Contextual Emotions in Organizations: A Latent Profile Analysis of Their Co-Occurrence and Their Effects on Employee Well-Being.

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Laura Petitta, Lixin Jiang, Valerio Ghezzi
{"title":"Contextual Emotions in Organizations: A Latent Profile Analysis of Their Co-Occurrence and Their Effects on Employee Well-Being.","authors":"Laura Petitta, Lixin Jiang, Valerio Ghezzi","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe15070122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Workplace contextual emotions are structured ways of emotionally thinking about specific cues in the context that employees share within their organization. These dynamics reflect how employees emotionally interpret and respond to organizational environments. Contextual emotions may shape working relationships into different types of toxic emotional dynamics (e.g., claiming, controlling, distrusting, provoking) or, conversely, positive emotional dynamics (i.e., exchanging), thus setting the emotional tone that affects employees' actions and their level of comfort/discomfort. The present study uses latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subpopulations of employees who may experience differing levels of both positive and negative emotional dynamics (i.e., different configurations of emotional patterns of workplace behavior). Moreover, it examines whether the emergent profiles predict work-related (i.e., job satisfaction, burnout) and health-related outcomes (i.e., sleep disturbances, physical and mental health). Using data from 801 Italian employees, we identified four latent profiles: \"functional dynamics\" (low toxic emotions and high exchange), \"dialectical dynamics\" (co-existence of medium toxic emotions and medium exchange), \"mild dysfunctional dynamics\" (moderately high toxic emotions and low exchange), and \"highly dysfunctional dynamics\" (extremely high toxic emotions and extremely low exchange). Moreover, employees in the dialectical, mild dysfunctional, and highly dysfunctional groups reported progressively higher levels of poor health outcomes and progressively lower levels of satisfaction, whereas the functional group was at low risk of stress and was the most satisfied group. The theoretical and practical implications of the LPA-classified emotional patterns of workplace behavior are discussed in light of the relevance of identifying vulnerable subpopulations of employees diversely exposed to toxic configurations of emotional/relational ambience.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296042/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe15070122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplace contextual emotions are structured ways of emotionally thinking about specific cues in the context that employees share within their organization. These dynamics reflect how employees emotionally interpret and respond to organizational environments. Contextual emotions may shape working relationships into different types of toxic emotional dynamics (e.g., claiming, controlling, distrusting, provoking) or, conversely, positive emotional dynamics (i.e., exchanging), thus setting the emotional tone that affects employees' actions and their level of comfort/discomfort. The present study uses latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subpopulations of employees who may experience differing levels of both positive and negative emotional dynamics (i.e., different configurations of emotional patterns of workplace behavior). Moreover, it examines whether the emergent profiles predict work-related (i.e., job satisfaction, burnout) and health-related outcomes (i.e., sleep disturbances, physical and mental health). Using data from 801 Italian employees, we identified four latent profiles: "functional dynamics" (low toxic emotions and high exchange), "dialectical dynamics" (co-existence of medium toxic emotions and medium exchange), "mild dysfunctional dynamics" (moderately high toxic emotions and low exchange), and "highly dysfunctional dynamics" (extremely high toxic emotions and extremely low exchange). Moreover, employees in the dialectical, mild dysfunctional, and highly dysfunctional groups reported progressively higher levels of poor health outcomes and progressively lower levels of satisfaction, whereas the functional group was at low risk of stress and was the most satisfied group. The theoretical and practical implications of the LPA-classified emotional patterns of workplace behavior are discussed in light of the relevance of identifying vulnerable subpopulations of employees diversely exposed to toxic configurations of emotional/relational ambience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

组织中的情境情绪:共现的潜在特征分析及其对员工幸福感的影响。
工作场所情境情绪是员工在组织中分享的情境中对特定线索进行情感思考的结构化方式。这些动态反映了员工在情感上对组织环境的理解和反应。情境情绪可能会将工作关系塑造成不同类型的有毒情绪动态(例如,要求、控制、不信任、挑衅)或相反的积极情绪动态(例如,交换),从而确定影响员工行为和他们舒适/不舒服程度的情绪基调。本研究使用潜在剖面分析(LPA)来识别可能经历不同水平的积极和消极情绪动态的员工亚群(即工作场所行为的不同情绪模式配置)。此外,它还检验了紧急概况是否能预测与工作相关的结果(即工作满意度、倦怠)和与健康相关的结果(即睡眠障碍、身心健康)。利用801名意大利员工的数据,我们确定了四种潜在的特征:“功能动力学”(低毒性情绪和高交换)、“辩证动力学”(中等毒性情绪和中等交换共存)、“轻度功能失调动力学”(中等毒性情绪和低交换)和“高度功能失调动力学”(极高毒性情绪和极低交换)。此外,辩证组、轻度功能失调组和高度功能失调组的员工报告的不良健康结果水平逐渐升高,满意度水平逐渐降低,而功能组的压力风险较低,满意度最高。本文讨论了lpa分类的工作场所行为情绪模式的理论和实践意义,以确定不同暴露于有毒情绪/关系环境配置的员工的弱势亚群的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信