Reconceptualizing ethical leadership for the global south: An institutional logics perspective

IF 9.7 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Truc Ha-Thanh Nguyen , Mahmoud Zakarneh , Matthew McDonald , Joseph Amankwah-Amoah
{"title":"Reconceptualizing ethical leadership for the global south: An institutional logics perspective","authors":"Truc Ha-Thanh Nguyen ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Zakarneh ,&nbsp;Matthew McDonald ,&nbsp;Joseph Amankwah-Amoah","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on ethical leadership from an institutional perspective in countries in the Global North has now been established. However, the topic has garnered less attention in regions of the world with markedly different institutional arrangements that are less stable and less predictable, where leaders face a host of ethical problems. The purpose of this study is to address this imbalance by analyzing ethical leadership in the more fluid environment in the Global South, where it is argued that there is a need to move beyond mainstream intrapsychic perspectives, positivist research designs, and binary orientations that have gained widespread currency in the Global North. To this end, the study problematizes the current ethical leadership literature by drawing on the theory of institutional logics. The theory of institutional logics provides a macro- and micro-level perspective, where the interplay of multiple competing institutions shapes ethical leadership. The analysis aims to clarify and intensify the problems of ethical decision-making in the Global South by offering a set of counterpoints that extend on the mainstream literature. The theoretical and practice-based implications of our analysis are discussed, offering insights for organizations and leaders seeking to navigate the ethical challenges in diverse institutional settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"36 5","pages":"Article 101897"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984325000360","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on ethical leadership from an institutional perspective in countries in the Global North has now been established. However, the topic has garnered less attention in regions of the world with markedly different institutional arrangements that are less stable and less predictable, where leaders face a host of ethical problems. The purpose of this study is to address this imbalance by analyzing ethical leadership in the more fluid environment in the Global South, where it is argued that there is a need to move beyond mainstream intrapsychic perspectives, positivist research designs, and binary orientations that have gained widespread currency in the Global North. To this end, the study problematizes the current ethical leadership literature by drawing on the theory of institutional logics. The theory of institutional logics provides a macro- and micro-level perspective, where the interplay of multiple competing institutions shapes ethical leadership. The analysis aims to clarify and intensify the problems of ethical decision-making in the Global South by offering a set of counterpoints that extend on the mainstream literature. The theoretical and practice-based implications of our analysis are discussed, offering insights for organizations and leaders seeking to navigate the ethical challenges in diverse institutional settings.
重新定义全球南方的伦理领导:一个制度逻辑的视角
从制度角度对全球北方国家伦理领导的研究现已建立。然而,在世界上制度安排明显不同的地区,这个话题受到的关注较少,这些地区的制度安排不太稳定,也不太可预测,那里的领导人面临着一系列道德问题。本研究的目的是通过分析全球南方更多变的环境中的道德领导来解决这种不平衡,在那里,有人认为有必要超越主流的内在心理观点、实证主义研究设计和二元取向,这些观点在全球北方得到了广泛的传播。为此,本研究利用制度逻辑的理论,对目前的伦理领导文献提出问题。制度逻辑理论提供了宏观和微观层面的视角,其中多个竞争制度的相互作用形成了伦理领导。该分析旨在通过提供一组延伸到主流文献的对比,澄清和强化全球南方国家的道德决策问题。讨论了我们分析的理论和实践意义,为寻求在不同制度环境中应对道德挑战的组织和领导者提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信