Narratives, emotions, and slogans: Community co-designed campaigns to recruit black blood donors from the general U.K. population.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Eamonn Ferguson, Erin Dawe-Lane, Richard Mills, Krystal Oteng-Attakora, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Angela M Wood, Barbara Masser, Abiola Okubanjo
{"title":"Narratives, emotions, and slogans: Community co-designed campaigns to recruit black blood donors from the general U.K. population.","authors":"Eamonn Ferguson, Erin Dawe-Lane, Richard Mills, Krystal Oteng-Attakora, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Angela M Wood, Barbara Masser, Abiola Okubanjo","doi":"10.1037/hea0001525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood is an essential medicine, and to deliver effective health care, blood services need to attract donors who represent the diverse demographics of health care users. At present, there is a substantial shortfall of Black donors. We report how a novel community-based co-designed arts-based approach to encourage Black donors generalizes to the wider U.K.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong></p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The co-design process involved four stages: (a) needs identification (n = 42 Black people) to identify where, when and with whom Black people discussed blood donation; (b) workshops to co-design arts-based interventions (<i>n</i> = 12: Black people-professional actors/artists and lay people); (c) test and refinement of the narratives (<i>n</i> = 1); and (d) evaluation using an online experiment to provide a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the co-designed narratives relative to a slogan-based campaign in terms of affect (mediator) and two outcomes (willingness to donate and encourage others to donate; <i>n</i> = 826: 345 Black people, 481 White people).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four script narratives were produced: (a) comedy-challenging misconceptions; (b) reciprocity-donating for mutual benefit; (c) donor-recipient-linking donors and recipients; and (d) sliding doors-reversing a timeline to provide a positive outcome. All four narratives were evaluated positively. For White people, the slogan-based campaign enhanced both outcomes via positive affect. For Black people, the donor-recipient narrative enhanced both outcomes via positive affect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All communities positively rated the co-designed arts-based approaches and showed specific benefits for encouraging Black donors. Blood services should consider using co-designed arts-based approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55066,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood is an essential medicine, and to deliver effective health care, blood services need to attract donors who represent the diverse demographics of health care users. At present, there is a substantial shortfall of Black donors. We report how a novel community-based co-designed arts-based approach to encourage Black donors generalizes to the wider U.K.

Population:

Method: The co-design process involved four stages: (a) needs identification (n = 42 Black people) to identify where, when and with whom Black people discussed blood donation; (b) workshops to co-design arts-based interventions (n = 12: Black people-professional actors/artists and lay people); (c) test and refinement of the narratives (n = 1); and (d) evaluation using an online experiment to provide a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the co-designed narratives relative to a slogan-based campaign in terms of affect (mediator) and two outcomes (willingness to donate and encourage others to donate; n = 826: 345 Black people, 481 White people).

Results: Four script narratives were produced: (a) comedy-challenging misconceptions; (b) reciprocity-donating for mutual benefit; (c) donor-recipient-linking donors and recipients; and (d) sliding doors-reversing a timeline to provide a positive outcome. All four narratives were evaluated positively. For White people, the slogan-based campaign enhanced both outcomes via positive affect. For Black people, the donor-recipient narrative enhanced both outcomes via positive affect.

Conclusion: All communities positively rated the co-designed arts-based approaches and showed specific benefits for encouraging Black donors. Blood services should consider using co-designed arts-based approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

叙述、情感和口号:社区共同设计了从英国普通人群中招募黑人献血者的活动。
背景:血液是一种基本药物,为了提供有效的卫生保健,血液服务需要吸引代表卫生保健使用者不同人口统计数据的献血者。目前,黑人捐助者严重短缺。我们报告了一种新颖的基于社区的共同设计的以艺术为基础的方法如何推广到更广泛的英国人口中,以鼓励黑人献血者:方法:共同设计过程包括四个阶段:(a)需要识别(n = 42名黑人),以确定黑人在何地、何时以及与谁讨论献血;(b)共同设计以艺术为基础的干预措施的讲习班(n = 12:黑人——专业演员/艺术家和非专业人士);(c)检验和改进叙述(n = 1);(d)使用在线实验进行评估,从影响(中介)和两个结果(捐赠意愿和鼓励他人捐赠)的角度,对基于口号的活动的共同设计叙事进行定量和定性评估;n = 826: 345名黑人,481名白人)。结果:产生了四种脚本叙事:(a)挑战喜剧的误解;(b)互惠——为互惠而捐赠;(c)将捐助国和受援国联系起来;(d)滑动门——反转时间线以提供积极的结果。所有四种叙述都得到了积极的评价。对于白人来说,以口号为基础的运动通过积极的影响增强了这两种结果。对于黑人来说,供者-受者叙事通过积极影响增强了这两种结果。结论:所有社区都积极评价共同设计的基于艺术的方法,并显示出鼓励黑人捐助者的具体好处。血液服务机构应考虑采用共同设计的基于艺术的方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology
Health Psychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Psychology publishes articles on psychological, biobehavioral, social, and environmental factors in physical health and medical illness, and other issues in health psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信