Evaluating the effectiveness of household food waste interventions through scenario-based fuzzy cognitive map methodology: A new tool and guide to food policy-research

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Ahmet Ekici , Tugce Ozgen Genc , Şule Önsel Ekici
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of household food waste interventions through scenario-based fuzzy cognitive map methodology: A new tool and guide to food policy-research","authors":"Ahmet Ekici ,&nbsp;Tugce Ozgen Genc ,&nbsp;Şule Önsel Ekici","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Reducing household food waste (HHFW), one of the major contributors to total food waste, is a critical responsibility shared by food researchers and policymakers. To date, researchers have examined the drivers of HHFW and proposed various recommendations to mitigate it. Although the growing body of literature on HHFW interventions has generated valuable insights, several limitations—such as methodological inconsistencies, narrow scope, missing variables, concerns over reliability, and limited research designs—complicate meaningful comparisons and hinder the aggregation of findings across studies. Moreover, while numerous intervention strategies have been proposed and implemented, their effectiveness often remains underexplored or is assessed within the constraints of these limitations. The Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) methodology presents a unique opportunity for food policy researchers to investigate the effectiveness of food waste prevention activities and interventions. We argue that FCM holds this potential because it offers a consistent analytical foundation, supported by theoretical frameworks and prior findings, through which diverse intervention alternatives can be tested and compared. Accordingly, following the construction of a fuzzy cognitive map of HHFW—based on a comprehensive review of the literature and expert assessment—this paper aims to utilize the FCM to determine and compare the HHFW-reduction capacity of various real-world intervention alternatives. Our findings highlight the strong potential of specific emerging retail formats (e.g., zero-packaging grocery stores) and manufacturing technologies (e.g., intelligent fridges) to reduce HHFW, although both require careful implementation to achieve their intended impact. Commonly employed interventions, such as informational campaigns, may prove ineffective when used in isolation and should therefore be complemented by other types of interventions. Online shopping—an increasingly prevalent food purchasing behavior—can substantially contribute to HHFW, underscoring the need for practitioners to consider the potential negative consequences of algorithm-driven purchasing systems. We provide an in-depth discussion of these findings, examine the study’s limitations, and elaborate on their implications for consumers, producers, distributors, and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 102927"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reducing household food waste (HHFW), one of the major contributors to total food waste, is a critical responsibility shared by food researchers and policymakers. To date, researchers have examined the drivers of HHFW and proposed various recommendations to mitigate it. Although the growing body of literature on HHFW interventions has generated valuable insights, several limitations—such as methodological inconsistencies, narrow scope, missing variables, concerns over reliability, and limited research designs—complicate meaningful comparisons and hinder the aggregation of findings across studies. Moreover, while numerous intervention strategies have been proposed and implemented, their effectiveness often remains underexplored or is assessed within the constraints of these limitations. The Fuzzy Cognitive Map (FCM) methodology presents a unique opportunity for food policy researchers to investigate the effectiveness of food waste prevention activities and interventions. We argue that FCM holds this potential because it offers a consistent analytical foundation, supported by theoretical frameworks and prior findings, through which diverse intervention alternatives can be tested and compared. Accordingly, following the construction of a fuzzy cognitive map of HHFW—based on a comprehensive review of the literature and expert assessment—this paper aims to utilize the FCM to determine and compare the HHFW-reduction capacity of various real-world intervention alternatives. Our findings highlight the strong potential of specific emerging retail formats (e.g., zero-packaging grocery stores) and manufacturing technologies (e.g., intelligent fridges) to reduce HHFW, although both require careful implementation to achieve their intended impact. Commonly employed interventions, such as informational campaigns, may prove ineffective when used in isolation and should therefore be complemented by other types of interventions. Online shopping—an increasingly prevalent food purchasing behavior—can substantially contribute to HHFW, underscoring the need for practitioners to consider the potential negative consequences of algorithm-driven purchasing systems. We provide an in-depth discussion of these findings, examine the study’s limitations, and elaborate on their implications for consumers, producers, distributors, and policymakers.
基于场景的模糊认知地图方法评估家庭食物浪费干预措施的有效性:粮食政策研究的新工具和指南
减少家庭食物浪费(HHFW)是食物浪费总量的主要来源之一,是食品研究人员和政策制定者共同的重要责任。迄今为止,研究人员已经研究了HHFW的驱动因素,并提出了各种缓解建议。尽管越来越多的关于HHFW干预的文献产生了有价值的见解,但一些局限性——如方法不一致、范围狭窄、缺少变量、对可靠性的担忧和有限的研究设计——使有意义的比较复杂化,并阻碍了研究结果的汇总。此外,虽然已经提出和实施了许多干预策略,但它们的有效性往往仍未得到充分探索或在这些限制的限制下进行评估。模糊认知图(FCM)方法为食品政策研究人员提供了一个独特的机会来调查食物浪费预防活动和干预措施的有效性。我们认为FCM具有这种潜力,因为它提供了一个一致的分析基础,由理论框架和先前的研究结果支持,通过它可以测试和比较不同的干预方案。因此,在综合文献回顾和专家评估的基础上,构建了一个hhfw的模糊认知图,本文旨在利用FCM来确定和比较各种现实世界干预方案的hhfw减少能力。我们的研究结果强调了特定的新兴零售业态(例如,零包装杂货店)和制造技术(例如,智能冰箱)在减少HHFW方面的巨大潜力,尽管两者都需要仔细实施才能实现预期的影响。通常采用的干预措施,如宣传运动,如果单独使用可能是无效的,因此应辅以其他类型的干预措施。网上购物——一种日益流行的食品购买行为——可以极大地促进HHFW,强调从业者需要考虑算法驱动的购买系统的潜在负面影响。我们对这些发现进行了深入的讨论,考察了研究的局限性,并详细阐述了它们对消费者、生产商、分销商和政策制定者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信