CVI questionnaires for preschool children: Towards early screening of visual difficulties in daily life.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Marinke J Hokken, Christiaan J A Geldof, Sjoerd M Stuit, Ymie J van der Zee, Valeria W Moskalenko, Paola Escudero, Marlou J G Kooiker
{"title":"CVI questionnaires for preschool children: Towards early screening of visual difficulties in daily life.","authors":"Marinke J Hokken, Christiaan J A Geldof, Sjoerd M Stuit, Ymie J van der Zee, Valeria W Moskalenko, Paola Escudero, Marlou J G Kooiker","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2025.2531422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) is associated with a wide range of visual deficits that can be difficult to identify in young children. Parental observations are essential for the early screening and diagnostic assessment of CVI. However, most existing CVI (screening) questionnaires are designed for children aged 6 years and older. This study aimed to (1) explore how CVI manifests in the daily lives of preschool children and (2) develop a preschool CVI screening list. In total, 118 parents of children aged 2-5 years with CVI (<i>n</i> = 30), at risk of CVI (<i>n</i> = 22), and neurotypical children (<i>n</i> = 66) completed two questionnaires: the Parental Questionnaire for Cerebral Visual Impairment (PQCVI) and a new Preschool version of the Visio-CVI-Inventory (V-CVI-I). Parent-reported difficulties were compared across groups at questionnaire, category, and item level. Items were evaluated on three criteria: (1) Discriminability (A' ≥ .75, CVI vs. neurotypical), (2) Relevance (≥ 25% of the CVI-group showing difficulties), (3) Exclusivity (≤10% the neurotypical group showing difficulties). Parents of children with CVI reported significantly more daily visual difficulties, particularly in global and local visual selective attention and visuomotor processing. The Preschool V-CVI-I showed excellent internal consistency (a = .91) and stronger discriminative ability than the PQCVI. Our results indicate that daily visual deficits are already observable in preschool children with CVI and resemble the difficulties previously reported in older children with CVI. A new 10-item Preschool CVI Screening List is proposed to support early recognition and referral for further diagnostics.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2025.2531422","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI) is associated with a wide range of visual deficits that can be difficult to identify in young children. Parental observations are essential for the early screening and diagnostic assessment of CVI. However, most existing CVI (screening) questionnaires are designed for children aged 6 years and older. This study aimed to (1) explore how CVI manifests in the daily lives of preschool children and (2) develop a preschool CVI screening list. In total, 118 parents of children aged 2-5 years with CVI (n = 30), at risk of CVI (n = 22), and neurotypical children (n = 66) completed two questionnaires: the Parental Questionnaire for Cerebral Visual Impairment (PQCVI) and a new Preschool version of the Visio-CVI-Inventory (V-CVI-I). Parent-reported difficulties were compared across groups at questionnaire, category, and item level. Items were evaluated on three criteria: (1) Discriminability (A' ≥ .75, CVI vs. neurotypical), (2) Relevance (≥ 25% of the CVI-group showing difficulties), (3) Exclusivity (≤10% the neurotypical group showing difficulties). Parents of children with CVI reported significantly more daily visual difficulties, particularly in global and local visual selective attention and visuomotor processing. The Preschool V-CVI-I showed excellent internal consistency (a = .91) and stronger discriminative ability than the PQCVI. Our results indicate that daily visual deficits are already observable in preschool children with CVI and resemble the difficulties previously reported in older children with CVI. A new 10-item Preschool CVI Screening List is proposed to support early recognition and referral for further diagnostics.

学龄前儿童CVI问卷:对日常生活中视觉障碍的早期筛查。
脑性视觉障碍(CVI)与幼儿的各种视觉缺陷有关,这些缺陷很难识别。父母的观察对CVI的早期筛查和诊断评估至关重要。然而,大多数现有的CVI(筛选)问卷是为6岁及以上的儿童设计的。本研究旨在(1)探讨CVI在学龄前儿童日常生活中的表现;(2)制定学龄前CVI筛查表。共有118名2-5岁CVI患儿(n = 30)、CVI风险患儿(n = 22)和神经正常儿童(n = 66)的家长完成了两份调查问卷:《家长脑视觉障碍问卷》(PQCVI)和一份新的学前版视觉-CVI-量表(V-CVI-I)。在问卷、类别和项目水平上比较各组间父母报告的困难。项目根据三个标准进行评估:(1)可判别性(CVI组与神经性组的A'≥0.75),(2)相关性(CVI组出现困难的≥25%),(3)排他性(神经性组出现困难的≤10%)。CVI患儿的父母报告了更多的日常视觉困难,特别是在全局和局部视觉选择注意和视觉运动处理方面。学龄前儿童的V-CVI-I具有较好的内部一致性(a = .91)和较强的辨别能力。我们的研究结果表明,在患有CVI的学龄前儿童中已经观察到日常视觉缺陷,并且类似于先前报道的年龄较大的CVI儿童的困难。提出一个新的10项学龄前CVI筛查表,以支持早期识别和进一步诊断转诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology: Child
Applied Neuropsychology: Child CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信