National pathways for food systems transformation are limited in scope and degree of ambition

Jeroen Candel, Anne J. Sietsma, Robbert Biesbroek
{"title":"National pathways for food systems transformation are limited in scope and degree of ambition","authors":"Jeroen Candel, Anne J. Sietsma, Robbert Biesbroek","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01206-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The 2021 United Nations Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) marked a key moment in deliberating a transformation of the global food system. At the same time, the UNFSS process received considerable criticism for alleged industry capture and high symbolism. Here we assess the extent to which the summit has contributed to ambitious policy follow-up at national level. Using natural language processing tools, we systematically analyse and compare the content of 124 national food system pathway documents. We find that food production dominates these pathways, while issues such as food distribution, processing, consumption, environmental impacts, labour conditions and animal welfare receive minimal attention. Despite different national food system challenges, the pathways show limited variation in topics raised, closely following predefined global agendas. Our results suggest that the policy directions of UNFSS national pathways are mainly within the current food system, while more fundamental critiques of the food system are not raised.</p>","PeriodicalId":19090,"journal":{"name":"Nature Food","volume":"97 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01206-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2021 United Nations Food Systems Summit (UNFSS) marked a key moment in deliberating a transformation of the global food system. At the same time, the UNFSS process received considerable criticism for alleged industry capture and high symbolism. Here we assess the extent to which the summit has contributed to ambitious policy follow-up at national level. Using natural language processing tools, we systematically analyse and compare the content of 124 national food system pathway documents. We find that food production dominates these pathways, while issues such as food distribution, processing, consumption, environmental impacts, labour conditions and animal welfare receive minimal attention. Despite different national food system challenges, the pathways show limited variation in topics raised, closely following predefined global agendas. Our results suggest that the policy directions of UNFSS national pathways are mainly within the current food system, while more fundamental critiques of the food system are not raised.

Abstract Image

各国粮食系统转型途径的范围和雄心程度有限
2021年联合国粮食系统首脑会议标志着审议全球粮食系统转型的关键时刻。同时,联合国气候变化监测系统进程因所谓的工业捕获和高度象征主义而受到相当多的批评。在此,我们评估首脑会议对国家一级雄心勃勃的政策后续行动的贡献程度。使用自然语言处理工具,我们系统地分析和比较了124个国家食品系统路径文件的内容。我们发现,食品生产主导着这些途径,而食品分配、加工、消费、环境影响、劳动条件和动物福利等问题得到的关注最少。尽管各国面临不同的粮食系统挑战,但这些途径所提出的主题变化有限,与预先确定的全球议程密切相关。我们的研究结果表明,联合国粮食安全系统国家路径的政策方向主要是在当前的粮食系统内,而没有对粮食系统提出更根本的批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信