Inter-limb and handedness differences in the adaptation to brief movement perturbations.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1152/jn.00592.2024
Weiwei Zhou, Katelyn Haly, Neena Deshpande, Wilsaan M Joiner
{"title":"Inter-limb and handedness differences in the adaptation to brief movement perturbations.","authors":"Weiwei Zhou, Katelyn Haly, Neena Deshpande, Wilsaan M Joiner","doi":"10.1152/jn.00592.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Handedness or limb preference is a well-known aspect of upper-limb motor control lateralization. However, its impact on motor adaptation remains poorly understood. Here, using brief, force perturbations, we examined how inter-limb and handedness differences influence the online corrective response and adaptation when movement was randomly disrupted. We tested both limbs of human subjects (<i>n</i> = 50, 33 females) who exhibited different hand preferences. The correction to the perturbation (applied early, late, or mid-movement) was similar between limbs, but was significantly different between right- and left-handed individuals, with mixed-handed subjects falling in between. Similar to the corrections, the total force generated during the adaptive response differed significantly between right- and left-handed individuals, and in the majority of cases, mixed-handed subjects again fell between the two. In addition, the single-trial adaptation to the perturbation (i.e., the temporal force profile) was well-characterized by a linear combination of the scaled movement kinematics (i.e., the limb motion states-longitudinal position and velocity). Interestingly, handedness had less influence on how this movement information was integrated in the adaptive response; the dependence of the temporal pattern of force on movement velocity and position changed based on when the perturbation occurred and was significantly modified more for the left limb compared with the right. However, this spatiotemporal modulation was similar for right- and left-handed groups, but distinctly different for mixed-handed subjects. These results demonstrate <i>1</i>) a systematic difference in motor corrections based on handedness and <i>2</i>) inter-limb differences in how spatiotemporal properties influence the integration of motion-state information.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> This study characterized performance differences influenced by handedness in upper limb motor control. Correction to movement perturbations changed based on handedness, with mixed-handed subjects showing behavior that was between right- and left-handed individuals. In addition, the motion state dependence of the adaptive response varied between limbs, with the left limb showing more sensitivity to the temporal properties of the perturbation. Our results provide novel insight into how handedness is reflected in the coding of limb motion.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"766-782"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00592.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Handedness or limb preference is a well-known aspect of upper-limb motor control lateralization. However, its impact on motor adaptation remains poorly understood. Here, using brief, force perturbations, we examined how inter-limb and handedness differences influence the online corrective response and adaptation when movement was randomly disrupted. We tested both limbs of human subjects (n = 50, 33 females) who exhibited different hand preferences. The correction to the perturbation (applied early, late, or mid-movement) was similar between limbs, but was significantly different between right- and left-handed individuals, with mixed-handed subjects falling in between. Similar to the corrections, the total force generated during the adaptive response differed significantly between right- and left-handed individuals, and in the majority of cases, mixed-handed subjects again fell between the two. In addition, the single-trial adaptation to the perturbation (i.e., the temporal force profile) was well-characterized by a linear combination of the scaled movement kinematics (i.e., the limb motion states-longitudinal position and velocity). Interestingly, handedness had less influence on how this movement information was integrated in the adaptive response; the dependence of the temporal pattern of force on movement velocity and position changed based on when the perturbation occurred and was significantly modified more for the left limb compared with the right. However, this spatiotemporal modulation was similar for right- and left-handed groups, but distinctly different for mixed-handed subjects. These results demonstrate 1) a systematic difference in motor corrections based on handedness and 2) inter-limb differences in how spatiotemporal properties influence the integration of motion-state information.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study characterized performance differences influenced by handedness in upper limb motor control. Correction to movement perturbations changed based on handedness, with mixed-handed subjects showing behavior that was between right- and left-handed individuals. In addition, the motion state dependence of the adaptive response varied between limbs, with the left limb showing more sensitivity to the temporal properties of the perturbation. Our results provide novel insight into how handedness is reflected in the coding of limb motion.

肢间和手性对短暂运动扰动的适应差异。
利手性或肢体偏好是上肢运动控制偏侧化的一个众所周知的方面。然而,它对运动适应的影响仍然知之甚少。在这里,我们使用简短的力扰动,研究了当运动随机中断时,肢体间和手性差异如何影响在线纠正反应和适应。我们测试了人类受试者的四肢(N = 50,33名女性),他们表现出不同的手部偏好。对扰动的修正(应用于运动的早期、晚期或中期)在四肢之间是相似的,但在右撇子和左撇子个体之间存在显著差异,而混合手的受试者介于两者之间。与校正相似,在适应反应中产生的总力在右撇子和左撇子个体之间有显著差异,在大多数情况下,混合手的受试者再次落在两者之间。此外,对扰动(即时间力剖面)的单次试验适应可以通过缩放运动运动学(即肢体运动状态-纵向位置和速度)的线性组合来很好地表征。有趣的是,惯用手对运动信息在适应性反应中的整合影响较小;力的时间模式对运动速度和位置的依赖关系根据摄动发生的时间而变化,并且左肢体比右肢体更明显地改变。然而,这种时空调制在右撇子组和左撇子组中是相似的,但在混合手受试者中则明显不同。这些结果表明:1)基于利手性的运动校正存在系统性差异;2)肢体间时空特性对运动状态信息整合的影响存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信