Intergenerational Solidarity With Older Parents and Self-Esteem of Middle-Aged Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The United States and South Korea Comparison

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-07-17 DOI:10.1111/famp.70056
Woosang Hwang, Maria T. Brown, Merril Silverstein
{"title":"Intergenerational Solidarity With Older Parents and Self-Esteem of Middle-Aged Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The United States and South Korea Comparison","authors":"Woosang Hwang,&nbsp;Maria T. Brown,&nbsp;Merril Silverstein","doi":"10.1111/famp.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Intergenerational social support has been considered an important factor in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. However, prior research has overlooked the connection between intergenerational solidarity—social cohesion between generations—and self-esteem across Western and Asian families during the pandemic. We aimed to discover common unobserved latent classes of intergenerational solidarity with older parents among middle-aged adults during the pandemic in the United States and South Korea. In addition, we sought to determine if the identified solidarity latent classes were linked to the self-esteem of middle-aged adults, and whether the above association varies according to parents' gender or cultural contexts. We used data from the 2022 surveys of the Longitudinal Study of Generations and Korean Generation Study, and conducted multigroup latent class analysis for 247 child–mother and 205 child-father groups in the United States and 229 child–mother and 155 child-father groups in South Korea. In addition, multivariate regression analysis based on the three-step approach was conducted. We identified the same three intergenerational solidarity latent classes in the four groups: <i>tight-knit</i>, <i>intimate-but-distant</i>, and <i>detached</i>. Furthermore, we found that middle-aged adults with a <i>tight-knit</i> relationship with older parents reported higher self-esteem than those who had <i>intimate-but-distant</i> and <i>detached</i> types of relationships with older parents, irrespective of parents' gender and national context. Our results suggest that fostering stronger intergenerational relationships would be beneficial for middle-aged adults in both cultures, regardless of the gender of their parents. We provide insight to clarify the understanding of the role of intergenerational solidarity in midlife in American and Korean cultural contexts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intergenerational social support has been considered an important factor in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. However, prior research has overlooked the connection between intergenerational solidarity—social cohesion between generations—and self-esteem across Western and Asian families during the pandemic. We aimed to discover common unobserved latent classes of intergenerational solidarity with older parents among middle-aged adults during the pandemic in the United States and South Korea. In addition, we sought to determine if the identified solidarity latent classes were linked to the self-esteem of middle-aged adults, and whether the above association varies according to parents' gender or cultural contexts. We used data from the 2022 surveys of the Longitudinal Study of Generations and Korean Generation Study, and conducted multigroup latent class analysis for 247 child–mother and 205 child-father groups in the United States and 229 child–mother and 155 child-father groups in South Korea. In addition, multivariate regression analysis based on the three-step approach was conducted. We identified the same three intergenerational solidarity latent classes in the four groups: tight-knit, intimate-but-distant, and detached. Furthermore, we found that middle-aged adults with a tight-knit relationship with older parents reported higher self-esteem than those who had intimate-but-distant and detached types of relationships with older parents, irrespective of parents' gender and national context. Our results suggest that fostering stronger intergenerational relationships would be beneficial for middle-aged adults in both cultures, regardless of the gender of their parents. We provide insight to clarify the understanding of the role of intergenerational solidarity in midlife in American and Korean cultural contexts.

COVID-19大流行期间与老年父母的代际团结和中年儿童的自尊:美国和韩国的比较
代际社会支持被认为是克服新冠疫情危机的重要因素。然而,之前的研究忽视了大流行期间西方和亚洲家庭的代际团结(代际社会凝聚力)和自尊之间的联系。我们的目的是发现在美国和韩国的大流行期间,中年人与年长父母的代际团结的共同未被观察到的潜在阶层。此外,我们试图确定所确定的团结潜在阶层是否与中年人的自尊有关,以及上述联系是否因父母的性别或文化背景而异。我们使用了《代际纵向研究》和《韩国代际研究》的2022年调查数据,并对美国的247个儿童母亲和205个儿童父亲群体以及韩国的229个儿童母亲和155个儿童父亲群体进行了多组潜在类别分析。此外,基于三步法进行了多元回归分析。我们在四个群体中发现了同样的三个代际团结潜在阶层:紧密联系,亲密但疏远,和疏远。此外,我们发现,无论父母的性别和国家背景如何,与年长父母关系密切的中年人比那些与年长父母关系亲密但疏远和疏远的中年人自尊更高。我们的研究结果表明,无论父母的性别如何,培养更强的代际关系对两种文化中的中年人都是有益的。我们提供的见解,以澄清在美国和韩国文化背景下的中年代际团结的作用的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信