Exploring the pros and cons of plant-based egg alternatives – A review

IF 4.1 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Ahmadullah Zahir , Shazia Akhter
{"title":"Exploring the pros and cons of plant-based egg alternatives – A review","authors":"Ahmadullah Zahir ,&nbsp;Shazia Akhter","doi":"10.1016/j.nfs.2025.100241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global population is projected to surpass 10 billion by 2050, intensifying the demand for agricultural food production to nourish this expanding number. Amidst rising climate change, pollution, and global crises, the increasing need for plant-based food items, including plant-based eggs, presents a viable path for environmental protection and health enhancement, fostering the development and adoption of plant-based egg alternatives. The food industry's growing interest in these egg substitutes is influenced by several factors, including consumer preference, reduced allergen content, improved food safety, healthier nutritional profiles, greater ease of handling and storage, enhanced functionality, cost-effectiveness with reduced price volatility, and a focus on environmental sustainability. These alternatives are commonly derived from various plant-based ingredients, including mung beans, chickpeas, soy, and various starches. Despite the market's expansion, significant challenges for researchers include ensuring the versatility and superior rheological and nutritional properties of these substitutes. Additionally, it is crucial to consider antinutritional factors and allergens present in the plant compounds used for egg alternatives when developing these products. This review will assess the advantages and disadvantages of plant-based egg substitutes, examining key aspects, including nutritional value, environmental impact, taste and texture, cost, and their effect on consumer acceptance and overall health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19294,"journal":{"name":"NFS Journal","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NFS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352364625000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global population is projected to surpass 10 billion by 2050, intensifying the demand for agricultural food production to nourish this expanding number. Amidst rising climate change, pollution, and global crises, the increasing need for plant-based food items, including plant-based eggs, presents a viable path for environmental protection and health enhancement, fostering the development and adoption of plant-based egg alternatives. The food industry's growing interest in these egg substitutes is influenced by several factors, including consumer preference, reduced allergen content, improved food safety, healthier nutritional profiles, greater ease of handling and storage, enhanced functionality, cost-effectiveness with reduced price volatility, and a focus on environmental sustainability. These alternatives are commonly derived from various plant-based ingredients, including mung beans, chickpeas, soy, and various starches. Despite the market's expansion, significant challenges for researchers include ensuring the versatility and superior rheological and nutritional properties of these substitutes. Additionally, it is crucial to consider antinutritional factors and allergens present in the plant compounds used for egg alternatives when developing these products. This review will assess the advantages and disadvantages of plant-based egg substitutes, examining key aspects, including nutritional value, environmental impact, taste and texture, cost, and their effect on consumer acceptance and overall health.
探索植物性鸡蛋替代品的利弊-综述
到2050年,全球人口预计将超过100亿,这将加大对农业粮食生产的需求,以养活这一不断增长的人口。随着气候变化、污染和全球危机的加剧,对植物性食品(包括植物性鸡蛋)的需求日益增加,为环境保护和增进健康提供了一条可行的途径,促进了植物性鸡蛋替代品的开发和采用。食品行业对这些鸡蛋替代品日益增长的兴趣受到几个因素的影响,包括消费者偏好、减少过敏原含量、提高食品安全、更健康的营养状况、更容易处理和储存、增强功能、降低价格波动的成本效益,以及对环境可持续性的关注。这些替代品通常来源于各种植物性成分,包括绿豆、鹰嘴豆、大豆和各种淀粉。尽管市场在扩大,但研究人员面临的重大挑战包括确保这些替代品的多功能性和优越的流变学和营养特性。此外,在开发这些产品时,考虑用于鸡蛋替代品的植物化合物中存在的抗营养因子和过敏原是至关重要的。本综述将评估植物性鸡蛋替代品的优缺点,审查关键方面,包括营养价值、环境影响、味道和质地、成本以及它们对消费者接受度和整体健康的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NFS Journal
NFS Journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The NFS Journal publishes high-quality original research articles and methods papers presenting cutting-edge scientific advances as well as review articles on current topics in all areas of nutrition and food science. The journal particularly invites submission of articles that deal with subjects on the interface of nutrition and food research and thus connect both disciplines. The journal offers a new form of submission Registered Reports (see below). NFS Journal is a forum for research in the following areas: • Understanding the role of dietary factors (macronutrients and micronutrients, phytochemicals, bioactive lipids and peptides etc.) in disease prevention and maintenance of optimum health • Prevention of diet- and age-related pathologies by nutritional approaches • Advances in food technology and food formulation (e.g. novel strategies to reduce salt, sugar, or trans-fat contents etc.) • Nutrition and food genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics • Identification and characterization of food components • Dietary sources and intake of nutrients and bioactive compounds • Food authentication and quality • Nanotechnology in nutritional and food sciences • (Bio-) Functional properties of foods • Development and validation of novel analytical and research methods • Age- and gender-differences in biological activities and the bioavailability of vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals and other dietary factors • Food safety and toxicology • Food and nutrition security • Sustainability of food production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信