Spontaneous Strategies Used During Novel Word Learning

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Matti Laine, Claudia Peñaloza, Tilda Eräste, Anton Kunnari, Antoni Rodríguez‐Fornells
{"title":"Spontaneous Strategies Used During Novel Word Learning","authors":"Matti Laine, Claudia Peñaloza, Tilda Eräste, Anton Kunnari, Antoni Rodríguez‐Fornells","doi":"10.1111/lang.12725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This online study examined spontaneous strategies of English‐speaking adults during associative word learning, the relationship of these strategies with learning outcomes and within‐task evolution of strategy use. Participants were to learn to name 14 object–pseudoword pairs across five successive encoding/recall blocks, followed by delayed recall 2 days later. Participants (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 210) were randomized to learn novel object–pseudoword associations (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 93) or familiar object–pseudoword associations (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 117). Open‐ended strategy reports followed each block. The participants’ learning curves were similar in both conditions. Most participants in both groups (60–70%) reported strategy use, with some qualitative group differences in preferred strategy types. Manipulation strategies like creating associations were related to superior performance in the first learning blocks but did not predict better delayed recall. Strategic choices gradually stabilized during learning. Our results show the prevalence of associative strategies when adults learn new word–referent mappings and highlight the importance of strategy use in individual differences in the progress of learning.","PeriodicalId":51371,"journal":{"name":"Language Learning","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Learning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12725","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This online study examined spontaneous strategies of English‐speaking adults during associative word learning, the relationship of these strategies with learning outcomes and within‐task evolution of strategy use. Participants were to learn to name 14 object–pseudoword pairs across five successive encoding/recall blocks, followed by delayed recall 2 days later. Participants (n = 210) were randomized to learn novel object–pseudoword associations (n = 93) or familiar object–pseudoword associations (n = 117). Open‐ended strategy reports followed each block. The participants’ learning curves were similar in both conditions. Most participants in both groups (60–70%) reported strategy use, with some qualitative group differences in preferred strategy types. Manipulation strategies like creating associations were related to superior performance in the first learning blocks but did not predict better delayed recall. Strategic choices gradually stabilized during learning. Our results show the prevalence of associative strategies when adults learn new word–referent mappings and highlight the importance of strategy use in individual differences in the progress of learning.
新单词学习中的自发策略
这项在线研究考察了英语成年人在联想词学习过程中的自发策略,这些策略与学习结果的关系以及策略使用在任务内的演变。参与者在5个连续的编码/回忆块中学习命名14个对象-伪词对,然后在2天后进行延迟回忆。参与者(n = 210)被随机分配学习新的物体-假词联想(n = 93)或熟悉的物体-假词联想(n = 117)。每个区块之后都有开放式战略报告。在两种情况下,参与者的学习曲线是相似的。两组的大多数参与者(60-70%)报告了策略的使用,在偏好的策略类型上有一些定性的组差异。像创建联想这样的操作策略与第一个学习模块的优异表现有关,但并不能预测更好的延迟回忆。在学习过程中,策略选择逐渐稳定下来。我们的研究结果显示了联想策略在成人学习新的词指映射时的普遍性,并强调了策略使用在学习进展中的个体差异的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Learning
Language Learning Multiple-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Language Learning is a scientific journal dedicated to the understanding of language learning broadly defined. It publishes research articles that systematically apply methods of inquiry from disciplines including psychology, linguistics, cognitive science, educational inquiry, neuroscience, ethnography, sociolinguistics, sociology, and anthropology. It is concerned with fundamental theoretical issues in language learning such as child, second, and foreign language acquisition, language education, bilingualism, literacy, language representation in mind and brain, culture, cognition, pragmatics, and intergroup relations. A subscription includes one or two annual supplements, alternating among a volume from the Language Learning Cognitive Neuroscience Series, the Currents in Language Learning Series or the Language Learning Special Issue Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信