Total neoadjuvant treatment with short-course radiotherapy followed by sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin versus short-course radiotherapy followed by capecitabine–oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (SPRING-01): a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, randomised controlled trial

Feng Tian, Honghai Dai, Dan Sha, Yuanzi Yu, Haiyan Jing, Cong Sun, Liang Shang, Yubo Liu, Renxiang Feng, Jun Li, Hongjun Liu, Yuezhi Chen, Yulong Shi, Jinshen Wang, Hongqing Zhuo, Xiaoqiao Zhang, Guodong Lian, Wei Chong, Hao Chen, Zhe Yang, Changqing Jing
{"title":"Total neoadjuvant treatment with short-course radiotherapy followed by sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin versus short-course radiotherapy followed by capecitabine–oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (SPRING-01): a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, randomised controlled trial","authors":"Feng Tian, Honghai Dai, Dan Sha, Yuanzi Yu, Haiyan Jing, Cong Sun, Liang Shang, Yubo Liu, Renxiang Feng, Jun Li, Hongjun Liu, Yuezhi Chen, Yulong Shi, Jinshen Wang, Hongqing Zhuo, Xiaoqiao Zhang, Guodong Lian, Wei Chong, Hao Chen, Zhe Yang, Changqing Jing","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00286-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy increases the pathological complete response rate for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The potential synergistic effects of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy might benefit patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of short-course radiotherapy followed by capecitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.<h3>Methods</h3>SPRING-01 was a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, randomised controlled trial done at the Shandong Provincial Hospital, China. Patients were aged 18–85 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and had biopsy-confirmed, newly diagnosed, treatment-naive, primary, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma with at least one of the following features: clinical tumour stage T3–4 or greater, clinical nodal stage N1 or higher, extramural vascular invasion, mesorectal fascia involvement, or lateral lymph node metastasis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin or capecitabine–oxaliplatin alone. The randomisation sequence was generated using computer-generated random numbers with SAS software version 9.4, using a simple randomisation method without stratification or blocking, and allocation was concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. Neither patients nor clinical staff were masked to treatment allocation; however, pathological assessments and data analyses were conducted in a blinded manner. Patients received short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy over 5 days) followed by six cycles of intravenous capecitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m<sup>2</sup> over 2 h on day 1, and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> twice daily on days 1–14 of each 3-week cycle) with or without intravenous sintilimab (200 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1 of each 3-week cycle), starting 1 week after completion of radiotherapy. Total mesorectal excision surgery, was done 2–3 weeks after the completion of total neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052288).<h3>Findings</h3>Between Oct 8, 2021, and Sept 26, 2023, 116 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were screened, of whom 98 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group (n=49) or the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group (n=49). 68 (69%) of 98 patients were male and 30 (31%) were female; all patients were Asian. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 20–32). The pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group than in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group (29 [59·2%, 95% CI 45·4–72·9] <em>vs</em> 16 [32·7%, 19·5–45·8]; p=0·015). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 (24% [95% CI 12–37]) of 45 patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in five (11% [2–21]) of 44 in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. Treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant therapy occurred in 45 (92%) of 49 patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in 44 (90%) of 49 patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group were thrombocytopenia (18 [37%] <em>vs</em> 26 [53%]), leukopenia (19 [39%] <em>vs</em> 26 [53%]), anaemia (27 [55%] <em>vs</em> 33 [67%]), nausea or vomiting (25 [51%] <em>vs</em> 27 [55%]), and diarrhoea (21 [43%] <em>vs</em> 24 [49%]). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 16 (33%) patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and 17 (35%) patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. The most common grade 3–4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia, reported in six (12%) patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in 11 (22%) patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. Serious adverse events occurred in 15 (31%) of 49 patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in nine (18%) of 49 patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. The most common serious adverse event in both treatment groups was thrombocytopenia. One (2%) patient in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group died from septic shock due to acute ileus. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, short-course radiotherapy combined with sintilimab and capecitabine–oxaliplatin as a total neoadjuvant treatment significantly increased the pathological complete response rate while maintaining manageable safety profile. These findings suggest that this regimen might be a promising neoadjuvant treatment approach for locally advanced rectal cancer.<h3>Funding</h3>The National Natural Science Foundation of China; The Special Foundation for Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province; The Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province; The Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; The China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; and Innovent Biologics.<h3>Translation</h3>For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00286-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy increases the pathological complete response rate for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The potential synergistic effects of combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy might benefit patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of short-course radiotherapy followed by capecitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy as total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

