Does parental racial socialization protect Black youth from the impact of racism on problematic substance use over the long term?

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Charlene Kuo, Lydia HaRim Ahn, Munjireen Sifat, Kerry M Green
{"title":"Does parental racial socialization protect Black youth from the impact of racism on problematic substance use over the long term?","authors":"Charlene Kuo, Lydia HaRim Ahn, Munjireen Sifat, Kerry M Green","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Parental racial socialization refers to the messages children receive about race from their parents. Little is known about parental racial socialization's long-term impact on problematic substance use or whether it can protect against adversities commonly experienced by Black Americans. We examined whether parental racial socialization reduces the risk of problematic substance use and buffers the impact of neighborhood disadvantage and racial discrimination on problematic substance use, with attention to the types of messaging.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data are from a sample (<i>n</i> = 825) of the Woodlawn Study, a community cohort study that followed Black Americans from Chicago from first grade into midlife (55.3% female), with data collected at ages 6, 16, 32, and 42. Adjusted regression models were run with multiple imputation accounting for missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After controlling for covariates, we found parental racial socialization messages about racial barriers were associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for problematic substance use in midlife (adjusted odds ratio = 0.45, 95% CI [0.22, 0.93]). While racial discrimination and neighborhood disadvantage were statistically significant predictors of problematic substance use in unadjusted models, neither was statistically significant in adjusted models. Neither the interaction term between parental racial socialization and personally mediated racism nor the interaction term between parental racial socialization and neighborhood disadvantage was statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests the promise of parental racial socialization messages about racial barriers to prevent and reduce the risk of problematic substance use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Parental racial socialization refers to the messages children receive about race from their parents. Little is known about parental racial socialization's long-term impact on problematic substance use or whether it can protect against adversities commonly experienced by Black Americans. We examined whether parental racial socialization reduces the risk of problematic substance use and buffers the impact of neighborhood disadvantage and racial discrimination on problematic substance use, with attention to the types of messaging.

Method: Data are from a sample (n = 825) of the Woodlawn Study, a community cohort study that followed Black Americans from Chicago from first grade into midlife (55.3% female), with data collected at ages 6, 16, 32, and 42. Adjusted regression models were run with multiple imputation accounting for missing data.

Results: After controlling for covariates, we found parental racial socialization messages about racial barriers were associated with a lower likelihood of meeting criteria for problematic substance use in midlife (adjusted odds ratio = 0.45, 95% CI [0.22, 0.93]). While racial discrimination and neighborhood disadvantage were statistically significant predictors of problematic substance use in unadjusted models, neither was statistically significant in adjusted models. Neither the interaction term between parental racial socialization and personally mediated racism nor the interaction term between parental racial socialization and neighborhood disadvantage was statistically significant.

Conclusions: Our study suggests the promise of parental racial socialization messages about racial barriers to prevent and reduce the risk of problematic substance use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

父母的种族社会化是否能长期保护黑人青年免受种族主义对问题物质使用的影响?
目的:父母种族社会化是指儿童从父母那里接收到的关于种族的信息。关于父母种族社会化对问题物质使用的长期影响,或者它是否能保护美国黑人免受通常经历的逆境,人们知之甚少。我们研究了父母种族社会化是否降低了问题物质使用的风险,并缓冲了社区劣势和种族歧视对问题物质使用的影响,并注意了信息的类型。方法:数据来自Woodlawn研究的样本(n = 825), Woodlawn研究是一项社区队列研究,追踪芝加哥黑人从一年级到中年(55.3%为女性),数据收集于6岁、16岁、32岁和42岁。调整后的回归模型使用多重输入计算缺失数据。结果:在控制了协变量后,我们发现父母关于种族障碍的种族社会化信息与中年人符合问题物质使用标准的可能性较低相关(调整优势比= 0.45,95% CI[0.22, 0.93])。在未调整的模型中,种族歧视和社区劣势在统计上是问题物质使用的显著预测因素,但在调整的模型中,这两者在统计上都不显著。父母种族社会化与个人介导的种族主义之间的交互项和父母种族社会化与邻里劣势之间的交互项均无统计学意义。结论:我们的研究表明,父母关于种族障碍的种族社会化信息有望预防和减少问题物质使用的风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信