Measurement of functional status in primary care: the role of the interprofessional team.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kara A Zamora-Rogoski, Rebecca T Brown, Anael Rizzo, Francesca M Nicosia
{"title":"Measurement of functional status in primary care: the role of the interprofessional team.","authors":"Kara A Zamora-Rogoski, Rebecca T Brown, Anael Rizzo, Francesca M Nicosia","doi":"10.1080/13561820.2025.2537124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measuring functional status allows clinicians to deliver evidence-based interventions to prevent or delay associated adverse outcomes. Functional status is seldom routinely measured in primary care settings where most older adults receive care. Interprofessional team-based care is increasingly regarded as an important feature of high quality and efficient health care systems. Yet despite growing evidence of the benefits of team-based care, in primary care there are not yet standards for how to operationalize interprofessional practice. In this study we explored interprofessional perspectives on assessing functional status among older adults in team-based VA primary care clinics. We conducted qualitative interviews with 57 primary care team members (nursing staff, primary care providers, and social workers) from six geographically diverse VA medical centers. We drew from implementation science frameworks and sociotechnical theories to ground our thematic analysis in dynamic, real-world contexts. Interviews revealed the view that all primary care team members play a role in measuring and addressing functional status. Participants also described a perceived hierarchy of accuracy of assessment based on role and outlined strategies for validating the accuracy of functional status assessments. These results can inform guidelines for functional status measurement in primary care that improve interprofessional assessment and team-based communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2537124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring functional status allows clinicians to deliver evidence-based interventions to prevent or delay associated adverse outcomes. Functional status is seldom routinely measured in primary care settings where most older adults receive care. Interprofessional team-based care is increasingly regarded as an important feature of high quality and efficient health care systems. Yet despite growing evidence of the benefits of team-based care, in primary care there are not yet standards for how to operationalize interprofessional practice. In this study we explored interprofessional perspectives on assessing functional status among older adults in team-based VA primary care clinics. We conducted qualitative interviews with 57 primary care team members (nursing staff, primary care providers, and social workers) from six geographically diverse VA medical centers. We drew from implementation science frameworks and sociotechnical theories to ground our thematic analysis in dynamic, real-world contexts. Interviews revealed the view that all primary care team members play a role in measuring and addressing functional status. Participants also described a perceived hierarchy of accuracy of assessment based on role and outlined strategies for validating the accuracy of functional status assessments. These results can inform guidelines for functional status measurement in primary care that improve interprofessional assessment and team-based communication.

初级保健中功能状态的测量:跨专业团队的作用。
测量功能状态使临床医生能够提供基于证据的干预措施,以预防或延迟相关的不良后果。在大多数老年人接受护理的初级保健机构中,很少常规测量功能状态。以团队为基础的跨专业护理日益被视为高质量和高效医疗保健系统的重要特征。然而,尽管越来越多的证据表明以团队为基础的护理有好处,但在初级保健中,如何实施跨专业实践还没有标准。在这项研究中,我们探讨了跨专业的观点来评估老年人在团队为基础的VA初级保健诊所的功能状态。我们对来自六个地理位置不同的退伍军人事务部医疗中心的57名初级保健团队成员(护理人员、初级保健提供者和社会工作者)进行了定性访谈。我们借鉴了实施科学框架和社会技术理论,将我们的主题分析建立在动态的、现实世界的背景下。访谈显示,所有初级保健团队成员都在测量和解决功能状态方面发挥作用。参与者还描述了基于角色的评估准确性的感知层次,并概述了验证功能状态评估准确性的策略。这些结果可以为初级保健的功能状态测量提供指导,从而改善专业间评估和团队沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Journal of Interprofessional Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interprofessional Care disseminates research and new developments in the field of interprofessional education and practice. We welcome contributions containing an explicit interprofessional focus, and involving a range of settings, professions, and fields. Areas of practice covered include primary, community and hospital care, health education and public health, and beyond health and social care into fields such as criminal justice and primary/elementary education. Papers introducing additional interprofessional views, for example, from a community development or environmental design perspective, are welcome. The Journal is disseminated internationally and encourages submissions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信