{"title":"Scaffolding of learning activities: Aptitude-treatment-interaction effects in math?","authors":"Sarah I. Hofer , Frank Reinhold","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Due to differences in learners' resources in specific learning situations, they may not profit equally from learning activities such as task practice or learning with analogies. Scaffolds can help to adapt learning activities to learners' needs.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We want to answer the question who benefits from what scaffold when learning about fractions on the number line in digitally-enriched mathematics instruction in the classroom.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Participants were 332 6th-Graders.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dynamic visualizations were used as <em>information-processing scaffold</em> when learning with analogies. During repeated practice, adaptive task difficulty was implemented as <em>motivational scaffold</em> and individualized explanations based on typical mistakes were offered as <em>information scaffold</em>. Students were randomly assigned to one of the scaffold conditions or a control group without scaffolds. As characteristics potentially affecting learning processes during learning activities, we assessed prior knowledge, sustained attention, general reasoning, visual-spatial abilities as well as interest and self-concept in mathematics. These learner characteristics were included as predictors in Generalized Linear Mixed Models, together with the experimental conditions. Due to the nature of the multi-track school system in Germany, advanced placement school (APS; <em>Gymnasium</em>) students and vocational school (VS; <em>Mittelschule</em>) students were considered separately.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><div>For APS students, the different scaffolds yielded minimal effects. For VS students, dynamic visualizations could compensate for lower general reasoning and visual-spatial ability when learning with analogies and adaptive task difficulty seemed to successfully counteract lower interest during practice. Instruction can be individualized based on the conditioning of scaffolds on the specific mechanisms underlying different learning activities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102177"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095947522500101X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Due to differences in learners' resources in specific learning situations, they may not profit equally from learning activities such as task practice or learning with analogies. Scaffolds can help to adapt learning activities to learners' needs.
Aims
We want to answer the question who benefits from what scaffold when learning about fractions on the number line in digitally-enriched mathematics instruction in the classroom.
Sample
Participants were 332 6th-Graders.
Methods
Dynamic visualizations were used as information-processing scaffold when learning with analogies. During repeated practice, adaptive task difficulty was implemented as motivational scaffold and individualized explanations based on typical mistakes were offered as information scaffold. Students were randomly assigned to one of the scaffold conditions or a control group without scaffolds. As characteristics potentially affecting learning processes during learning activities, we assessed prior knowledge, sustained attention, general reasoning, visual-spatial abilities as well as interest and self-concept in mathematics. These learner characteristics were included as predictors in Generalized Linear Mixed Models, together with the experimental conditions. Due to the nature of the multi-track school system in Germany, advanced placement school (APS; Gymnasium) students and vocational school (VS; Mittelschule) students were considered separately.
Results and conclusion
For APS students, the different scaffolds yielded minimal effects. For VS students, dynamic visualizations could compensate for lower general reasoning and visual-spatial ability when learning with analogies and adaptive task difficulty seemed to successfully counteract lower interest during practice. Instruction can be individualized based on the conditioning of scaffolds on the specific mechanisms underlying different learning activities.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.