Measuring the First Mover Advantage in US Biosimilar Markets.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
J Daniel McGeeney, Aylin Sertkaya, Samantha A McCormick, Andreas Lord, Ayesha Berlind, Sonal Parasrampuria, Michael L Lanthier, Trinidad Beleche, Nicholas C Holtkamp
{"title":"Measuring the First Mover Advantage in US Biosimilar Markets.","authors":"J Daniel McGeeney, Aylin Sertkaya, Samantha A McCormick, Andreas Lord, Ayesha Berlind, Sonal Parasrampuria, Michael L Lanthier, Trinidad Beleche, Nicholas C Holtkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We project market share trends to estimate the median long-run, steady-state market share advantage of first movers in US biosimilar markets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the IQVIA National Sales Perspective data to calculate monthly active pharmaceutical ingredient unit sales in 6 US biosimilar markets (bevacizumab, filgrastim, infliximab, pegfilgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab) from the third quarter of 2015 through the fourth quarter of 2023. We fit trends to each product's share of the biosimilar market and projected long-run steady-state values using modified exponential decay functions for first movers and logistic growth functions for later entrants. We compared the median steady-state market share of the first mover to that of later entrants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 4 of 6 US biosimilar markets studied, we project the first-mover to earn more market share in the long run than all later entrants. First movers will earn a long-run steady-state market share that is between 8.9 and 12.0 percentage points higher than the second entrant, depending on the number of biosimilar competitors in the market. Considering the size of biologic markets, each percentage point potentially represents $5 million in annual sales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In 4 of 6 US markets analyzed, the first biosimilar entrant has a long-run steady-state advantage over all later entrants, which is in addition to the short-run benefit of higher prices. To date, several biosimilar developers have entered the US market before resolving all patent issues. The first mover's long-term advantage may be sizable in dollar terms, which could partially explain this behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We project market share trends to estimate the median long-run, steady-state market share advantage of first movers in US biosimilar markets.

Methods: We used the IQVIA National Sales Perspective data to calculate monthly active pharmaceutical ingredient unit sales in 6 US biosimilar markets (bevacizumab, filgrastim, infliximab, pegfilgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab) from the third quarter of 2015 through the fourth quarter of 2023. We fit trends to each product's share of the biosimilar market and projected long-run steady-state values using modified exponential decay functions for first movers and logistic growth functions for later entrants. We compared the median steady-state market share of the first mover to that of later entrants.

Results: In 4 of 6 US biosimilar markets studied, we project the first-mover to earn more market share in the long run than all later entrants. First movers will earn a long-run steady-state market share that is between 8.9 and 12.0 percentage points higher than the second entrant, depending on the number of biosimilar competitors in the market. Considering the size of biologic markets, each percentage point potentially represents $5 million in annual sales.

Conclusions: In 4 of 6 US markets analyzed, the first biosimilar entrant has a long-run steady-state advantage over all later entrants, which is in addition to the short-run benefit of higher prices. To date, several biosimilar developers have entered the US market before resolving all patent issues. The first mover's long-term advantage may be sizable in dollar terms, which could partially explain this behavior.

衡量美国生物仿制药市场的先发优势
目的:我们预测市场份额趋势,以估计美国生物类似药市场中先行者的长期稳定市场份额优势。方法:我们使用IQVIA National Sales Perspective数据计算了2015年第三季度至2023年第四季度美国六个生物类似药市场(贝伐单抗、非格昔汀、英夫利昔单抗、pegfilgrastim、利妥昔单抗、曲妥珠单抗)的月度活性药物成分单位销量。我们拟合了每种产品在生物仿制药市场份额的趋势,并使用修正的指数衰减函数对先行者和逻辑增长函数对后来者预测了长期稳态值。我们比较了先行者和后来者的中位数稳态市场份额。结果:在研究的6个美国生物仿制药市场中,我们预测先行者在长期内比所有后来者获得更多的市场份额。根据市场上生物仿制药竞争者的数量,先行者将获得比第二进入者高8.9 - 12.0个百分点的长期稳定市场份额。考虑到生物制品市场的规模,每一个百分点都可能代表500万美元的年销售额。结论:在所分析的6个美国市场中,有4个市场中,第一个生物仿制药进入者比所有后进入者具有长期的稳态优势,这是除了较高价格的短期利益之外。迄今为止,一些生物仿制药开发商在解决所有专利问题之前就进入了美国市场。以美元计算,先行者的长期优势可能相当大,这可以部分解释这种行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信