Lidia Sacchelli, Marta Fusano, Laura Colli, Valentina Trevisan, Rossana Capezzera, Federica Cavallini, Lisa Cecchini, Rosa Frisario, Luciano Galotta, Maria T Luverà, Giovanni Menchini, Luigia Panariello, Michela Starace, Federica Trovato, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Federica Osti
{"title":"Ethical and professional use of social media: Consensus of Italian Dermatologists active on social media.","authors":"Lidia Sacchelli, Marta Fusano, Laura Colli, Valentina Trevisan, Rossana Capezzera, Federica Cavallini, Lisa Cecchini, Rosa Frisario, Luciano Galotta, Maria T Luverà, Giovanni Menchini, Luigia Panariello, Michela Starace, Federica Trovato, Andrea Vizzaccaro, Federica Osti","doi":"10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08264-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media has transformed medical communication, providing dermatologists with opportunities for public education, professional visibility, and patient engagement. However, ethical and professional concerns arise due to the lack of dermatology-specific guidelines in Italy. While the National Federation of Orders of Physicians and Dentists (FNOMCeO) offers general recommendations, no targeted framework exists to regulate dermatologists' digital presence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the 32nd Annual AIDA Congress in May 2024, a working group of 23 dermatologists with active online engagement was formed. Existing ethical frameworks, including the Code of Medical Ethics, were reviewed to identify regulatory gaps. A core team drafted 12 statements, which were refined through a structured discussion and a vote to reach consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The working group developed 12 best practice statements covering key aspects of ethical online engagement, including responsible social media use, conflict-of-interest disclosures, adherence to scientific evidence, patient privacy, and the fight against misinformation. These statements establish clear principles to guide dermatologists in their digital communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first dermatology-specific digital communication consensus in Italy, addressing an urgent need for ethical regulation. These recommendations provide a structured framework for dermatologists, ensuring responsible online engagement while maximizing public health impact. Further regulatory efforts are essential to maintain high professional and ethical standards in the digital era.</p>","PeriodicalId":14526,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":" ","pages":"413-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.25.08264-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Social media has transformed medical communication, providing dermatologists with opportunities for public education, professional visibility, and patient engagement. However, ethical and professional concerns arise due to the lack of dermatology-specific guidelines in Italy. While the National Federation of Orders of Physicians and Dentists (FNOMCeO) offers general recommendations, no targeted framework exists to regulate dermatologists' digital presence.
Methods: During the 32nd Annual AIDA Congress in May 2024, a working group of 23 dermatologists with active online engagement was formed. Existing ethical frameworks, including the Code of Medical Ethics, were reviewed to identify regulatory gaps. A core team drafted 12 statements, which were refined through a structured discussion and a vote to reach consensus.
Results: The working group developed 12 best practice statements covering key aspects of ethical online engagement, including responsible social media use, conflict-of-interest disclosures, adherence to scientific evidence, patient privacy, and the fight against misinformation. These statements establish clear principles to guide dermatologists in their digital communication.
Conclusions: This is the first dermatology-specific digital communication consensus in Italy, addressing an urgent need for ethical regulation. These recommendations provide a structured framework for dermatologists, ensuring responsible online engagement while maximizing public health impact. Further regulatory efforts are essential to maintain high professional and ethical standards in the digital era.