Aerobic Cycling Exercise Training Does Not Improve Impaired Vagal Reactivation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Jeann L Sabino-Carvalho,Sabrina Li,Elsa Mekonnen,Kevin Mammino,Joe R Nocera,Jeanie Park
{"title":"Aerobic Cycling Exercise Training Does Not Improve Impaired Vagal Reactivation in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Jeann L Sabino-Carvalho,Sabrina Li,Elsa Mekonnen,Kevin Mammino,Joe R Nocera,Jeanie Park","doi":"10.1249/mss.0000000000003824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nParasympathetic reactivation is essential for the rapid decrease in heart rate following exercise and delayed heart rate recovery (HRR) post-exercise is linked to poor clinical outcomes. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with autonomic dysfunction including reduced parasympathetic activity. Exercise training may improve parasympathetic reactivation. Therefore, this study aimed to test whether CKD patients experience delayed HRR due to impaired vagal reactivation and if 12 weeks of aerobic exercise can improve HRR.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nTwenty-seven CKD patients (stages III and IV, eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73m2) and 18 age-matched controls underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). HRR was assessed through heart rate decay (HRR60s) and heart rate variability (HRV) during the first 60 seconds of recovery. Recovery kinetics were modeled to calculate the time constant (τ). CKD patients were then randomly assigned to aerobic exercise or non-aerobic stretching interventions for 12 weeks (3 days per week) and CPET was repeated post-intervention.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nCKD patients exhibited significantly blunted HRR60s (ΔHRR60s: -11 ± 4 bpm vs. -17 ± 6 bpm, P = 0.001) and a longer recovery time constant (τ: 142 ± 33 vs. 116 ± 21 s, P = 0.004) compared to controls. HRV indices increased less post-exercise in CKD patients compared to controls (ΔRMSSD: 0.3 ± 1 ms vs. 1.6 ± 1 ms, P = 0.001). 12 weeks of aerobic exercise did not improve HRR60s (ΔHRR60s: pre -12 ± 4 bpm vs. post -12 ± 7 bpm, P = 0.971) or HRV indices (all P > 0.108).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nCKD patients have decreased HRR post-exercise due to impaired cardiac vagal reactivation. 12 weeks of aerobic exercise training did not improve cardiac vagal reactivation. Future studies should explore different exercise modalities and manipulate training variables such as intensity, volume and frequency to assess their potential impact on cardiac vagal reactivation in patients with CKD.","PeriodicalId":18500,"journal":{"name":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000003824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Parasympathetic reactivation is essential for the rapid decrease in heart rate following exercise and delayed heart rate recovery (HRR) post-exercise is linked to poor clinical outcomes. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with autonomic dysfunction including reduced parasympathetic activity. Exercise training may improve parasympathetic reactivation. Therefore, this study aimed to test whether CKD patients experience delayed HRR due to impaired vagal reactivation and if 12 weeks of aerobic exercise can improve HRR. METHODS Twenty-seven CKD patients (stages III and IV, eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73m2) and 18 age-matched controls underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). HRR was assessed through heart rate decay (HRR60s) and heart rate variability (HRV) during the first 60 seconds of recovery. Recovery kinetics were modeled to calculate the time constant (τ). CKD patients were then randomly assigned to aerobic exercise or non-aerobic stretching interventions for 12 weeks (3 days per week) and CPET was repeated post-intervention. RESULTS CKD patients exhibited significantly blunted HRR60s (ΔHRR60s: -11 ± 4 bpm vs. -17 ± 6 bpm, P = 0.001) and a longer recovery time constant (τ: 142 ± 33 vs. 116 ± 21 s, P = 0.004) compared to controls. HRV indices increased less post-exercise in CKD patients compared to controls (ΔRMSSD: 0.3 ± 1 ms vs. 1.6 ± 1 ms, P = 0.001). 12 weeks of aerobic exercise did not improve HRR60s (ΔHRR60s: pre -12 ± 4 bpm vs. post -12 ± 7 bpm, P = 0.971) or HRV indices (all P > 0.108). CONCLUSIONS CKD patients have decreased HRR post-exercise due to impaired cardiac vagal reactivation. 12 weeks of aerobic exercise training did not improve cardiac vagal reactivation. Future studies should explore different exercise modalities and manipulate training variables such as intensity, volume and frequency to assess their potential impact on cardiac vagal reactivation in patients with CKD.
有氧自行车运动训练不能改善慢性肾病患者迷走神经再激活受损
目的:交感神经再激活对于运动后心率的快速下降至关重要,而运动后心率恢复(HRR)延迟与不良临床结果有关。慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)与自主神经功能障碍相关,包括副交感神经活动减少。运动训练可以改善副交感神经的再激活。因此,本研究旨在测试CKD患者是否因迷走神经再激活受损而出现HRR延迟,以及12周的有氧运动是否可以改善HRR。方法对27例CKD患者(III期和IV期,eGFR 15-59 mL/min/1.73m2)和18例年龄匹配的对照组进行心肺运动试验(CPET)。HRR通过心率衰减(HRR60s)和心率变异性(HRV)在恢复后的前60秒进行评估。建立恢复动力学模型以计算时间常数(τ)。CKD患者随后被随机分配到有氧运动或非有氧拉伸干预组,为期12周(每周3天),干预后重复CPET。结果与对照组相比,sckd患者HRR60s明显减弱(ΔHRR60s: -11±4 bpm vs -17±6 bpm, P = 0.001),恢复时间常数更长(τ: 142±33 vs 116±21 s, P = 0.004)。与对照组相比,CKD患者运动后HRV指数增加较少(ΔRMSSD: 0.3±1 ms vs. 1.6±1 ms, P = 0.001)。12周的有氧运动没有改善HRR60s (ΔHRR60s: -12±4 bpm前vs. -12±7 bpm后,P = 0.971)或HRV指数(P均为0.108)。结论sckd患者运动后HRR降低是由于心脏迷走神经再激活受损。12周的有氧运动训练没有改善心脏迷走神经再激活。未来的研究应该探索不同的运动方式和操纵训练变量,如强度、体积和频率,以评估它们对CKD患者心脏迷走神经再激活的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信