Description of probiotic use in preterm infants in England and Wales 2016-2022.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Alice Aveline, Lisa Szatkowski, Janet Berrington, Kate Costeloe, Alex Bottle, Shalini Ojha, Paul Fleming, Cheryl Battersby
{"title":"Description of probiotic use in preterm infants in England and Wales 2016-2022.","authors":"Alice Aveline, Lisa Szatkowski, Janet Berrington, Kate Costeloe, Alex Bottle, Shalini Ojha, Paul Fleming, Cheryl Battersby","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of probiotics among preterm infants in neonatal units and explore factors that influence exposure.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational study using prospectively recorded health data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>England and Wales.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>48 048 infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to a neonatal unit between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Measures of probiotic use (number and proportion of infants exposed to probiotics, postnatal age of first probiotic exposure and discontinuation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of infants who received probiotics increased from 9% to 54% over the study period. Median GA of infants given probiotics was 29<sup>+3</sup> weeks (IQR 27<sup>+3</sup>-30<sup>+6</sup>). Probiotics were started on median day 5 (IQR 2-8), earlier for those born at >28 weeks GA (median day 4, IQR 2-7), most frequently after enteral feeds (66% of exposed infants) and were usually discontinued between 32 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (47% at 32<sup>+0</sup>-33<sup>+6</sup> weeks PMA, 33% at 34<sup>+0</sup>-35<sup>+6</sup> weeks PMA). Among infants cared for in probiotic neonatal intensive care units (defined as units where 50% or more infants born <32 weeks gestation were exposed to probiotics), 23% were never given probiotics. Infants from whom probiotics were withheld had a lower gestational age, lower birth weight z score and higher illness severity score or were more mature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By 2022, over half of infants born at <32 weeks GA were exposed to probiotics, but almost one quarter did not receive them despite being in a probiotic unit. Our findings help inform the interpretation of observational data and the design of future studies addressing the continued uncertainty around the safety and efficacy of probiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306256/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the use of probiotics among preterm infants in neonatal units and explore factors that influence exposure.

Design: Observational study using prospectively recorded health data.

Setting: England and Wales.

Patients: 48 048 infants born at <32 weeks gestational age (GA) and admitted to a neonatal unit between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022.

Main outcome measures: Measures of probiotic use (number and proportion of infants exposed to probiotics, postnatal age of first probiotic exposure and discontinuation).

Results: The proportion of infants who received probiotics increased from 9% to 54% over the study period. Median GA of infants given probiotics was 29+3 weeks (IQR 27+3-30+6). Probiotics were started on median day 5 (IQR 2-8), earlier for those born at >28 weeks GA (median day 4, IQR 2-7), most frequently after enteral feeds (66% of exposed infants) and were usually discontinued between 32 and 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) (47% at 32+0-33+6 weeks PMA, 33% at 34+0-35+6 weeks PMA). Among infants cared for in probiotic neonatal intensive care units (defined as units where 50% or more infants born <32 weeks gestation were exposed to probiotics), 23% were never given probiotics. Infants from whom probiotics were withheld had a lower gestational age, lower birth weight z score and higher illness severity score or were more mature.

Conclusions: By 2022, over half of infants born at <32 weeks GA were exposed to probiotics, but almost one quarter did not receive them despite being in a probiotic unit. Our findings help inform the interpretation of observational data and the design of future studies addressing the continued uncertainty around the safety and efficacy of probiotics.

2016-2022年英格兰和威尔士早产儿益生菌使用情况描述
目的:了解新生儿科早产儿益生菌的使用情况,并探讨其影响因素。设计:观察性研究,使用前瞻性记录的健康数据。环境:英格兰和威尔士。主要结果测量:使用益生菌的测量(接触益生菌的婴儿数量和比例,出生后首次接触益生菌和停药的年龄)。结果:在研究期间,接受益生菌的婴儿比例从9%增加到54%。给予益生菌的婴儿平均GA为29+3周(IQR 27+3-30+6)。益生菌开始于中位数第5天(IQR 2-8),对于出生在bbb28周的婴儿(中位数第4天,IQR 2-7)更早,最常见的是在肠内喂养后(66%的暴露婴儿),通常在月经后32至36周(PMA)之间停止(47%为32+0-33+6周PMA, 33%为34+0-35+6周PMA)。在益生菌新生儿重症监护病房(定义为50%或更多婴儿出生的病房)中接受护理的婴儿中结论:到2022年,超过一半的婴儿出生在益生菌新生儿重症监护病房
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信