Truc Ha-Thanh Nguyen , Mahmoud Zakarneh , Matthew McDonald , Joseph Amankwah-Amoah
{"title":"Reconceptualizing ethical leadership for the global south: An institutional logics perspective","authors":"Truc Ha-Thanh Nguyen , Mahmoud Zakarneh , Matthew McDonald , Joseph Amankwah-Amoah","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on ethical leadership from an institutional perspective in countries in the Global North has now been established. However, the topic has garnered less attention in regions of the world with markedly different institutional arrangements that are less stable and less predictable, where leaders face a host of ethical problems. The purpose of this study is to address this imbalance by analyzing ethical leadership in the more fluid environment in the Global South, where it is argued that there is a need to move beyond mainstream intrapsychic perspectives, positivist research designs, and binary orientations that have gained widespread currency in the Global North. To this end, the study problematizes the current ethical leadership literature by drawing on the theory of institutional logics. The theory of institutional logics provides a macro- and micro-level perspective, where the interplay of multiple competing institutions shapes ethical leadership. The analysis aims to clarify and intensify the problems of ethical decision-making in the Global South by offering a set of counterpoints that extend on the mainstream literature. The theoretical and practice-based implications of our analysis are discussed, offering insights for organizations and leaders seeking to navigate the ethical challenges in diverse institutional settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 5","pages":"Article 101897"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984325000360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research on ethical leadership from an institutional perspective in countries in the Global North has now been established. However, the topic has garnered less attention in regions of the world with markedly different institutional arrangements that are less stable and less predictable, where leaders face a host of ethical problems. The purpose of this study is to address this imbalance by analyzing ethical leadership in the more fluid environment in the Global South, where it is argued that there is a need to move beyond mainstream intrapsychic perspectives, positivist research designs, and binary orientations that have gained widespread currency in the Global North. To this end, the study problematizes the current ethical leadership literature by drawing on the theory of institutional logics. The theory of institutional logics provides a macro- and micro-level perspective, where the interplay of multiple competing institutions shapes ethical leadership. The analysis aims to clarify and intensify the problems of ethical decision-making in the Global South by offering a set of counterpoints that extend on the mainstream literature. The theoretical and practice-based implications of our analysis are discussed, offering insights for organizations and leaders seeking to navigate the ethical challenges in diverse institutional settings.
期刊介绍:
The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications.
Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.