Clarifications for calculating area under the curve for discounting data: A primer and technical report

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Jonathan E. Friedel, Katilyn M. Ashley Treem, Charles C. J. Frye, Shakeia K. Salem, Makenna B. Westberry-Nix, Lee Devonshire
{"title":"Clarifications for calculating area under the curve for discounting data: A primer and technical report","authors":"Jonathan E. Friedel,&nbsp;Katilyn M. Ashley Treem,&nbsp;Charles C. J. Frye,&nbsp;Shakeia K. Salem,&nbsp;Makenna B. Westberry-Nix,&nbsp;Lee Devonshire","doi":"10.1002/jeab.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Discounting is a pervasive phenomenon in human decision making and has been extensively studied across disciplines. This article focuses on area under the curve (AUC) as a popular measure of discounting. We provide a comprehensive review of AUC in relation to discounting, focusing on its atheoretical underpinnings and methods to calculate the measure. Additionally, we delve into the limitations of traditional AUC measures and limitations of more recent modifications of AUC (i.e., ordinal and logarithmic AUC). First, authors using AUC do not routinely report whether and how they impute an indifference point at the <i>y</i>-intercept, which is critically important when using the ordinal or logarithmic versions. Additionally, the ordinal version of AUC requires removing the <i>x</i>-axis information (e.g., delay, odds against, social distance, etc.) and replacing them with ordinal values. The logarithmic version of AUC often introduces nonintuitive values on the <i>x</i>-axis that lead to a high likelihood of miscalculations. We propose that authors always impute an indifference point at the <i>y</i>-intercept—when such data were not collected—and propose a novel method to shift indifference points that leads to a more intuitive logarithmic AUC calculation. An R package and Excel workbook to help calculate AUC are also provided and discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeab.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Discounting is a pervasive phenomenon in human decision making and has been extensively studied across disciplines. This article focuses on area under the curve (AUC) as a popular measure of discounting. We provide a comprehensive review of AUC in relation to discounting, focusing on its atheoretical underpinnings and methods to calculate the measure. Additionally, we delve into the limitations of traditional AUC measures and limitations of more recent modifications of AUC (i.e., ordinal and logarithmic AUC). First, authors using AUC do not routinely report whether and how they impute an indifference point at the y-intercept, which is critically important when using the ordinal or logarithmic versions. Additionally, the ordinal version of AUC requires removing the x-axis information (e.g., delay, odds against, social distance, etc.) and replacing them with ordinal values. The logarithmic version of AUC often introduces nonintuitive values on the x-axis that lead to a high likelihood of miscalculations. We propose that authors always impute an indifference point at the y-intercept—when such data were not collected—and propose a novel method to shift indifference points that leads to a more intuitive logarithmic AUC calculation. An R package and Excel workbook to help calculate AUC are also provided and discussed.

计算折现数据曲线下面积的说明:底稿和技术报告
贴现是人类决策过程中普遍存在的一种现象,已被各学科广泛研究。本文主要讨论曲线下面积(AUC)作为一种常用的折现度量。我们提供了与贴现相关的AUC的全面审查,重点是其理论基础和计算方法。此外,我们还深入研究了传统AUC度量的局限性以及最近修改的AUC(即序数和对数AUC)的局限性。首先,使用AUC的作者通常不会报告他们是否以及如何在y截距处推算无差异点,这在使用序数或对数版本时至关重要。此外,有序版本的AUC需要删除x轴信息(例如,延迟、赔率、社交距离等),并将其替换为有序值。对数版本的AUC通常会在x轴上引入非直观的值,这很可能导致错误计算。我们建议作者总是在没有收集到这样的数据时,在y轴截距处推算一个无差异点,并提出一种新的方法来转移无差异点,从而导致更直观的对数AUC计算。还提供并讨论了一个R包和Excel工作簿来帮助计算AUC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior is primarily for the original publication of experiments relevant to the behavior of individual organisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信