infection. Data from 160 of the participants (who were infected with the virus) were used in the present analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A hierarchical multiple regression revealed that baseline loneliness predicted self-reported cold symptoms over time (assessed via area under the curve), over and above demographic variables, season of participation, and depressive affect. Interestingly, social network size and diversity did not predict cold symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that the perception of loneliness is more closely linked to self-reported illness symptoms than objectively measured social isolation. Assessing psychosocial factors such as loneliness when treating and evaluating the common cold could contribute to health care practitioners' understanding of their patients' experiences with acute illness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001558","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reports an error in "Loneliness predicts self-reported cold symptoms after a viral challenge" by Angie S. LeRoy, Kyle W. Murdock, Lisa M. Jaremka, Asad Loya and Christopher P. Fagundes (Health Psychology, 2017[May], Vol 36[5], 512-520; see record 2017-14291-001). In the article, the authors identified more than one categorical variable (i.e., sex, cold season, marital status) in Table 2 (i.e., zeroorder correlations). As a result, the estimate between these categorical variables was not correct because it would require a chi-square analysis, rather than a correlation. The authors corrected the estimates listed in Table 2 and removed "cold season" and "marital status" from the variable column of the table. Further, the authors conducted the more appropriate chi-square test among each of the three possible categorical variable pairs (i.e., sex and marital status, sex and cold season, and marital status and cold season) and have added this information to the Table 2 note. The authors also recoded the marital status variable in a more meaningful way. Instead, the marital status variable is now coded as 0 = unmarried, 1 = married. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2017-14291-001). [Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 37(7) of Health Psychology (see record 2018-28422-002). The erratum reports the following acknowledgments that were partially omitted from the author note: Data used in this article were collected by the Laboratory for the Study of Stress, Immunity, and Disease. The data were accessed via the Common Cold Project website. Additional grants that supported the collection of these data and clinical and regulatory assistance. The full correction is listed in the erratum.] Objective: Loneliness is a well-established risk factor for poor physical health. Much less is known about how loneliness affects patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as somatic symptoms, which are increasingly important for guiding symptom management and assessing quality of patient care. The current study investigates whether (a) loneliness and social isolation predict cold symptoms independent of each other, and (b) whether loneliness is a more robust risk factor than objective social isolation for experiencing cold symptoms.

Method: As part of a larger parent study, 213 healthy participants completed the Short Loneliness Scale (LON) and the Social Network Index (SNI) at baseline. They were given nasal drops containing rhinovirus 39 (RV39; i.e., a common cold virus), then quarantined for 5 days during which they reported on subjective cold symptoms in addition to being monitored for objective indicators of infection. Data from 160 of the participants (who were infected with the virus) were used in the present analyses.

Results: A hierarchical multiple regression revealed that baseline loneliness predicted self-reported cold symptoms over time (assessed via area under the curve), over and above demographic variables, season of participation, and depressive affect. Interestingly, social network size and diversity did not predict cold symptoms.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the perception of loneliness is more closely linked to self-reported illness symptoms than objectively measured social isolation. Assessing psychosocial factors such as loneliness when treating and evaluating the common cold could contribute to health care practitioners' understanding of their patients' experiences with acute illness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

LeRoy等人(2017)对“孤独预测病毒感染后自我报告的感冒症状”的更正。
Angie S. LeRoy, Kyle W. Murdock, Lisa M. Jaremka, Asad Loya和Christopher P. Fagundes在“孤独预测病毒挑战后自我报告的感冒症状”报告中的错误(健康心理学,2017[5],Vol 36 b[5], 512-520;见记录2017-14291-001)。在文章中,作者在表2中确定了多个分类变量(即性别,寒冷季节,婚姻状况)(即零级相关性)。结果,这些分类变量之间的估计是不正确的,因为它需要卡方分析,而不是相关性。作者更正了表2中所列的估计值,并从表的变量栏中删除了“寒冷季节”和“婚姻状况”。此外,作者对三个可能的分类变量对(即性别与婚姻状况、性别与寒冷季节、婚姻状况与寒冷季节)分别进行了更合适的卡方检验,并将这些信息添加到表2注释中。作者还以一种更有意义的方式重新记录了婚姻状况变量。相反,婚姻状况变量现在被编码为0 =未婚,1 =已婚。本文的在线版本已被更正。(原文摘要见记录2017-14291-001)[更正通知:本文的勘误报告于《健康心理学》第37(7)卷(见记录2018-28422-002)。]该勘误报告了以下在作者注释中被部分省略的致谢:本文中使用的数据由压力、免疫和疾病研究实验室收集。这些数据是通过普通感冒项目网站获取的。支持收集这些数据以及临床和监管援助的额外拨款。完整的更正列在勘误表中。目的:孤独是身体健康状况不佳的一个公认的危险因素。人们对孤独如何影响患者报告的结果(PROs)知之甚少,例如躯体症状,这对于指导症状管理和评估患者护理质量越来越重要。目前的研究调查了(a)孤独和社会隔离是否相互独立地预测感冒症状,以及(b)孤独是否比客观的社会隔离更能导致感冒症状。方法:作为一项更大的父母研究的一部分,213名健康的参与者完成了短期孤独量表(LON)和社会网络指数(SNI)的基线。他们被给予含有鼻病毒39 (RV39)的滴鼻液;即一种普通感冒病毒),然后隔离5天,在此期间,除了监测感染的客观指标外,他们还报告了主观感冒症状。来自160名参与者(他们感染了病毒)的数据被用于本分析。结果:分层多元回归显示,基线孤独感预测了自我报告的感冒症状随时间的变化(通过曲线下面积评估),超过了人口统计学变量、参与季节和抑郁影响。有趣的是,社会网络的规模和多样性并不能预测感冒症状。结论:这些发现表明,与客观测量的社会隔离相比,孤独感与自我报告的疾病症状联系更紧密。在治疗和评估普通感冒时,评估孤独感等社会心理因素有助于卫生保健从业人员了解患者患急性疾病的经历。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信