{"title":"Psychological flexibility as a mediator and mechanism of change in disordered eating: a systematic review.","authors":"Karen Goshen, Eyal Heled","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Psychological flexibility (PF) is increasingly considered as a prospective mediator of disordered eating, due to its contextual nature and theoretical association with disordered eating development and maintenance. However, the extent of its efficacy remains unclear. The present study aims to systematically review all available evidence on PF as a unique mediator or mechanism of change in disordered eating, encompassing both cross-sectional and intervention studies. This review followed the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework throughout. A literature search using PubMed, PsycINFO and Google Scholar databases on cross-sectional and intervention studies was conducted, that identified 19 articles and 27 separate mediation analyses as eligible. PF was found to be a consistent mediator among thirteen risk factors and disordered eating levels in cross-sectional studies, including BMI, body dissatisfaction, self-esteem and external shame. However, the intervention studies showed little confidence for PF to be a successful mechanism of change, potentially due to methodological concerns. The strongest effects were indicated for high-weight individuals and adolescent populations, with weaker indications for males, which has important clinical implications. Future research should improve methodological rigor, as well as refining PF conceptualization and incorporating more positive PF measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Psychological flexibility (PF) is increasingly considered as a prospective mediator of disordered eating, due to its contextual nature and theoretical association with disordered eating development and maintenance. However, the extent of its efficacy remains unclear. The present study aims to systematically review all available evidence on PF as a unique mediator or mechanism of change in disordered eating, encompassing both cross-sectional and intervention studies. This review followed the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework throughout. A literature search using PubMed, PsycINFO and Google Scholar databases on cross-sectional and intervention studies was conducted, that identified 19 articles and 27 separate mediation analyses as eligible. PF was found to be a consistent mediator among thirteen risk factors and disordered eating levels in cross-sectional studies, including BMI, body dissatisfaction, self-esteem and external shame. However, the intervention studies showed little confidence for PF to be a successful mechanism of change, potentially due to methodological concerns. The strongest effects were indicated for high-weight individuals and adolescent populations, with weaker indications for males, which has important clinical implications. Future research should improve methodological rigor, as well as refining PF conceptualization and incorporating more positive PF measures.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.