Effect of experimental and clinical pain on the spatial distribution of muscle activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2025.1603807
Guillermo Mendez-Rebolledo, Ignacio Orozco-Chavez, Joaquín Salazar-Méndez, Juan Morales-Verdugo, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes
{"title":"Effect of experimental and clinical pain on the spatial distribution of muscle activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Guillermo Mendez-Rebolledo, Ignacio Orozco-Chavez, Joaquín Salazar-Méndez, Juan Morales-Verdugo, Eduardo Martinez-Valdes","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2025.1603807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Musculoskeletal dysfunctions can significantly impair quality of life due to persistent pain and neuromuscular adaptations. While regional activation patterns in healthy muscles are well-documented, the effects of clinical and experimental pain on these patterns remain inconsistent. Accordingly, this study systematically evaluates the scientific evidence on alterations in the spatial distribution of muscle activity, quantified by shifts in the center of activity of high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals, under experimental and clinical pain conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive database search was conducted from inception to June 6, 2025. The review included studies that evaluated the spatial distribution of muscle activity with HD-sEMG, analyzing two-dimensional shifts in the center of activity among individuals with clinical or experimentally induced pain. Methodological quality was assessed using the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and evidence certainty was evaluated with the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was employed in the meta-analysis to account for variability across studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies involving 562 participants (231 control, 266 clinical pain, and 65 experimental pain) were included. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant shift in the center of activity in individuals with clinical pain compared with asymptomatic controls (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.84; <i>p</i> = 0.004), particularly those with chronic low back pain, with a low effect size (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.83; <i>p</i> = 0.04), indicating altered spatial distribution of muscle activity. A meta-analysis for experimental pain was not feasible due to limited data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings underscore that clinical pain is associated with altered spatial distribution of muscle activity and emphasize the need for standardized methodologies and further research across diverse populations to enhance pain management and rehabilitation strategies.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (identifier CRD42024534320), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024534320.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1603807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12287016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2025.1603807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal dysfunctions can significantly impair quality of life due to persistent pain and neuromuscular adaptations. While regional activation patterns in healthy muscles are well-documented, the effects of clinical and experimental pain on these patterns remain inconsistent. Accordingly, this study systematically evaluates the scientific evidence on alterations in the spatial distribution of muscle activity, quantified by shifts in the center of activity of high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals, under experimental and clinical pain conditions.

Methods: A comprehensive database search was conducted from inception to June 6, 2025. The review included studies that evaluated the spatial distribution of muscle activity with HD-sEMG, analyzing two-dimensional shifts in the center of activity among individuals with clinical or experimentally induced pain. Methodological quality was assessed using the adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and evidence certainty was evaluated with the GRADE approach. A random-effects model was employed in the meta-analysis to account for variability across studies.

Results: Twenty studies involving 562 participants (231 control, 266 clinical pain, and 65 experimental pain) were included. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant shift in the center of activity in individuals with clinical pain compared with asymptomatic controls (SMD = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.84; p = 0.004), particularly those with chronic low back pain, with a low effect size (SMD = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.83; p = 0.04), indicating altered spatial distribution of muscle activity. A meta-analysis for experimental pain was not feasible due to limited data.

Conclusions: These findings underscore that clinical pain is associated with altered spatial distribution of muscle activity and emphasize the need for standardized methodologies and further research across diverse populations to enhance pain management and rehabilitation strategies.

Systematic review registration: This study was prospectively registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (identifier CRD42024534320), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024534320.

实验和临床疼痛对肌肉活动空间分布的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介:肌肉骨骼功能障碍由于持续疼痛和神经肌肉适应而严重影响生活质量。虽然健康肌肉的区域激活模式有充分的文献记载,但临床和实验疼痛对这些模式的影响仍然不一致。因此,本研究系统地评估了在实验和临床疼痛条件下,通过高密度肌表电(HD-sEMG)信号活动中心的移动来量化肌肉活动空间分布变化的科学证据。方法:全面检索自成立至2025年6月6日的数据库。这篇综述包括了用HD-sEMG评估肌肉活动空间分布的研究,分析了临床或实验诱发疼痛的个体活动中心的二维变化。方法质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估,证据确定性采用GRADE方法进行评估。在荟萃分析中采用随机效应模型来解释研究之间的可变性。结果:共纳入20项研究,涉及562名受试者(对照组231人,临床疼痛组266人,实验性疼痛组65人)。荟萃分析显示,与无症状对照组相比,有临床疼痛的个体活动中心发生了统计学上显著的变化(SMD = 0.49;95% CI = 0.15 ~ 1.84;p = 0.004),特别是慢性腰痛患者,其效应量较低(SMD = 0.43;95% CI = 0.03 ~ 0.83;P = 0.04),表明肌肉活动的空间分布发生了改变。由于数据有限,实验性疼痛的荟萃分析不可行。结论:这些发现强调了临床疼痛与肌肉活动空间分布的改变有关,并强调了标准化方法和在不同人群中进一步研究的必要性,以加强疼痛管理和康复策略。系统评价注册:本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)(标识符CRD42024534320), https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024534320上前瞻性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信