The relationship between work addiction and addictions to social media, shopping, food, caffeine, and nicotine.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Australian Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00049530.2025.2486774
Emrah Özsoy, Mark D Griffiths, Gülay Tınmaz Karaçay, Ömer Alperen Onay, Canan Yılmaz, Özlem Balaban
{"title":"The relationship between work addiction and addictions to social media, shopping, food, caffeine, and nicotine.","authors":"Emrah Özsoy, Mark D Griffiths, Gülay Tınmaz Karaçay, Ömer Alperen Onay, Canan Yılmaz, Özlem Balaban","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2025.2486774","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Work addiction is a relatively underexplored behaviour compared to other forms of addiction. Existing research predominantly focuses on the antecedents and consequences of work addiction. However, studies examining its relationship with other types of addiction are notably limited. Therefore the present study investigated the relationships between work addiction and five other types of addiction (i.e. social media addiction, shopping addiction, food addiction, caffeine addiction, and nicotine addiction).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The research was conducted with 693 employees working in both public and private sectors. Data were collected through an online survey comprising validated scales for assessing the specific types of addiction and demographic questions. Descriptive statistics, internal consistency tests and Pearson correlation analysis were employed for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlation analysis showed significant (albeit weak) positive relationships between work addiction and food addiction (<i>r</i> = .14), shopping addiction (<i>r</i> = .12), and caffeine addiction (<i>r</i> = .16). However, no significant relationships were found between work addiction and social media addiction or nicotine addiction. Comorbidity among individuals classified as high-risk for more than one addiction was only observed between two substance-based addictions (caffeine and nicotine), and between one substance-based addiction (caffeine) and one behavioural addiction (social media).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that although multiple behavioural addictions may be associated, the observed comorbidity patterns primarily occur between two substance-based addictions or between a substance-based and a behavioural addiction, rather than between two behavioural addictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":"77 1","pages":"2486774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2025.2486774","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Work addiction is a relatively underexplored behaviour compared to other forms of addiction. Existing research predominantly focuses on the antecedents and consequences of work addiction. However, studies examining its relationship with other types of addiction are notably limited. Therefore the present study investigated the relationships between work addiction and five other types of addiction (i.e. social media addiction, shopping addiction, food addiction, caffeine addiction, and nicotine addiction).

Method: The research was conducted with 693 employees working in both public and private sectors. Data were collected through an online survey comprising validated scales for assessing the specific types of addiction and demographic questions. Descriptive statistics, internal consistency tests and Pearson correlation analysis were employed for data analysis.

Results: Correlation analysis showed significant (albeit weak) positive relationships between work addiction and food addiction (r = .14), shopping addiction (r = .12), and caffeine addiction (r = .16). However, no significant relationships were found between work addiction and social media addiction or nicotine addiction. Comorbidity among individuals classified as high-risk for more than one addiction was only observed between two substance-based addictions (caffeine and nicotine), and between one substance-based addiction (caffeine) and one behavioural addiction (social media).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that although multiple behavioural addictions may be associated, the observed comorbidity patterns primarily occur between two substance-based addictions or between a substance-based and a behavioural addiction, rather than between two behavioural addictions.

工作成瘾与社交媒体、购物、食物、咖啡因和尼古丁成瘾之间的关系。
目的:与其他形式的成瘾相比,工作成瘾是一种相对未被充分研究的行为。现有的研究主要集中在工作成瘾的前因和后果上。然而,研究其与其他类型成瘾的关系的研究明显有限。因此,本研究调查了工作成瘾与其他五种成瘾(即社交媒体成瘾、购物成瘾、食物成瘾、咖啡因成瘾和尼古丁成瘾)之间的关系。方法:对693名在公共和私营部门工作的员工进行调查。数据是通过在线调查收集的,包括评估特定类型成瘾和人口统计问题的有效量表。采用描述性统计、内部一致性检验和Pearson相关分析进行数据分析。结果:相关分析显示,工作成瘾与食物成瘾(r = 0.14)、购物成瘾(r = 0.12)和咖啡因成瘾(r = 0.16)之间存在显著(尽管微弱)的正相关关系。然而,工作成瘾与社交媒体成瘾或尼古丁成瘾之间没有明显的关系。仅在两种基于物质的成瘾(咖啡因和尼古丁)以及一种基于物质的成瘾(咖啡因)和一种行为成瘾(社交媒体)之间观察到被归类为一种以上成瘾的高风险个体的共病性。结论:这些发现表明,尽管多种行为成瘾可能存在关联,但观察到的共病模式主要发生在两种物质成瘾之间或一种物质成瘾和一种行为成瘾之间,而不是两种行为成瘾之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信