Does hearing “and” help children understand “or”? Insights into scales and relevance from the acquisition of disjunction in child Romanian

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Adina Camelia Bleotu, Mara Panaitescu, Gabriela Bîlbîie, Alexandre Cremers, Andreea Cristina Nicolae, Anton Benz, Lyn Tieu
{"title":"Does hearing “and” help children understand “or”? Insights into scales and relevance from the acquisition of disjunction in child Romanian","authors":"Adina Camelia Bleotu, Mara Panaitescu, Gabriela Bîlbîie, Alexandre Cremers, Andreea Cristina Nicolae, Anton Benz, Lyn Tieu","doi":"10.1017/s0305000925100068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Children are known to derive more implicatures when the required alternative is made salient through contrast or when it is made contextually relevant through a story or a Question Under Discussion. We investigated the exclusivity implicature of three disjunctions (<span>sau</span> “or”, <span>sau… sau</span>, and <span>fie…fie</span> “either…or”) in child Romanian, an understudied language in the previous literature. Three experiments reveal that the mere presence of the stronger alternative, that is, simply hearing unrelated conjunctive statements in the course of the experiment, is not enough to boost implicatures. Rather, implicatures increase as a result of both access to alternatives and contextual relevance (expressed through conjunctive questions such as <span>Did the hen push the train and the boat?</span>). Interestingly, the boost in implicatures was observed only for <span>sau</span>-based disjunctions, not for <span>fie…fie</span>, which we conjecture may be due to children treating the latter as ambiguous between disjunction and conjunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":48132,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Language","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000925100068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children are known to derive more implicatures when the required alternative is made salient through contrast or when it is made contextually relevant through a story or a Question Under Discussion. We investigated the exclusivity implicature of three disjunctions (sau “or”, sau… sau, and fie…fie “either…or”) in child Romanian, an understudied language in the previous literature. Three experiments reveal that the mere presence of the stronger alternative, that is, simply hearing unrelated conjunctive statements in the course of the experiment, is not enough to boost implicatures. Rather, implicatures increase as a result of both access to alternatives and contextual relevance (expressed through conjunctive questions such as Did the hen push the train and the boat?). Interestingly, the boost in implicatures was observed only for sau-based disjunctions, not for fie…fie, which we conjecture may be due to children treating the latter as ambiguous between disjunction and conjunction.

“听”和“能帮助孩子理解”或“?”儿童罗马尼亚语分离习得的尺度与相关性研究
众所周知,当需要的选择通过对比变得突出时,或者当它通过故事或讨论中的问题与上下文相关时,儿童会得出更多的含义。我们调查了儿童罗马尼亚语中三个析取词(sau " or “, sau…sau和fie…fie ” either…or ")的排他性含义,这是一种先前文献中研究不足的语言。三个实验表明,仅仅存在更强的选择,即在实验过程中简单地听到不相关的连词陈述,并不足以提高含义。相反,含义的增加是由于对替代方案和上下文相关性的访问(通过连词问题,如母鸡推火车和船了吗?)有趣的是,仅在基于“saud”的断续词中观察到含义的增加,而在“fie…fie”中则没有,我们推测这可能是由于儿童将后者视为断续和连接之间的模糊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A key publication in the field, Journal of Child Language publishes articles on all aspects of the scientific study of language behaviour in children, the principles which underlie it, and the theories which may account for it. The international range of authors and breadth of coverage allow the journal to forge links between many different areas of research including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science and anthropology. This interdisciplinary approach spans a wide range of interests: phonology, phonetics, morphology, syntax, vocabulary, semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, or any other recognised facet of language study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信