Removing Price Discounts from the Tobacco Retail Environment: Effects on College Students' Risk of Using Smokeless Tobacco, Little Cigars, and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices.
William G Shadel, Claude M Setodji, Steven C Martino, Michael S Dunbar, Desmond Jenson, Jody Cs Wong, Abigail Torbatian
{"title":"Removing Price Discounts from the Tobacco Retail Environment: Effects on College Students' Risk of Using Smokeless Tobacco, Little Cigars, and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Devices.","authors":"William G Shadel, Claude M Setodji, Steven C Martino, Michael S Dunbar, Desmond Jenson, Jody Cs Wong, Abigail Torbatian","doi":"10.15288/jsad.24-00432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The tobacco industry strives to keep product prices low through providing consumer-focused discounts (e.g., coupons) that can be applied at retail locations. Local communities have responded by prohibiting the distribution and/or redemption of coupons at retail locations, yet evidence that this policy diminishes product purchases and use intentions is lacking. The purpose of this experiment is to evaluate whether elimination of price discounts from retail locations influences use intentions for smokeless tobacco, little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs), and electronic cigarettes (ENDS) in young adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 298 college students recruited from the community. They participated in a simulated shopping task in the RAND StoreLab, a life-sized replica of a mid-sized convenience store. They were randomized into one of two conditions: Price discounts present (store tobacco posters displayed price discount information) or price discounts absent (no price discount information displayed on posters). The dependent measure was post-shopping intentions to use smokeless tobacco, LCCs, and ENDS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure to the price discounts absent condition led to a lower susceptibility of using smokeless tobacco compared to exposure to the price discounts present condition (aOR = 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23, 0.98]). Experimental condition was not related to LCC use susceptibility (aOR = 1.46 [95% CI, 0.70, 3.03]) or to ENDS use susceptibility (aOR = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.40, 1.95]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support eliminating tobacco discounts from retail locations, at least for reducing college students' desire to use some tobacco products.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The tobacco industry strives to keep product prices low through providing consumer-focused discounts (e.g., coupons) that can be applied at retail locations. Local communities have responded by prohibiting the distribution and/or redemption of coupons at retail locations, yet evidence that this policy diminishes product purchases and use intentions is lacking. The purpose of this experiment is to evaluate whether elimination of price discounts from retail locations influences use intentions for smokeless tobacco, little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs), and electronic cigarettes (ENDS) in young adults.
Methods: Participants were 298 college students recruited from the community. They participated in a simulated shopping task in the RAND StoreLab, a life-sized replica of a mid-sized convenience store. They were randomized into one of two conditions: Price discounts present (store tobacco posters displayed price discount information) or price discounts absent (no price discount information displayed on posters). The dependent measure was post-shopping intentions to use smokeless tobacco, LCCs, and ENDS.
Results: Exposure to the price discounts absent condition led to a lower susceptibility of using smokeless tobacco compared to exposure to the price discounts present condition (aOR = 0.48 [95% CI, 0.23, 0.98]). Experimental condition was not related to LCC use susceptibility (aOR = 1.46 [95% CI, 0.70, 3.03]) or to ENDS use susceptibility (aOR = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.40, 1.95]).
Conclusions: These results support eliminating tobacco discounts from retail locations, at least for reducing college students' desire to use some tobacco products.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.