Novel Clinical Assessment of Visual, Vestibular, Somatosensory, and Autonomic Function: Establishing Test Re-Test Reliability in a Healthy Population.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Michaela McGrath, Gordon Waddington, Bernie Bissett, Angie Fearon, Jeremy Witchalls
{"title":"Novel Clinical Assessment of Visual, Vestibular, Somatosensory, and Autonomic Function: Establishing Test Re-Test Reliability in a Healthy Population.","authors":"Michaela McGrath, Gordon Waddington, Bernie Bissett, Angie Fearon, Jeremy Witchalls","doi":"10.1177/00315125251358318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionMaintaining balance is a complex process involving the integration of information from the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory (VVS) systems, along with autonomic nervous system (ANS) function. Traditional assessments of these systems are often expensive, limited to specialised settings or focus on overall balance outcomes, potentially overlooking deficits in the individual systems. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a novel, fully portable clinical assessment tool designed to provide objective measures for individual components of the VVS system and ANS function.MethodsTwenty-eight participants (aged 20-88 years), with no comorbidities and meeting Australian physical activity guidelines, completed the protocol twice. The novel clinical assessment tool comprised of two systems: (1) a virtual reality-type headset incorporating eye-tracking to evaluate visual-vestibular function (smooth pursuit and voluntary saccades), and autonomic function (pupil light reflex); and (2) the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA) for somatosensory function. Reliability was assessed using two-way mixed-effects model (consistency type, single rater) Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC 3,1) calculated in R-studio. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) was also calculated. Bland-Altman plots were utilised to visualise the agreement between two test repeats.ResultsEach metric demonstrated at least moderate to good test re-test reliability: left and right AMEDA (ICC = 0.69 and 0.75), smooth pursuit (ICC = 0.67), voluntary saccades (ICC = 0.53), autonomic response delay (ICC = 0.80), parasympathetic function (ICC = 0.86), and sympathetic function (ICC = 0.89).DiscussionThis study supports the reliability of a new, fully portable clinical assessment tool to assess VVS and ANS function. By demonstrating the reliability of this new streamlined tool for evaluating the VVS and ANS systems, the findings of this study has the potential to enhance clinical practice and research in falls prevention and balance rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251358318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251358318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionMaintaining balance is a complex process involving the integration of information from the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory (VVS) systems, along with autonomic nervous system (ANS) function. Traditional assessments of these systems are often expensive, limited to specialised settings or focus on overall balance outcomes, potentially overlooking deficits in the individual systems. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of a novel, fully portable clinical assessment tool designed to provide objective measures for individual components of the VVS system and ANS function.MethodsTwenty-eight participants (aged 20-88 years), with no comorbidities and meeting Australian physical activity guidelines, completed the protocol twice. The novel clinical assessment tool comprised of two systems: (1) a virtual reality-type headset incorporating eye-tracking to evaluate visual-vestibular function (smooth pursuit and voluntary saccades), and autonomic function (pupil light reflex); and (2) the Active Movement Extent Discrimination Apparatus (AMEDA) for somatosensory function. Reliability was assessed using two-way mixed-effects model (consistency type, single rater) Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC 3,1) calculated in R-studio. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC) was also calculated. Bland-Altman plots were utilised to visualise the agreement between two test repeats.ResultsEach metric demonstrated at least moderate to good test re-test reliability: left and right AMEDA (ICC = 0.69 and 0.75), smooth pursuit (ICC = 0.67), voluntary saccades (ICC = 0.53), autonomic response delay (ICC = 0.80), parasympathetic function (ICC = 0.86), and sympathetic function (ICC = 0.89).DiscussionThis study supports the reliability of a new, fully portable clinical assessment tool to assess VVS and ANS function. By demonstrating the reliability of this new streamlined tool for evaluating the VVS and ANS systems, the findings of this study has the potential to enhance clinical practice and research in falls prevention and balance rehabilitation.

视觉、前庭、体感和自主神经功能的新临床评估:在健康人群中建立测试再测试信度。
维持平衡是一个复杂的过程,涉及视觉、前庭和体感(VVS)系统以及自主神经系统(ANS)功能的信息整合。对这些系统的传统评估往往是昂贵的,局限于专门的设置或侧重于总体平衡结果,可能忽视个别系统的缺陷。本研究旨在评估一种新型的、完全便携式的临床评估工具的重测可靠性,该工具旨在为VVS系统的各个组成部分和ANS功能提供客观的测量。方法28名参与者(年龄20-88岁),无合并症,符合澳大利亚身体活动指南,完成两次方案。该新型临床评估工具由两个系统组成:(1)虚拟现实型头戴式眼动追踪系统,用于评估视觉前庭功能(平滑追踪和自发性跳眼)和自主神经功能(瞳孔光反射);(2)体感觉功能的主动运动程度判别仪(AMEDA)。可靠性评估采用双向混合效应模型(一致性型,单一评分者)在R-studio中计算的类内相关系数(ICC 3,1)。还计算了测量的标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC)。Bland-Altman图用于可视化两个测试重复之间的一致性。结果左、右AMEDA (ICC = 0.69和0.75)、顺滑追踪(ICC = 0.67)、自发性跳眼(ICC = 0.53)、自主反应延迟(ICC = 0.80)、副交感神经功能(ICC = 0.86)和交感神经功能(ICC = 0.89)等指标均表现出中等至良好的重测信度。本研究支持了一种新的、完全便携式的临床评估工具来评估VVS和ANS功能的可靠性。通过证明这种新的流线型工具用于评估VVS和ANS系统的可靠性,本研究的发现有可能加强跌倒预防和平衡康复的临床实践和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信