Welfare of beef cattle

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW), Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Julio Alvarez, Anette Boklund, Sabine Dippel, Fernanda Dorea, Jordi Figuerola, Mette S. Herskin, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca, Eleonora Nannoni, Romolo Nonno, Anja B. Riber, Karl Stahl, Jan Arend Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Frank Tuyttens, Giulio Cozzi, Ute Knierim, Sònia Martí, Siobhan Mullan, Sean Ashe, Giulia Cecchinato, Eliana Lima, Olaf Mosbach-Schulz, Marika Vitali, Martina Benedetta Zanna, Christoph Winckler
{"title":"Welfare of beef cattle","authors":"EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW),&nbsp;Søren Saxmose Nielsen,&nbsp;Julio Alvarez,&nbsp;Anette Boklund,&nbsp;Sabine Dippel,&nbsp;Fernanda Dorea,&nbsp;Jordi Figuerola,&nbsp;Mette S. Herskin,&nbsp;Virginie Michel,&nbsp;Miguel Angel Miranda Chueca,&nbsp;Eleonora Nannoni,&nbsp;Romolo Nonno,&nbsp;Anja B. Riber,&nbsp;Karl Stahl,&nbsp;Jan Arend Stegeman,&nbsp;Hans-Hermann Thulke,&nbsp;Frank Tuyttens,&nbsp;Giulio Cozzi,&nbsp;Ute Knierim,&nbsp;Sònia Martí,&nbsp;Siobhan Mullan,&nbsp;Sean Ashe,&nbsp;Giulia Cecchinato,&nbsp;Eliana Lima,&nbsp;Olaf Mosbach-Schulz,&nbsp;Marika Vitali,&nbsp;Martina Benedetta Zanna,&nbsp;Christoph Winckler","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This Scientific Opinion provides an assessment of beef cattle welfare focusing on risks related to flooring, water access, nutrition and feeding, high environmental temperatures, lack of environmental enrichment, lack of outdoor access, minimum space allowance and mixing practices. In addition, risks related to pasture and feedlots, weaning of suckler calves, mutilations (castration, disbudding, dehorning and tail docking), and to breeding practices (hypermuscularity, dystocia and caesarean sections, polledness, maternal ability and temperament) are assessed. Decision-making criteria for the euthanasia of cull cows are also addressed. A selection of animal-based measures (ABMs) suitable for collection at slaughterhouses is proposed to monitor on-farm welfare of fattening cattle. Recommendations to improve the welfare of housed fattening cattle include increasing space allowance and feeding more roughage in relation to current practice, and promoting the use of well-managed bedded solid floors. Provision of enrichment such as brushes and roughage and an outdoor loafing area for housed cattle are recommended. Cattle kept outdoors should have access to a dry lying area and sufficient shade. Water should be provided <i>ad libitum</i> via large open water surfaces, and the use of nipple drinkers should be avoided. Mixing of unfamiliar cattle should be avoided and groups should be kept stable. Mutilations should be abstained from, but if carried out, a combination of analgesia and anaesthesia should be applied regardless of the calf's age. Early weaning of suckler calves should be avoided (&lt; 6 months). Homozygous double-muscled animals should be excluded from breeding. Selected ABMs for collection at slaughterhouses to monitor some of the highly relevant welfare consequences experienced by fattening cattle on farm are body condition, carcass fat levels, carcass condemnation, lung lesions and skin lesions. Key data gaps identified are thresholds for dietary fibre, ABM thresholds for fitness for transport and potential long-term effects of mutilations on pain sensitisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This Scientific Opinion provides an assessment of beef cattle welfare focusing on risks related to flooring, water access, nutrition and feeding, high environmental temperatures, lack of environmental enrichment, lack of outdoor access, minimum space allowance and mixing practices. In addition, risks related to pasture and feedlots, weaning of suckler calves, mutilations (castration, disbudding, dehorning and tail docking), and to breeding practices (hypermuscularity, dystocia and caesarean sections, polledness, maternal ability and temperament) are assessed. Decision-making criteria for the euthanasia of cull cows are also addressed. A selection of animal-based measures (ABMs) suitable for collection at slaughterhouses is proposed to monitor on-farm welfare of fattening cattle. Recommendations to improve the welfare of housed fattening cattle include increasing space allowance and feeding more roughage in relation to current practice, and promoting the use of well-managed bedded solid floors. Provision of enrichment such as brushes and roughage and an outdoor loafing area for housed cattle are recommended. Cattle kept outdoors should have access to a dry lying area and sufficient shade. Water should be provided ad libitum via large open water surfaces, and the use of nipple drinkers should be avoided. Mixing of unfamiliar cattle should be avoided and groups should be kept stable. Mutilations should be abstained from, but if carried out, a combination of analgesia and anaesthesia should be applied regardless of the calf's age. Early weaning of suckler calves should be avoided (< 6 months). Homozygous double-muscled animals should be excluded from breeding. Selected ABMs for collection at slaughterhouses to monitor some of the highly relevant welfare consequences experienced by fattening cattle on farm are body condition, carcass fat levels, carcass condemnation, lung lesions and skin lesions. Key data gaps identified are thresholds for dietary fibre, ABM thresholds for fitness for transport and potential long-term effects of mutilations on pain sensitisation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肉牛福利
本《科学意见》对肉牛福利进行了评估,重点关注与地板、取水、营养和饲养、环境高温、缺乏环境富集、缺乏室外通道、最小空间允许和混合做法相关的风险。此外,还评估了牧场和饲养场、乳牛断奶、残肢(阉割、脱芽、去角和截尾)以及育种方法(肌肉肥大、难产和剖宫产、授粉、母畜能力和气质)相关的风险。还讨论了宰杀牛安乐死的决策标准。提出了一种适合在屠宰场收集的基于动物的措施(ABMs),以监测育肥牛的农场福利。改善圈养育肥牛福利的建议包括:与目前的做法相比,增加饲养空间和饲喂更多粗饲料,并推广使用管理良好的床状固体地板。建议提供诸如刷子和粗饲料之类的营养品,并为圈养的牛提供室外放养区。在户外饲养的牛应该有一个干燥的躺卧区和足够的树荫。应通过大的开放水面随意提供水,并应避免使用乳头饮用器。应避免不熟悉的牛混合,群体应保持稳定。应避免残割,但如果进行残割,无论小牛的年龄,都应采用镇痛和麻醉相结合的方法。应避免哺乳小牛过早断奶(6个月)。纯合子的双肌动物应排除在繁殖之外。在屠宰场收集选定的ABMs,以监测农场育肥牛所经历的一些高度相关的福利后果,包括身体状况、胴体脂肪水平、胴体谴责、肺部病变和皮肤病变。确定的关键数据缺口是膳食纤维的阈值,运输适应性的ABM阈值以及残肢对疼痛敏感的潜在长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信