Pediatric Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature to Inform Work-Up and Management.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Laurel Gray, Annika M Hansen, Sarah D Cipriano
{"title":"Pediatric Staphylococcal Scalded Skin Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature to Inform Work-Up and Management.","authors":"Laurel Gray, Annika M Hansen, Sarah D Cipriano","doi":"10.1111/pde.16029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Significant gaps exist in the literature regarding the work-up and management of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS). These include (a) the utility of ancillary testing in improving diagnostic accuracy and informing patient care, and (b) appropriate management strategies for antibiotics, fluids, and skin care. Moreover, no systematic review to date has focused on non-neonatal pediatric SSSS to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of PubMed and OVID was conducted from 2010 to 2024 using the medical subject heading (MeSH) term 'staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome' with restriction to MeSH major topic. Studies involving neonates (< 90 days old) and premature infants (< 37 weeks' gestation) were excluded. Articles were limited to English-language studies involving human subjects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 studies were analyzed. Laboratory evaluations, including blood counts, chemistry panels, and inflammatory markers, were found to be non-specific and did not enhance diagnostic accuracy or inform patient care. Aerobic bacterial cultures from suspected infection foci were more likely to yield positive results, while blood cultures were typically sterile. Findings suggest that clindamycin does not improve outcomes in SSSS, supporting beta-lactam antibiotics as a preferred first-line treatment. Fluid resuscitation was necessary for children unable to maintain oral intake, and bland emollients were effective for skin care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings support a \"less is more\" approach to both the work-up and management of SSSS, emphasizing minimal laboratory testing, targeted antibiotic use, and supportive skin care. Future research should focus on prospective studies implementing these strategies and evaluating outcomes to refine care further.</p>","PeriodicalId":19819,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.16029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Significant gaps exist in the literature regarding the work-up and management of staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS). These include (a) the utility of ancillary testing in improving diagnostic accuracy and informing patient care, and (b) appropriate management strategies for antibiotics, fluids, and skin care. Moreover, no systematic review to date has focused on non-neonatal pediatric SSSS to provide a comprehensive analysis of the literature.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed and OVID was conducted from 2010 to 2024 using the medical subject heading (MeSH) term 'staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome' with restriction to MeSH major topic. Studies involving neonates (< 90 days old) and premature infants (< 37 weeks' gestation) were excluded. Articles were limited to English-language studies involving human subjects.

Results: A total of 48 studies were analyzed. Laboratory evaluations, including blood counts, chemistry panels, and inflammatory markers, were found to be non-specific and did not enhance diagnostic accuracy or inform patient care. Aerobic bacterial cultures from suspected infection foci were more likely to yield positive results, while blood cultures were typically sterile. Findings suggest that clindamycin does not improve outcomes in SSSS, supporting beta-lactam antibiotics as a preferred first-line treatment. Fluid resuscitation was necessary for children unable to maintain oral intake, and bland emollients were effective for skin care.

Conclusion: The findings support a "less is more" approach to both the work-up and management of SSSS, emphasizing minimal laboratory testing, targeted antibiotic use, and supportive skin care. Future research should focus on prospective studies implementing these strategies and evaluating outcomes to refine care further.

儿童葡萄球菌性烫伤皮肤综合征:一项系统的文献综述,以告知工作和管理。
背景:关于葡萄球菌性烫伤皮肤综合征(SSSS)的检查和治疗,文献中存在显著的空白。这些包括(a)辅助检测在提高诊断准确性和告知患者护理方面的效用,以及(b)抗生素、液体和皮肤护理的适当管理策略。此外,迄今为止还没有针对非新生儿儿童SSSS的系统综述提供全面的文献分析。方法:以医学主题词“葡萄球菌性烫伤皮肤综合征”(MeSH)为主题词,对2010 - 2024年PubMed和OVID进行系统回顾。涉及新生儿的研究(结果:共分析48项研究。实验室评估,包括血球计数、化学检查和炎症标记物,发现是非特异性的,不能提高诊断准确性或告知患者护理。疑似感染灶的需氧细菌培养更有可能产生阳性结果,而血液培养通常是无菌的。研究结果表明,克林霉素不能改善SSSS的预后,支持β -内酰胺类抗生素作为首选的一线治疗。对于无法维持口服摄入的儿童,液体复苏是必要的,温和的润肤剂对皮肤护理有效。结论:研究结果支持对SSSS的检查和管理采用“少即是多”的方法,强调最少的实验室检测、靶向抗生素使用和支持性皮肤护理。未来的研究应侧重于实施这些策略和评估结果的前瞻性研究,以进一步完善护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Dermatology
Pediatric Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
269
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Pediatric Dermatology answers the need for new ideas and strategies for today''s pediatrician or dermatologist. As a teaching vehicle, the Journal is still unsurpassed and it will continue to present the latest on topics such as hemangiomas, atopic dermatitis, rare and unusual presentations of childhood diseases, neonatal medicine, and therapeutic advances. As important progress is made in any area involving infants and children, Pediatric Dermatology is there to publish the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信