Who Stays in Rural Areas? Understanding Gender Differences in Location Decisions Among Millennials in the United States

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Zuzana Bednarik, İlkay Unay-Gailhard
{"title":"Who Stays in Rural Areas? Understanding Gender Differences in Location Decisions Among Millennials in the United States","authors":"Zuzana Bednarik,&nbsp;İlkay Unay-Gailhard","doi":"10.1002/psp.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the factors associated with millennials' past, current and future rural staying, and compares rural with urban stayers, with a particular focus on gender differences. It examines residential choices through three attributes of the millennial generation: proficiency in using digital tools, a strong inclination toward environmental issues, and a desire for work-life balance. Using data from the North Central Region of the United States (NCR-Stat: Baseline Survey 2022), the study employed logistic regression and independent <i>t</i>-tests for data analysis. The findings reveal that the importance of internet availability plays a shifting role in rural staying behaviour throughout millennials' life stages. Millennials who grew up in rural areas tend to place less importance on internet availability than their urban counterparts, but for those planning to remain in rural areas, a reliable internet connection becomes significantly more valuable. Prioritizing outdoor spaces is positively associated with current rural residency, while a preference for low pollution levels is linked to a higher likelihood of residing in urban areas. Higher life satisfaction is significantly associated with both past and current rural living, though rural women report lower satisfaction than men. The gender-specific analysis also indicates that millennial women place significantly more importance on internet availability, low pollution levels, and outdoor spaces than men. These findings extend existing knowledge of past, current and future staying behaviour in rural areas by focusing on a specific group of stayers and highlighting the complexity of staying behaviour and its implications for rural development.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70076","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the factors associated with millennials' past, current and future rural staying, and compares rural with urban stayers, with a particular focus on gender differences. It examines residential choices through three attributes of the millennial generation: proficiency in using digital tools, a strong inclination toward environmental issues, and a desire for work-life balance. Using data from the North Central Region of the United States (NCR-Stat: Baseline Survey 2022), the study employed logistic regression and independent t-tests for data analysis. The findings reveal that the importance of internet availability plays a shifting role in rural staying behaviour throughout millennials' life stages. Millennials who grew up in rural areas tend to place less importance on internet availability than their urban counterparts, but for those planning to remain in rural areas, a reliable internet connection becomes significantly more valuable. Prioritizing outdoor spaces is positively associated with current rural residency, while a preference for low pollution levels is linked to a higher likelihood of residing in urban areas. Higher life satisfaction is significantly associated with both past and current rural living, though rural women report lower satisfaction than men. The gender-specific analysis also indicates that millennial women place significantly more importance on internet availability, low pollution levels, and outdoor spaces than men. These findings extend existing knowledge of past, current and future staying behaviour in rural areas by focusing on a specific group of stayers and highlighting the complexity of staying behaviour and its implications for rural development.

Abstract Image

谁留在农村地区?了解美国千禧一代在选址决策中的性别差异
本研究调查了千禧一代过去、现在和未来在农村居住的相关因素,并比较了农村和城市居民,特别关注性别差异。它通过千禧一代的三个属性来考察住宅选择:熟练使用数字工具,对环境问题的强烈倾向,以及对工作与生活平衡的渴望。本研究使用来自美国中北部地区的数据(NCR-Stat: Baseline Survey 2022),采用logistic回归和独立t检验进行数据分析。研究结果显示,在千禧一代的整个生命阶段,互联网可用性的重要性在农村住宿行为中发挥着不断变化的作用。在农村地区长大的千禧一代往往不像城市同龄人那样重视互联网的可用性,但对于那些计划留在农村地区的人来说,可靠的互联网连接变得更加有价值。优先考虑户外空间与目前居住在农村呈正相关,而对低污染水平的偏好与更有可能居住在城市地区有关。较高的生活满意度与过去和现在的农村生活显著相关,尽管农村妇女报告的满意度低于男性。性别分析还表明,千禧一代女性比男性更重视互联网可用性、低污染水平和户外空间。这些发现通过关注特定的住宿群体,并强调住宿行为的复杂性及其对农村发展的影响,扩展了对农村地区过去、现在和未来住宿行为的现有知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信