Measurement properties of disease activity instruments in peripheral spondyloarthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the CRESPA trial.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Clementina López-Medina, Dafne Capelusnik, Casper Webers, Filip Van den Bosch, Annelies Boonen, Philippe Carron, Anna Molto, Sofia Ramiro
{"title":"Measurement properties of disease activity instruments in peripheral spondyloarthritis: a post-hoc analysis of the CRESPA trial.","authors":"Clementina López-Medina, Dafne Capelusnik, Casper Webers, Filip Van den Bosch, Annelies Boonen, Philippe Carron, Anna Molto, Sofia Ramiro","doi":"10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unravelling the performance of disease activity measures in peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) is crucial for the development of clinical studies. We aimed to evaluate the construct validity and discriminatory capacity of various instruments assessing disease activity and response criteria in patients with pSpA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Post-hoc analysis of the CRESPA randomised controlled trial including patients with early active pSpA. Patients were randomised to golimumab (GOL) or placebo (PBO). Data of the placebo-controlled part until week 12 were used. Construct validity (known group discrimination assessed with standardised mean difference, SMD) in the 12-week data, longitudinal construct validity (ie, standardised response mean and effect size) and trial discrimination (SMD) of several disease activity instruments were assessed. As part of trial discrimination, a χ<sup>2</sup> test was performed for binary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients (40 GOL, 20 PBO) were included. Construct validity was better for composite outcomes (ie, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-higher SMD between active and inactive patients). Longitudinal construct validity was consistently good for composite outcomes (eg, ASDAS, DAPSA) and global assessments (Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)). Clinical trial discrimination was good for composites (BASDAI, ASDAS, DAPSA), global assessments (PGA, PhGA) and joint counts (swollen joint count (SJC66) and tender joint count (TJC68)).Among binary outcomes, trial discrimination was strongest for clinical remission (ie, absence of arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis), BASDAI50, DAPSA-Low Disease Activity (LDA) and ASDAS-LDA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While both composite and global outcome measurement instruments performed well in pSpA, composite scores like DAPSA, ASDAS and BASDAI showed better construct validity. The clinical remission definition was the most discriminatory response criterion.</p>","PeriodicalId":21396,"journal":{"name":"RMD Open","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12265824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RMD Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unravelling the performance of disease activity measures in peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) is crucial for the development of clinical studies. We aimed to evaluate the construct validity and discriminatory capacity of various instruments assessing disease activity and response criteria in patients with pSpA.

Methods: Post-hoc analysis of the CRESPA randomised controlled trial including patients with early active pSpA. Patients were randomised to golimumab (GOL) or placebo (PBO). Data of the placebo-controlled part until week 12 were used. Construct validity (known group discrimination assessed with standardised mean difference, SMD) in the 12-week data, longitudinal construct validity (ie, standardised response mean and effect size) and trial discrimination (SMD) of several disease activity instruments were assessed. As part of trial discrimination, a χ2 test was performed for binary outcomes.

Results: A total of 60 patients (40 GOL, 20 PBO) were included. Construct validity was better for composite outcomes (ie, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-higher SMD between active and inactive patients). Longitudinal construct validity was consistently good for composite outcomes (eg, ASDAS, DAPSA) and global assessments (Patient Global Assessment (PGA), Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)). Clinical trial discrimination was good for composites (BASDAI, ASDAS, DAPSA), global assessments (PGA, PhGA) and joint counts (swollen joint count (SJC66) and tender joint count (TJC68)).Among binary outcomes, trial discrimination was strongest for clinical remission (ie, absence of arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis), BASDAI50, DAPSA-Low Disease Activity (LDA) and ASDAS-LDA.

Conclusion: While both composite and global outcome measurement instruments performed well in pSpA, composite scores like DAPSA, ASDAS and BASDAI showed better construct validity. The clinical remission definition was the most discriminatory response criterion.

外周性脊柱炎疾病活动度仪器的测量特性:CRESPA试验的事后分析
背景:揭示外周性脊柱炎(pSpA)疾病活动性指标的表现对临床研究的发展至关重要。我们的目的是评估各种评估pSpA患者疾病活动性和反应标准的工具的结构效度和区分能力。方法:对包括早期活动性pSpA患者的CRESPA随机对照试验进行事后分析。患者被随机分配到golimumab (GOL)或安慰剂(PBO)组。使用安慰剂对照部分直到第12周的数据。对12周数据的构念效度(用标准化平均差(SMD)评估已知组判别)、若干疾病活动工具的纵向构念效度(即标准化反应均值和效应大小)和试验判别度(SMD)进行评估。作为试验区分的一部分,对二元结果进行χ2检验。结果:共纳入60例患者(GOL 40例,PBO 20例)。综合结果(即银屑病关节炎疾病活动性(DAPSA),浴强直性脊柱炎疾病活动性指数(BASDAI)和轴性脊柱炎疾病活动性评分(ASDAS)-活跃和不活跃患者之间的SMD较高)的结构效度更好。综合结果(如ASDAS、DAPSA)和整体评估(患者整体评估(PGA)、医生整体评估(PhGA))的纵向结构效度一致较好。临床试验对复合材料(BASDAI、ASDAS、DAPSA)、整体评估(PGA、PhGA)和关节计数(肿胀关节计数(SJC66)和压痛关节计数(TJC68))的区分良好。在二元结局中,临床缓解(即无关节炎、鼻炎和趾炎)、BASDAI50、dapsa -低疾病活动性(LDA)和ASDAS-LDA的试验歧视最强。结论:综合量表和综合量表在pSpA中均表现良好,而综合量表如DAPSA、ASDAS和BASDAI具有更好的结构效度。临床缓解定义是最具歧视性的反应标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RMD Open
RMD Open RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.50%
发文量
205
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: RMD Open publishes high quality peer-reviewed original research covering the full spectrum of musculoskeletal disorders, rheumatism and connective tissue diseases, including osteoporosis, spine and rehabilitation. Clinical and epidemiological research, basic and translational medicine, interesting clinical cases, and smaller studies that add to the literature are all considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信