Examining visual prior entry of semantic affective valences: positive is biased over negative.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Sihan He, Jay Pratt
{"title":"Examining visual prior entry of semantic affective valences: positive is biased over negative.","authors":"Sihan He, Jay Pratt","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2539214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Affective valences of stimuli (e.g. positive or negative) influence perceptual prioritisation, with emotionally charged stimuli often attended to over neutral ones. However, there are two critical issues in interpreting the previous findings on affective biases: (1) reliance on Reaction Time (RT) measures, which have limitations in capturing subtle cognitive biases at different phases of visual processing, and (2) potential confounds from low-level visual features that can carry affective valence. To address these issues, we used a Temporal Order Judgement (TOJ) paradigm with semantic stimuli and Chinese characters due to their minimised perceptual variations. In this task, two stimuli were presented nearly simultaneously, and participants indicated which appeared first. If an engagement bias is present, participants would consistently perceive the biased stimulus as first appearing even when it was veridically the second (Prior Entry Effect). We specifically examined the direct competition between positive and negative valences at the semantic level. Our results revealed a consistent positive bias over negative stimuli, although its magnitude was smaller than biases observed with facial stimuli in prior research. These findings suggest that affective biases might occur at both semantic and visual levels, offering a more nuanced understanding of emotional attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2539214","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Affective valences of stimuli (e.g. positive or negative) influence perceptual prioritisation, with emotionally charged stimuli often attended to over neutral ones. However, there are two critical issues in interpreting the previous findings on affective biases: (1) reliance on Reaction Time (RT) measures, which have limitations in capturing subtle cognitive biases at different phases of visual processing, and (2) potential confounds from low-level visual features that can carry affective valence. To address these issues, we used a Temporal Order Judgement (TOJ) paradigm with semantic stimuli and Chinese characters due to their minimised perceptual variations. In this task, two stimuli were presented nearly simultaneously, and participants indicated which appeared first. If an engagement bias is present, participants would consistently perceive the biased stimulus as first appearing even when it was veridically the second (Prior Entry Effect). We specifically examined the direct competition between positive and negative valences at the semantic level. Our results revealed a consistent positive bias over negative stimuli, although its magnitude was smaller than biases observed with facial stimuli in prior research. These findings suggest that affective biases might occur at both semantic and visual levels, offering a more nuanced understanding of emotional attention.

检查语义情感效价的视觉先验输入:积极是偏向于消极的。
刺激的情感效价(例如,积极或消极)影响感知优先级,带有情绪的刺激通常会超过中性的刺激。然而,在解释先前关于情感偏差的研究结果时,存在两个关键问题:(1)依赖于反应时间(RT)测量,这在捕捉视觉加工的不同阶段的细微认知偏差方面存在局限性;(2)可能携带情感效价的低水平视觉特征的潜在混淆。为了解决这些问题,我们使用了语义刺激和汉字的时间顺序判断(TOJ)范式,因为它们的感知变化最小。在这项任务中,两种刺激几乎同时出现,参与者指出哪一个先出现。如果参与偏差存在,参与者会始终认为有偏见的刺激是第一个出现的,即使它实际上是第二个(先验进入效应)。我们特别研究了语义层面上正负价之间的直接竞争。我们的研究结果显示,尽管其程度小于先前研究中观察到的面部刺激的偏差,但积极的偏倚始终高于消极的刺激。这些发现表明,情感偏差可能发生在语义和视觉层面,从而对情感关注提供了更细致的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信