Efficacy of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI:10.1159/000547416
Bahram Bodaghi, Sarah Touhami, Yoo-Ri Chung, Eunzee Lee, Hanju Kim
{"title":"Efficacy of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bahram Bodaghi, Sarah Touhami, Yoo-Ri Chung, Eunzee Lee, Hanju Kim","doi":"10.1159/000547416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We investigated the effects of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on treating posterior segment complications other than macular edema in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated with vitrectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched on October 2, 2023. Studies comparing patients with PDR who were treated with ILM peeling to those who did not undergo ILM peeling were included. The primary outcome was the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes were final central retinal thickness (CRT) and formation of the postoperative epiretinal membrane (ERM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The postoperative BCVA at 6 months was better in those who underwent ILM peeling (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.51 to -0.15) than in those did not, whereas the final BCVA was not significantly different between the groups (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.00). The final CRT was significantly thin (95% CI: -61.82 to -35.63), with a low occurrence of postoperative ERM in the ILM peeling group (95% CI: 0.12-0.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ILM peeling effectively prevented postoperative ERM formation in patients with PDR complications; however, the benefit for postoperative vision was not evident after 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We investigated the effects of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on treating posterior segment complications other than macular edema in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated with vitrectomy.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched on October 2, 2023. Studies comparing patients with PDR who were treated with ILM peeling to those who did not undergo ILM peeling were included. The primary outcome was the final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary outcomes were final central retinal thickness (CRT) and formation of the postoperative epiretinal membrane (ERM).

Results: Eleven comparative studies were included in this meta-analysis. The postoperative BCVA at 6 months was better in those who underwent ILM peeling (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.51 to -0.15) than in those did not, whereas the final BCVA was not significantly different between the groups (95% CI: -0.30 to 0.00). The final CRT was significantly thin (95% CI: -61.82 to -35.63), with a low occurrence of postoperative ERM in the ILM peeling group (95% CI: 0.12-0.26).

Conclusion: ILM peeling effectively prevented postoperative ERM formation in patients with PDR complications; however, the benefit for postoperative vision was not evident after 6 months.

增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变眼内限制性膜剥离的疗效:荟萃分析。
简介:我们研究了玻璃体切除术治疗增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(PDR)后段并发症(除黄斑水肿外)的内限制膜(ILM)剥离的效果。方法:于2023年10月2日检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library等数据库。研究包括比较接受ILM剥离治疗的PDR患者和未接受ILM剥离治疗的PDR患者。主要结果为最终最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。次要结果是最终视网膜中央厚度(CRT)和术后视网膜前膜(ERM)的形成。结果:11项比较研究纳入本荟萃分析。6个月时,接受ILM剥离的患者BCVA(95%可信区间(CI): -0.24至-0.07)优于未接受ILM剥离的患者,而两组之间的最终BCVA无显著差异(95% CI: -0.27至0.04)。最终CRT显着变薄(95% CI: -69.92至-29.01),ILM剥离组术后ERM发生率低(95% CI: 0.12至0.26)。结论:ILM剥离可有效预防PDR并发症患者术后ERM形成;然而,6个月后,术后视力的改善并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信