Anger superiority effect or happiness superiority effect: how the distractor homogeneity modulates the asymmetry in searching emotional faces?

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Xiaofan Jiang, Shenli Peng, Zhan Xu
{"title":"Anger superiority effect or happiness superiority effect: how the distractor homogeneity modulates the asymmetry in searching emotional faces?","authors":"Xiaofan Jiang, Shenli Peng, Zhan Xu","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2516661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous studies have examined the search asymmetry between angry and happy faces, contrasting the Anger Superiority Effect (ASE) and Happiness Superiority Effect (HSE). Building on this work, the current study investigates how distractor homogeneity modulates these emotional search asymmetries. Using behavioral and eye-tracking measures, we analyze both \"target guidance\" and \"distractor rejection\" mechanisms to provide a nuanced understanding of attentional allocation during emotional face detection. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants completed identical visual search tasks. Both experiments yielded consistent results: ASE emerged under homogeneous backgrounds, while HSE appeared under heterogeneous conditions. Experiment 2 further employed regression analysis on eye-tracking metrics and reaction times, revealing two key findings: (a) In homogeneous searches, angry faces showed stronger attentional guidance, indicating their detection advantage during feature-based processing; (b) In heterogeneous searches, happy face detection benefited from more efficient distractor rejection during conjunction-based processing. These results demonstrate that distractor homogeneity dynamically influences emotional search asymmetries by engaging distinct attentional strategies. The study advances theoretical frameworks of emotion and attention by highlighting condition-dependent mechanisms underlying ASE and HSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2516661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined the search asymmetry between angry and happy faces, contrasting the Anger Superiority Effect (ASE) and Happiness Superiority Effect (HSE). Building on this work, the current study investigates how distractor homogeneity modulates these emotional search asymmetries. Using behavioral and eye-tracking measures, we analyze both "target guidance" and "distractor rejection" mechanisms to provide a nuanced understanding of attentional allocation during emotional face detection. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants completed identical visual search tasks. Both experiments yielded consistent results: ASE emerged under homogeneous backgrounds, while HSE appeared under heterogeneous conditions. Experiment 2 further employed regression analysis on eye-tracking metrics and reaction times, revealing two key findings: (a) In homogeneous searches, angry faces showed stronger attentional guidance, indicating their detection advantage during feature-based processing; (b) In heterogeneous searches, happy face detection benefited from more efficient distractor rejection during conjunction-based processing. These results demonstrate that distractor homogeneity dynamically influences emotional search asymmetries by engaging distinct attentional strategies. The study advances theoretical frameworks of emotion and attention by highlighting condition-dependent mechanisms underlying ASE and HSE.

愤怒优势效应或快乐优势效应:干扰物同质性如何调节寻找情绪面孔的不对称性?
许多研究检验了愤怒和快乐面孔之间的搜索不对称,对比了愤怒优势效应(ASE)和快乐优势效应(HSE)。在这项工作的基础上,当前的研究探讨了干扰物同质性如何调节这些情绪搜索的不对称性。利用行为和眼动追踪方法,我们分析了“目标引导”和“干扰物拒绝”机制,以提供对情绪面部检测过程中注意力分配的细致理解。在实验1和2中,参与者完成了相同的视觉搜索任务。两个实验都得到了一致的结果:ASE出现在同质背景下,而HSE出现在异质条件下。实验2进一步对眼动追踪指标和反应时间进行回归分析,得到两个重要发现:(a)在同质搜索中,愤怒面孔表现出更强的注意引导,表明愤怒面孔在特征处理过程中具有检测优势;(b)在异质搜索中,快乐面孔检测得益于基于连接的处理过程中更有效的干扰物拒绝。这些结果表明,干扰物同质性通过不同的注意策略动态地影响情绪搜索的不对称性。该研究通过强调ASE和HSE背后的条件依赖机制,推进了情绪和注意力的理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信