Marilena M. DeMayo , Mary Botros , Tiffany K. Bell , Mark Mikkelsen , Victoria Mosher , Antis George , Alexander McGirr , Paolo Federico , Ashley D. Harris
{"title":"Reproducibility of HERMES-measured GABA+ and glutathione in the mesial temporal lobe","authors":"Marilena M. DeMayo , Mary Botros , Tiffany K. Bell , Mark Mikkelsen , Victoria Mosher , Antis George , Alexander McGirr , Paolo Federico , Ashley D. Harris","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is growing interest in using Hadamard Encoding and Reconstruction for MEGA-Edited Spectroscopy (HERMES) within the mesial temporal lobe (MTL). For cross-sectional group comparisons and longitudinal repeated measures designs, an understanding of the internal and test-retest validity of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA+) and glutathione (GSH) is critical. We therefore evaluated the reproducibility of the consensus recommended semi-localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) localization for edited-MRS acquisitions in a challenging region, the MTL.</div></div><div><h3>New method</h3><div>Data were acquired in 15 participants. Single voxel HERMES was collected in the left MTL (two acquisitions) and the right MTL (one acquisition). Participants were repositioned between the two left HERMES acquisitions. An ANOVA was used to assess differences between acquisitions. To assess measurement variation in the repeated left of GABA+ and GSH measures within the left MTL difference values and coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were no significant differences in metabolite values between any of the acquisitions. The mean difference between the metabolite measures from the repeated left acquisitions centred close to zero, and the average CVs were 14.09 % for GABA+ and 18.94 % for GSH.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods</h3><div>The CVs of GABA+ and GSH in the MTL obtained from a HERMES acquisition were comparable to GABA+ or GSH-edited acquisitions in this region, and to data from cortical voxels using HERMES acquisitions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This supports the use of HERMES in the MTL, a challenging region for MRS. However, larger samples and caution in interpretation may be required in repeated-measures designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"423 ","pages":"Article 110542"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025001864","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is growing interest in using Hadamard Encoding and Reconstruction for MEGA-Edited Spectroscopy (HERMES) within the mesial temporal lobe (MTL). For cross-sectional group comparisons and longitudinal repeated measures designs, an understanding of the internal and test-retest validity of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA+) and glutathione (GSH) is critical. We therefore evaluated the reproducibility of the consensus recommended semi-localization by adiabatic selective refocusing (sLASER) localization for edited-MRS acquisitions in a challenging region, the MTL.
New method
Data were acquired in 15 participants. Single voxel HERMES was collected in the left MTL (two acquisitions) and the right MTL (one acquisition). Participants were repositioned between the two left HERMES acquisitions. An ANOVA was used to assess differences between acquisitions. To assess measurement variation in the repeated left of GABA+ and GSH measures within the left MTL difference values and coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated.
Results
There were no significant differences in metabolite values between any of the acquisitions. The mean difference between the metabolite measures from the repeated left acquisitions centred close to zero, and the average CVs were 14.09 % for GABA+ and 18.94 % for GSH.
Comparison with existing methods
The CVs of GABA+ and GSH in the MTL obtained from a HERMES acquisition were comparable to GABA+ or GSH-edited acquisitions in this region, and to data from cortical voxels using HERMES acquisitions.
Conclusions
This supports the use of HERMES in the MTL, a challenging region for MRS. However, larger samples and caution in interpretation may be required in repeated-measures designs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.