Attraction through similarity in autistic traits: A group communication study using social relations model and fNIRS hyperscanning.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Shuyuan Feng, Mingliang Wang, Jianing Zhang, Lin Ding, Yuqing Yuan, Peng Zhang, Xuejun Bai
{"title":"Attraction through similarity in autistic traits: A group communication study using social relations model and fNIRS hyperscanning.","authors":"Shuyuan Feng, Mingliang Wang, Jianing Zhang, Lin Ding, Yuqing Yuan, Peng Zhang, Xuejun Bai","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The double empathy problem (DEP) reconceptualizes autism's social challenges as bidirectional differences rather than unidirectional deficits. Following the DEP, the dialectical misattunement hypothesis (DMH) predicts that interaction between people with similar autistic traits will be smoother and reflected in neural synchronization. However, evidence remains inconsistent due to methodological limitations in dyadic designs and unstructured tasks, and it remains unclear whether neural mechanisms differ between passive and active social contexts across autistic trait levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the social relations model, we measured the relational attraction within four-person groups (20 female and 10 male groups), composed of two high-autistic-trait individuals and two low-autistic-trait individuals following a turn-taking discussion. Simultaneously, we recorded brain activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during both passive story listening and active turn-taking discussion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with similar autistic traits reported higher interpersonal attraction when sharing consistent opinions. Neural analyses revealed context-dependent interbrain coupling patterns: During passive story listening, low-autistic-trait dyads exhibited higher inter-subject correlation (ISC) compared to high-autistic-trait dyads. In contrast, during active communication, low-autistic-trait dyads exhibited higher interbrain synchronization (IBS) in the right temporoparietal junction, while high-autistic-trait dyads showed higher IBS in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, suggesting distinct neural mechanisms underlying social interaction across autistic trait levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the DMH and reveal that neural synchronization mechanisms vary across both autistic trait levels and social contexts. These context-dependent patterns challenge deficit-based models of autism, suggesting that high-autistic-trait individuals may employ alternative but effective neural strategies during social interaction, particularly in active communication contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8918,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2025.06.031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The double empathy problem (DEP) reconceptualizes autism's social challenges as bidirectional differences rather than unidirectional deficits. Following the DEP, the dialectical misattunement hypothesis (DMH) predicts that interaction between people with similar autistic traits will be smoother and reflected in neural synchronization. However, evidence remains inconsistent due to methodological limitations in dyadic designs and unstructured tasks, and it remains unclear whether neural mechanisms differ between passive and active social contexts across autistic trait levels.

Methods: Using the social relations model, we measured the relational attraction within four-person groups (20 female and 10 male groups), composed of two high-autistic-trait individuals and two low-autistic-trait individuals following a turn-taking discussion. Simultaneously, we recorded brain activity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) during both passive story listening and active turn-taking discussion.

Results: Individuals with similar autistic traits reported higher interpersonal attraction when sharing consistent opinions. Neural analyses revealed context-dependent interbrain coupling patterns: During passive story listening, low-autistic-trait dyads exhibited higher inter-subject correlation (ISC) compared to high-autistic-trait dyads. In contrast, during active communication, low-autistic-trait dyads exhibited higher interbrain synchronization (IBS) in the right temporoparietal junction, while high-autistic-trait dyads showed higher IBS in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, suggesting distinct neural mechanisms underlying social interaction across autistic trait levels.

Conclusions: Our findings support the DMH and reveal that neural synchronization mechanisms vary across both autistic trait levels and social contexts. These context-dependent patterns challenge deficit-based models of autism, suggesting that high-autistic-trait individuals may employ alternative but effective neural strategies during social interaction, particularly in active communication contexts.

孤独症特征的相似性吸引:基于社会关系模型和近红外超扫描的群体交流研究。
背景:双重共情问题(DEP)将自闭症的社会挑战重新定义为双向差异而不是单向缺陷。在DEP之后,辩证失调假说(DMH)预测具有相似自闭症特征的人之间的互动会更顺畅,并反映在神经同步上。然而,由于二元设计和非结构化任务的方法限制,证据仍然不一致,并且仍然不清楚在自闭症特征水平上,被动和主动社会环境之间的神经机制是否存在差异。方法:采用社会关系模型,对由2名高自闭特质个体和2名低自闭特质个体组成的4人小组(20名女性和10名男性)的关系吸引力进行了测量。同时,我们使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)记录了被动听故事和主动轮流讨论时的大脑活动。结果:具有相似自闭症特征的个体在分享一致的观点时表现出更高的人际吸引力。神经分析揭示了情境依赖的脑间耦合模式:在被动故事聆听过程中,低自闭症特质双组比高自闭症特质双组表现出更高的主体间相关性(ISC)。相比之下,在主动交流中,低自闭症特质双组在右侧颞顶交界处表现出更高的脑间同步(IBS),而高自闭症特质双组在右侧背外侧前额叶皮层表现出更高的脑间同步(IBS),这表明不同自闭症特质水平的社会互动背后有不同的神经机制。结论:我们的研究结果支持了DMH,并揭示了神经同步机制在自闭症特征水平和社会背景下的差异。这些情境依赖模式挑战了基于自闭症缺陷的模型,表明高自闭症特征的个体在社交互动中,特别是在积极的交流环境中,可能会采用替代的但有效的神经策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Psychiatry
Biological Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
18.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
1398
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Biological Psychiatry is an official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry and was established in 1969. It is the first journal in the Biological Psychiatry family, which also includes Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging and Biological Psychiatry: Global Open Science. The Society's main goal is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in the fields related to the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders pertaining to thought, emotion, and behavior. To fulfill this mission, Biological Psychiatry publishes peer-reviewed, rapid-publication articles that present new findings from original basic, translational, and clinical mechanistic research, ultimately advancing our understanding of psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal also encourages the submission of reviews and commentaries on current research and topics of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信