SPRING-01 was a single-centre, open-label, phase 2, randomised controlled trial done at the Shandong Provincial Hospital, China. Patients were aged 18–85 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 and had biopsy-confirmed, newly diagnosed, treatment-naive, primary, locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma with at least one of the following features: clinical tumour stage T3–4 or greater, clinical nodal stage N1 or higher, extramural vascular invasion, mesorectal fascia involvement, or lateral lymph node metastasis. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin or capecitabine–oxaliplatin alone. The randomisation sequence was generated using computer-generated random numbers with SAS software version 9.4, using a simple randomisation method without stratification or blocking, and allocation was concealed using opaque, sealed envelopes. Neither patients nor clinical staff were masked to treatment allocation; however, pathological assessments and data analyses were conducted in a blinded manner. Patients received short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy over 5 days) followed by six cycles of intravenous capecitabine–oxaliplatin chemotherapy (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2 h on day 1, and oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 of each 3-week cycle) with or without intravenous sintilimab (200 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 3-week cycle), starting 1 week after completion of radiotherapy. Total mesorectal excision surgery, was done 2–3 weeks after the completion of total neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response rate in the intention-to-treat population. The trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100052288).

Findings

Between Oct 8, 2021, and Sept 26, 2023, 116 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were screened, of whom 98 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group (n=49) or the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group (n=49). 68 (69%) of 98 patients were male and 30 (31%) were female; all patients were Asian. Median follow-up was 25 months (IQR 20–32). The pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group than in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group (29 [59·2%, 95% CI 45·4–72·9] vs 16 [32·7%, 19·5–45·8]; p=0·015). Postoperative complications occurred in 11 (24% [95% CI 12–37]) of 45 patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in five (11% [2–21]) of 44 in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. Treatment-related adverse events during neoadjuvant therapy occurred in 45 (92%) of 49 patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in 44 (90%) of 49 patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. The most common treatment-related adverse events in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group were thrombocytopenia (18 [37%] vs 26 [53%]), leukopenia (19 [39%] vs 26 [53%]), anaemia (27 [55%] vs 33 [67%]), nausea or vomiting (25 [51%] vs 27 [55%]), and diarrhoea (21 [43%] vs 24 [49%]). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 16 (33%) patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and 17 (35%) patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. The most common grade 3–4 adverse event was thrombocytopenia, reported in six (12%) patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in 11 (22%) patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. Serious adverse events occurred in 15 (31%) of 49 patients in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group and in nine (18%) of 49 patients in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group. The most common serious adverse event in both treatment groups was thrombocytopenia. One (2%) patient in the capecitabine–oxaliplatin group died from septic shock due to acute ileus. No treatment-related deaths occurred in the sintilimab plus capecitabine–oxaliplatin group.

Interpretation

In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, short-course radiotherapy combined with sintilimab and capecitabine–oxaliplatin as a total neoadjuvant treatment significantly increased the pathological complete response rate while maintaining manageable safety profile. These findings suggest that this regimen might be a promising neoadjuvant treatment approach for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China; The Special Foundation for Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province; The Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province; The Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province; The China Postdoctoral Science Foundation; and Innovent Biologics.

