Scott Ferguson, Coral Hahn-Townsend, Benoit Mouzon, Salina Yathiraj, Giovanni Brunetti, Nicole Saltiel, Cillian E. Lynch, Michael Mullan, Fiona Crawford
{"title":"Neural network classification of Barnes maze search strategy utilization","authors":"Scott Ferguson, Coral Hahn-Townsend, Benoit Mouzon, Salina Yathiraj, Giovanni Brunetti, Nicole Saltiel, Cillian E. Lynch, Michael Mullan, Fiona Crawford","doi":"10.1016/j.brainresbull.2025.111483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9302,"journal":{"name":"Brain Research Bulletin","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 111483"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Research Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361923025002953","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Barnes maze is a commonly used test of allocentric spatial reference memory, consisting of an elevated circular table with holes around the perimeter. Spatial cues surrounding the maze are intended to allow the animal on the maze to locate a target hole from which they can escape and return to their home cage during a period of acquisition trials. Following the acquisition period, the target box under the target hole is removed and a probe trial is performed to test spatial memory. One of the limitations of Barnes maze testing is that non-spatial strategies can be employed to locate the target hole, such as systematic serial searching hole to hole, which may mask the signal of spatial learning or memory deficits on gross outcome measures, such as the latency to find the target hole. Quantifying the search strategies used during Barnes maze testing can provide a more direct measurement of spatial memory impairments, and even allow for the detection of impairments to executive functioning and working memory that may impact the ability to utilize non-spatial systematic search strategies. We have developed a machine learning algorithm to automatically quantify search strategy utilization in an unbiased manner. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to cause impairments in spatial learning and memory, and in our testing with a model of repetitive mild TBI we have found significant deficits in the utilization of both spatial and systematic non-spatial search strategies 3 months after TBI. Understanding the factors driving gross outcome measures on the Barnes maze may provide greater insight into the effectiveness of potential treatment strategies designed to mitigate the chronic effects of TBI and other neurodegenerative diseases.
期刊介绍:
The Brain Research Bulletin (BRB) aims to publish novel work that advances our knowledge of molecular and cellular mechanisms that underlie neural network properties associated with behavior, cognition and other brain functions during neurodevelopment and in the adult. Although clinical research is out of the Journal''s scope, the BRB also aims to publish translation research that provides insight into biological mechanisms and processes associated with neurodegeneration mechanisms, neurological diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders. The Journal is especially interested in research using novel methodologies, such as optogenetics, multielectrode array recordings and life imaging in wild-type and genetically-modified animal models, with the goal to advance our understanding of how neurons, glia and networks function in vivo.