Removing Price Discounts from the Tobacco Retail Environment: Effects on College Students' Risk of Using Smokeless Tobacco, Little Cigars, and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
William G Shadel, Claude M Setodji, Steven C Martino, Michael S Dunbar, Desmond Jenson, Jody Cs Wong, Abigail Torbatian
{"title":"Removing Price Discounts from the Tobacco Retail Environment: Effects on College Students' Risk of Using Smokeless Tobacco, Little Cigars, and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices.","authors":"William G Shadel, Claude M Setodji, Steven C Martino, Michael S Dunbar, Desmond Jenson, Jody Cs Wong, Abigail Torbatian","doi":"10.15288/jsad.24-00432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The tobacco industry strives to keep product prices low through providing consumer-focused discounts (e.g., coupons) that can be applied at retail locations. Local communities have responded by prohibiting the distribution and/or redemption of coupons at retail locations, yet evidence that this policy diminishes product purchases and use intentions is lacking. The purpose of this experiment is to evaluate whether elimination of price discounts from retail locations influences use intentions for smokeless tobacco, little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs), and electronic cigarettes (ENDS) in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 298 college students recruited from the community. They participated in a simulated shopping task in the RAND StoreLab, a life-sized replica of a mid-sized convenience store. They were randomized into one of two conditions: Price discounts present (store tobacco posters displayed price discount information) or price discounts absent (no price discount information displayed on posters). The dependent measure was post-shopping intentions to use smokeless tobacco, LCCs, and ENDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to the price discounts absent condition led to a lower susceptibility of using smokeless tobacco compared to exposure to the price discounts present condition (aOR = 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23, 0.98]). Experimental condition was not related to LCC use susceptibility (aOR = 1.46 [95% CI, 0.70, 3.03]) or to ENDS use susceptibility (aOR = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.40, 1.95]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support eliminating tobacco discounts from retail locations, at least for reducing college students' desire to use some tobacco products.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The tobacco industry strives to keep product prices low through providing consumer-focused discounts (e.g., coupons) that can be applied at retail locations. Local communities have responded by prohibiting the distribution and/or redemption of coupons at retail locations, yet evidence that this policy diminishes product purchases and use intentions is lacking. The purpose of this experiment is to evaluate whether elimination of price discounts from retail locations influences use intentions for smokeless tobacco, little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs), and electronic cigarettes (ENDS) in young adults.

Methods: Participants were 298 college students recruited from the community. They participated in a simulated shopping task in the RAND StoreLab, a life-sized replica of a mid-sized convenience store. They were randomized into one of two conditions: Price discounts present (store tobacco posters displayed price discount information) or price discounts absent (no price discount information displayed on posters). The dependent measure was post-shopping intentions to use smokeless tobacco, LCCs, and ENDS.

Results: Exposure to the price discounts absent condition led to a lower susceptibility of using smokeless tobacco compared to exposure to the price discounts present condition (aOR = 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23, 0.98]). Experimental condition was not related to LCC use susceptibility (aOR = 1.46 [95% CI, 0.70, 3.03]) or to ENDS use susceptibility (aOR = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.40, 1.95]).

Conclusions: These results support eliminating tobacco discounts from retail locations, at least for reducing college students' desire to use some tobacco products.

从烟草零售环境中去除价格折扣:对大学生使用无烟烟草、小雪茄和电子尼古丁输送设备风险的影响。
目标:烟草业通过提供可在零售场所使用的以消费者为中心的折扣(如优惠券),努力保持产品价格低廉。当地社区的回应是禁止在零售场所分发和/或兑换优惠券,但缺乏证据表明这一政策减少了产品购买和使用意愿。本实验的目的是评估取消零售地点的价格折扣是否会影响年轻人对无烟烟草、小雪茄/小雪茄(lcc)和电子烟(ENDS)的使用意图。方法:从社区招募298名大学生作为研究对象。他们在兰德商店实验室(RAND StoreLab)参加了一项模拟购物任务,这是一家中型便利店的真人大小复制品。他们被随机分为两组:有价格折扣(商店烟草海报上显示价格折扣信息)或没有价格折扣(海报上没有价格折扣信息)。依赖测量是购物后使用无烟烟草的意图、低成本烟草和终端烟草。结果:暴露于没有价格折扣条件下,与暴露于价格折扣条件下相比,使用无烟烟草的易感性较低(aOR = 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23, 0.98])。实验条件与LCC使用敏感性(aOR = 1.46 [95% CI, 0.70, 3.03])和ENDS使用敏感性(aOR = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.40, 1.95])无关。结论:这些结果支持取消零售场所的烟草折扣,至少可以减少大学生使用某些烟草产品的欲望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信