Translation

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
局部晚期直肠癌患者全新辅助治疗短期放疗加辛替单加卡培他滨-奥沙利铂vs短期放疗加卡培他滨-奥沙利铂(spring01):一项单中心、开放标签、2期随机对照试验
背景:新辅助短程放疗联合化疗作为总新辅助治疗可提高局部晚期直肠癌患者的病理完全缓解率。放射治疗与免疫治疗相结合的潜在协同效应可能使局部晚期直肠癌患者受益。我们的目的是比较短期放疗后卡培他滨-奥沙利铂化疗加免疫治疗或不加免疫治疗作为局部晚期直肠癌患者总新辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。方法sprspring -01是一项在中国山东省医院进行的单中心、开放标签、2期随机对照试验。患者年龄18-85岁,东部肿瘤合作组评分0-1分,活检证实,新诊断,未治疗,原发性,局部晚期直肠腺癌,至少有以下特征之一:临床肿瘤分期T3-4或更高,临床淋巴结分期N1或更高,外血管侵犯,直肠系膜筋膜受损伤,或外侧淋巴结转移。参与者被随机分配(1:1)接受欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂或单独卡培他滨-奥沙利铂。随机化序列采用SAS软件9.4版计算机生成的随机数生成,采用简单的随机化方法,无分层或阻塞,分配使用不透明的密封信封进行隐藏。患者和临床工作人员都不知道治疗分配;然而,病理评估和数据分析采用盲法进行。患者接受短期放疗(5 × 5 Gy / 5天),随后进行6个周期的静脉卡培他滨-奥沙利铂化疗(第1天静脉奥沙利铂130 mg/m2 2 h,每3周周期第1 - 14天口服卡培他滨1000 mg/m2 2次,每天2次),伴或不伴辛替单抗静脉注射(每3周周期第1天200 mg/m2),放疗结束后1周开始。全肠系膜切除手术,在新辅助治疗完成2-3周后进行。主要终点是意向治疗人群的病理完全缓解率。该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2100052288)。在2021年10月8日至2023年9月26日期间,对116例局部晚期直肠癌患者进行了筛查,其中98例符合条件的患者被随机分配到欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组(n=49)或卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组(n=49)。98例患者中男性68例(69%),女性30例(31%);所有患者均为亚洲人。中位随访25个月(IQR 20-32)。辛替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组病理完全缓解率显著高于卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组(29 [59.2%,95% CI 45.4 - 72.9] vs 16 [32.7%, 19.5 - 45.8];p = 0·015)。欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组45例患者中有11例(24% [95% CI 12-37])出现术后并发症,卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组44例患者中有5例(11%[2-21])出现术后并发症。新辅助治疗期间,欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组49例患者中有45例(92%)出现治疗相关不良事件,卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组49例患者中有44例(90%)出现不良事件。欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组和卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组最常见的治疗相关不良事件是血小板减少(18例[37%]vs 26例[53%])、白细胞减少(19例[39%]vs 26例[53%])、贫血(27例[55%]vs 33例[67%])、恶心或呕吐(25例[51%]vs 27例[55%])和腹泻(21例[43%]vs 24例[49%])。欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组有16例(33%)患者出现3-4级治疗相关不良事件,卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组有17例(35%)患者出现3-4级治疗相关不良事件。最常见的3-4级不良事件是血小板减少,辛替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组中有6例(12%)患者报告了血小板减少,卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组中有11例(22%)患者报告了血小板减少。欣替单抗联合卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组49例患者中有15例(31%)发生严重不良事件,卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组49例患者中有9例(18%)发生严重不良事件。两个治疗组中最常见的严重不良事件是血小板减少症。卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组1例(2%)患者死于急性肠梗阻引起的感染性休克。辛替单抗加卡培他滨-奥沙利铂组无治疗相关死亡发生。在局部晚期直肠癌患者中,短期放疗联合辛替单抗和卡培他滨-奥沙利铂作为总新辅助治疗可显著提高病理完全缓解率,同时保持可控的安全性。 这些发现表明,该方案可能是一种有希望的局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗方法。国家自然科学基金;山东省泰山学者奖励计划专项基金;山东省重点研发计划;山东省自然科学基金;中国博士后科学基金;和创新生物。摘要的中文译文见补充资料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信