Toward Enhanced Quality Assessment in Software Engineering MOOCs

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jorge Marques Prates;Carlos Alario-Hoyos;José Carlos Maldonado
{"title":"Toward Enhanced Quality Assessment in Software Engineering MOOCs","authors":"Jorge Marques Prates;Carlos Alario-Hoyos;José Carlos Maldonado","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2025.3586806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are digital courses that offer open learning content, reaching a broad audience of students. In the realm of Software Engineering Education, MOOCs can be integrated with methodologies like flipped classrooms and blended learning. However, effectively evaluating the use of MOOCs poses a challenge due to the absence of defined metrics for assessing their quality. In this context, this study aims to scrutinize the quality of MOOCs, specifically focusing on Software Engineering. The research questions investigate several aspects through a Systematic Mapping Mapping, including the quality criteria for MOOC evaluation, specific characteristics relevant to Software Engineering education, the application of quality models, the relationship between standardized concepts in MOOCs and their quality, and the benefits of quality assessments conducted by accreditation agencies. The research endeavors to offer a comprehensive insight into quality assessment within the MOOC landscape, with a particular emphasis on Software Engineering Education. The results encompass the identification of quality criteria for evaluating MOOCs in the field of Software Engineering, as well as a deeper understanding of the particular characteristics that impact the quality of these courses.","PeriodicalId":38963,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","volume":"20 ","pages":"172-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11072415/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are digital courses that offer open learning content, reaching a broad audience of students. In the realm of Software Engineering Education, MOOCs can be integrated with methodologies like flipped classrooms and blended learning. However, effectively evaluating the use of MOOCs poses a challenge due to the absence of defined metrics for assessing their quality. In this context, this study aims to scrutinize the quality of MOOCs, specifically focusing on Software Engineering. The research questions investigate several aspects through a Systematic Mapping Mapping, including the quality criteria for MOOC evaluation, specific characteristics relevant to Software Engineering education, the application of quality models, the relationship between standardized concepts in MOOCs and their quality, and the benefits of quality assessments conducted by accreditation agencies. The research endeavors to offer a comprehensive insight into quality assessment within the MOOC landscape, with a particular emphasis on Software Engineering Education. The results encompass the identification of quality criteria for evaluating MOOCs in the field of Software Engineering, as well as a deeper understanding of the particular characteristics that impact the quality of these courses.
加强软件工程mooc课程质量评估
大规模开放在线课程(MOOCs)是提供开放学习内容的数字课程,面向广大学生。在软件工程教育领域,mooc可以与翻转课堂和混合式学习等方法相结合。然而,由于缺乏评估mooc质量的明确指标,有效评估mooc的使用构成了挑战。在此背景下,本研究旨在审视mooc的质量,特别是关注软件工程。本研究问题通过系统测绘的方式考察了MOOC评价的质量标准、软件工程教育的具体特征、质量模型的应用、MOOC标准化概念与质量的关系、认证机构进行质量评估的效益等几个方面。该研究努力提供对MOOC环境中质量评估的全面见解,特别强调软件工程教育。研究结果包括确定评估软件工程领域mooc的质量标准,以及对影响这些课程质量的特定特征的更深入理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信